Our server costs $25 per month to run. Please consider donating to help keep the site running.
Current time: 21st April 2015, 06:44

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
#1
Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

I’m not sure how to answer this because I haven’t yet explored it properly. I’m not entirely sure if there really does have to be a scientific reason... I mean... I guess so. But how would I go about answering this?
On spot, I said my scientific reason is because it works... and it’s been proven. Because helping others works for the benefit of my own race and has proved equally beneficial for myself.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid...
I would like to be able to build a better argument...
Perspective goes a long way to finding some acceptance.

When I say I don't need salvation, I'm saying I don't need a sky daddy to forgive me for being born.

"We need not a God; just another human being to give life a meaning. For people are truly all people have" author unknown

Reply
#2
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Quote:He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy.

No, you don't.

Your friend is an ignoramus,I really wouldn't bother Be.like trying to communicate with an Orangutang. However,if you must:

Refer him to the notion of ETHICS, aka moral philosophy,based on reason,not science..,


Quote:Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a branch of philosophy that addresses questions about morality — that is, concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, justice, virtue, etc.
Major branches of ethics include:
Meta-ethics, about the theoretical meaning and reference of moral propositions and how their truth-values (if any) may be determined;
Normative ethics, about the practical means of determining a moral course of action;
Applied ethics, about how moral outcomes can be achieved in specific situations;
Moral psychology, about how moral capacity or moral agency develops and what its nature is; and
Descriptive ethics, about what moral values people actually abide by.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_philosophy

Man is not so much a rational animal as a rationalising one.
Reply
#3
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Scientific answer.


Quote:Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. Even the very wise cannot see all ends.

Gandalf The Gray.
Reply
#4
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
@Padriac- So reason alone is indicative without scientifc evidence? I think the point was to defend his lack of scientific evidence of the existance of God.

In the video it says... "Where ever else it comes from it's not from scripture" when if some use scripture to better their own personal morality. Those individuals are then part of society which shapes societal morality. Societal Morality is at least partially based on the Bible (or at the very least people who use the Bible). His contention is that any influence from the Bible would be counter productive to furthering altruis, but one of the key proponents of Biblical teachings are to love thy neighbor as you would want to be loved. Seems to be an inaccurate and unfounded statement.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

"A lot of people are unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts their worldview. So telling them that it's false doesn't necessarily slow them down. That's how urban legends get started for the most case. Like the woman who supposedly put her poodle in the microwave to dry it off. And it exploded." David Mikkelson (snopes)
Reply
#5
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 01:08)Scott Richens Wrote: A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

I’m not sure how to answer this because I haven’t yet explored it properly. I’m not entirely sure if there really does have to be a scientific reason... I mean... I guess so. But how would I go about answering this?
On spot, I said my scientific reason is because it works... and it’s been proven. Because helping others works for the benefit of my own race and has proved equally beneficial for myself.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid... I think the problem is mainly him... he doesn’t want to hear it and just blocks it out. He wants to have me stumped. I would like to be able to build a better argument...

Scientific answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_evolution
And the prize for hide and seek champion goes to ......god.

Reply
#6
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 13:37)tackattack Wrote: @Padriac- So reason alone is indicative without scientifc evidence? I think the point was to defend his lack of scientific evidence of the existance of God.

In the video it says... "Where ever else it comes from it's not from scripture" when if some use scripture to better their own personal morality. Those individuals are then part of society which shapes societal morality. Societal Morality is at least partially based on the Bible (or at the very least people who use the Bible). His contention is that any influence from the Bible would be counter productive to furthering altruis, but one of the key proponents of Biblical teachings are to love thy neighbor as you would want to be loved. Seems to be an inaccurate and unfounded statement.

The moss copied 7 commandments from the Egyptian book of the dead
Reply
#7
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 01:08)Scott Richens Wrote: A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid... I think the problem is mainly him... he doesn’t want to hear it and just blocks it out. He wants to have me stumped. I would like to be able to build a better argument...

It's pretty simple how to answer this- firstly your friend (although why you want to be friends with a person like that is beyond me) needs to be reminded that you don't have to explain or justify your position. Your views are based on logic and common sense, and common sense has been around far longer than the idea of gods, christianity or supposed morality. A neanderthal understood that if he stuck a spear in his friend, his friend would die, therefore he wouldn't do it. That is common sense.

Christians love to claim a monopoly on morality, but they have no basis for this whatsoever.

Furthermore, after many attempts myself, I would no longer bother trying to deconvert a christian. Because frankly this planet was ours long before it was taken over by the sheep and their god of delusions; it's christianity that is the new kid on the block, not atheists, and the way it swaggers about proclaiming hither and dither is well deserving of an ass kicking.

Devil
[Image: cassandrasaid.jpg]
Reply
#8
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Who needs a scientific answer when you have George Carlin?





“Society is not a disease, it is a disaster. What a stupid miracle that one can live in it.” ~ E.M. Cioran
Reply
#9
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Ashendant.. back up your claim with specifics.. I count maybe 3 at a stretch.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

"A lot of people are unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts their worldview. So telling them that it's false doesn't necessarily slow them down. That's how urban legends get started for the most case. Like the woman who supposedly put her poodle in the microwave to dry it off. And it exploded." David Mikkelson (snopes)
Reply
#10
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 16:34)tackattack Wrote: Ashendant.. back up your claim with specifics.. I count maybe 3 at a stretch.

He's right, I already brought this up recently ..

http://atheistforums.org/thread-4684.html
[Image: cassandrasaid.jpg]
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The human male, Reason for all evil? fattychan 7 245 13th April 2015, 00:48
Last Post: SteelCurtain
  Moral Compass Lakul 40 926 6th April 2015, 09:28
Last Post: Spooky
Brick Atheist moral code Void 45 1313 24th March 2015, 21:14
Last Post: I Am Not A Human Being
  Psychosis - another reason to be anti-theist watchamadoodle 31 1052 13th March 2015, 21:37
Last Post: psychoslice
  Do we expect too much from human reason? whateverist 132 2656 6th March 2015, 10:48
Last Post: comet
  Atheists only vote please: Do absolute MORAL truths exist? Is Rape ALWAYS "wrong"? Tsun Tsu 326 7174 25th February 2015, 16:41
Last Post: robvalue
  Help: jumped on for seeking scientific proof of spiritual healing emilynghiem 55 1652 21st February 2015, 03:54
Last Post: JesusHChrist
  UK says atheists more moral than theists robvalue 21 673 20th January 2015, 11:38
Last Post: robvalue
  Best Reason to be an Atheist: Spooky 32 1067 19th January 2015, 18:53
Last Post: dyresand
  Atheism, Scientific Atheism and Antitheism tantric 33 1112 18th January 2015, 14:05
Last Post: helyott



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)