Ann Coulter Reminds the WLB That His Racist Fans Don't Care About Tax Cuts

[Brian37]

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/08/fck-them...-the-rich/

‘F*ck them’: Ann Coulter attacks Trump and questions the GOP gospel of tax cuts for the rich

“Bush cut taxes!” she exclaimed. “Did it create millions of jobs? Nope. The rich pocketed their tax cut & sent jobs abroad, hired guest workers. F– them.”

Can't argue with her there.  Hell, the WLB was one of them!

“It’s like Night of the Living Dead watching our beloved @realDonaldTrump go to DC & start babbling the same old GOP nonsense on tax cuts,” she tweeted. “Want to get the crowd hollering, @realDonaldTrump? Talk about THE WALL!”

“Tax cuts are a 2d term issue,” Coulter argued. “1st term: BUILD THE WALL, End DACA, Deport Illegals, No Refugees, No Muslims, Immigrn Moratorium. SAVE USA!”

This is what his neo-nazi, KKK, fan base wants to see!

Keep reminding him, Ann.

(And us, too.)

Ann, "DAMN IT GOP, sell the bigotry then you can fuck over your gullible voters."

[Kosh]

We had a prickola on radio this morning from the Chartered Accountants (Ireland) and he was essentially sayin that it was about time that US corp taxes were reduced. Needless to say I turned on Lyric fairly quickly.

I agree that the US tax code could use some simplification, but it's utter bullshit that American companies are overtaxed. 

https://americansfortaxfairness.org/tax-...tax-rates/

The top statutory tax rate of 35% in the U.S. is somewhat higher than that of 30 other OECD countries, but the average effective tax rate — the actual rate paid after deductions and credits — is slightly lower than our competitors, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS).
Several studies have found that U.S. corporations pay a similar or a lower effective tax rate — the rate actually paid — than corporations in other countries. For example:

• Our average effective tax rate is 27.1% compared with 27.7% for the other 30 OECD countries, according to CRS.
  
• Profitable corporations paid U.S. income taxes amounting to just 12.6% of worldwide income in 2010, according to the Government Accountability Office.
  
• Citizens for Tax Justice’s survey of 288 corporations, which included most of the Fortune 500 corporations that were profitable each year from 2008 through 2012, found that they paid an average effective federal tax rate of just 19.4% over that period.
  
• Of 125 corporations in that study that had significant foreign profits, 82 (two-thirds) paid a higher effective rate to foreign governments than they paid to the U.S.
  

Some corporations pay nothing in taxes

• General Electric, Boeing, Priceline.com, Verizon and 22 other profitable Fortune 500 firms paid no federal income taxes from 2008 through 2012, according to Citizens for Tax Justice.
  
• 111 profitable Fortune 500 firms paid zero federal taxes in at least one of those five years.
  
• General Electric, one of the most notorious corporate tax dodgers, got $3.1 billion in refunds on $27.5 billion in profits from 2008 to 2012. The company paid less in federal income taxes in five years than a single American family pays in one year.
  

 
The pubes bitch about poor people on welfare, but couldn't give two shits about billionaire CEOs and their companies dodging tens of billions in taxes through creative money laundering.  The idiocracy of the American public is truly breathtaking.
I also love this tidbit of information.  I'm guessing that reversing this trend isn't what Trump has in mind for making murrica great again. 

Corporate share of federal tax revenue has dropped by two-thirds in 60 years — from 32% in 1952 to 10% in 2013.

[Minimalist]

I was with the IRS in 1986 when St. Reagan the Fucktard last "simplified" the tax code.  They added 800 pages.  I was still a fairly new union official at that time and I recall one older revenue agent walking in to the union office with two books:  The old Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the new revised Code of 1986.  The "simplified" one was a good 3/4 of an inch thicker and he laughed and said "I'm too old to learn this much more bullshit.  Where do I get the papers to retire?"

[Edwardo Piet]

Can't stand Ann Coulter. I wouldn't fuck her with a stolen dick.

[Crossless2.0]

Can't stand Ann Coulter. I wouldn't fuck her with a stolen dick.

Nor would I.

She's an odious bitch, but I'm still on the fence regarding just how she's odious. Option 1: She really believes the shit she says. Or option 2: She's a cynical money-grubbing opportunist who sells a public persona to idiots.

In the case of a guy like Sean Hannity, I'm prepared to believe he's really stupid enough to believe his own drivel. But Coulter? I don't know. I suspect she just laughs all the way to the bank.

But yeah . . . stolen dick, leprous dick, or otherwise . . . no chance!

[Anomalocaris]

Can't stand Ann Coulter. I wouldn't fuck her with a stolen dick.

Nor would I.

She's an odious bitch, but I'm still on the fence regarding just how she's odious. Option 1: She really believes the shit she says. Or option 2: She's a cynical money-grubbing opportunist who sells a public persona to idiots.

In the case of a guy like Sean Hannity, I'm prepared to believe he's really stupid enough to believe his own drivel. But Coulter? I don't know. I suspect she just laughs all the way to the bank.

But yeah . . . stolen dick, leprous dick, or otherwise . . . no chance!

If by stolen, you mean ripped off of the original owner, then there are a great many dicks I would ripped off of their original owners to shove down the festering sewer that is Ann Coulter's cunt. Starting with Hannity's.

[Edwardo Piet]

She's an odious bitch, but I'm still on the fence regarding just how she's odious. Option 1: She really believes the shit she says. Or option 2: She's a cynical money-grubbing opportunist who sells a public persona to idiots.

I pick Option 3: Who gives a shit if it's option 1 or 2 -- because she's an unfuckable shitstain of a woman either way.

---

Nor would I.

She's an odious bitch, but I'm still on the fence regarding just how she's odious. Option 1: She really believes the shit she says. Or option 2: She's a cynical money-grubbing opportunist who sells a public persona to idiots.

In the case of a guy like Sean Hannity, I'm prepared to believe he's really stupid enough to believe his own drivel. But Coulter? I don't know. I suspect she just laughs all the way to the bank.

But yeah . . . stolen dick, leprous dick, or otherwise . . . no chance!

If by stolen, you mean ripped off of the original owner, then there are a great many dicks I would ripped off of their original owners to shove down the festering sewer that is Ann Coulter's cunt.

If you talk about her front-bottom sewage hole like that, you make her sound actually comparatively attractive. Best not to mislead people.

[Brian37]

Ramen.




As far as the fuckers are concerned it worked just fine.

This is what the rust belt and working class and working poor of middle America don't fucking get. The GOP since Reagan have used cold war slurs and identity politics to protect corporate welfare. Liberals would love nothing more to leave race out of it, but we cant because the top and the far right have organized over  decades to pit urban poor and rural poor and middle class against each other. 

There was between 1945-till Reagan points were the effective tax rate on the uber rich 90% with deductions ending up being 50% depending on year.  That revenue generated by taxing the rich build our highway system, GI bill and created the rust belt factories and an economic boom. 

Ann is right for once, but for very selfish and opportunistic reasons. But I am glad she slipped and actually told the truth. The rich will not use the tax cuts to create jobs, they will simply put the money they don't pay in taxes in off shore accounts to collect interest. They have not been the party of Lincoln or even Teddy for eons. 

Ann gave away the ghost on this one. Really she is saying, "Damn it, you wont be able to sucker gullible religious people out of their own money unless you focus on racism and white persecution."

[GUBU]

I was with the IRS in 1986 when St. Reagan the Fucktard last "simplified" the tax code.  They added 800 pages.  I was still a fairly new union official at that time and I recall one older revenue agent walking in to the union office with two books:  The old Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the new revised Code of 1986.  The "simplified" one was a good 3/4 of an inch thicker and he laughed and said "I'm too old to learn this much more bullshit.  Where do I get the papers to retire?"

Do you know why the tax lawyers and accountants added so many pages to the code? When you make laws complex you create loopholes, some of which you could drive a carriage and eight through. Now in most areas of the law intent puts paid to loopholes, for example if you find a loophole which allows you kill your worst enemy, the intent to do him harm and kill him is still enough to ensure that you can get fried, yet in business law (and taxes in particular) intent cannot be used to close a loophole.

[dyresand]

Yeah, you'd the the bush tax cuts and recession would be a little too fresh in people's minds for the GOP to be willing to try it again.

Seriously? They don't learn from their mistakes.

They are the dogs that caught the god damn bus. They chased and chased it and chased it now they have have it. And 
that being said well the economy is going to crash.