(November 20, 2017 at 9:11 am)GRANDIZER Wrote: (November 20, 2017 at 8:48 am)suni_muslim Wrote: Who decides that this is a mistake
The stupid theory writer
Is that the writer ignored the mistake
As long as it is without the control of anyone
Absurd
If you must find billions of mistakes
So that these qualities combine together
You must find a billion * billion wrong possibility
So we get the correct
The theoretical writer ignored all that
There are no errors in pooling characteristics common to all neighborhoods
This means having a programmer
Supervised the evolution plan
.....
Who's the theory writer? And when did they say anything about errors or mistakes with respect to evolution? Mutations are more like random changes rather than mistakes/errors.
So whatever it is you're saying here overall is irrelevant.
Quote:For the Koran
True texts
Not an explanation
This text
In Surat Al Noor
Talk about darkness in the deep seabed
Darkness above some
If you get out your hand
It is impossible to see it
There's nothing remarkable about that being in the Qur'an. It's clearly something thought up by human beings who made observations and/or easily made speculations based on such observations. You don't need to be a scientist to suspect darkness in the depths of the waters or wherever.
Quote:The text of the rotation of the earth is mentioned in Surat Al-Naml from the Holy Qur'an
He said to you that you see the mountain static
But in fact he is moving
As the clouds move
Even if that was a valid interpretation of the verse you're referring to, it's still nothing remarkable. But the funny thing is that the verse isn't at all saying that the mountains are moving. It's referring to the future times when even the mountains will pass away. It's referring to the end of days, not to some remarkable scientific fact that could only have been confirmed by today's science. Shaking my head at you, I am.
For evolution
Mutations as long as they occur only after the combined bivalent qualities common to all organisms
This gives a programmer presence
Because randomness will carry errors
As long as the randomization occurred after the billion-person pool commonality among all neighborhoods
If there is a programmer
There is no Creator
For the Koran
You say that prognosis
I do not agree with you my friend
The human mind can never imagine these things
Because the mind is incredible that a man has returned to life after his death
If the human mind can not predict such things as the rotation of the earth
Or dark ocean floor
Or even tell you many other things
Of which you are when you go out into space
Your chest will tighten like magic
Your eyes will clog
The scientific facts prove the same
If you go into space without a space suit
Your eyes will be blocked by gas bubbles
It will tighten your chest and your whole body as the magic symptom
For any that speaks of mountains
My friend this word is correct
It talks about current time
There are also others
Such a verse
You talk about moving mountains
These words my friend can not guess
Start
If you put a book over the library
How do I know that
But with two possibilities
Either tell me that
Or look for myself and climb to the top of the library and look at it
So, by logic, Muhammad can only know that by exploring or God is telling him
(November 20, 2017 at 9:21 am)Lomd Wrote: (November 20, 2017 at 8:22 am)suni_muslim Wrote: "Even your words, which you say is a path, a path and a map taken by life to get to this point that we are now (who reads the theories find infinite accuracy in drawing the plan Haha as if his books is the most honorable of the universe).مع أطيب التحيات زملائي
Unfortunately, this OP is not nearly clear enough to properly answer.
It seems to be an appeal to some form of aesthetical argument. Perhaps some variant of the Watchmaker Analogy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_analogy
In any case, I assure you that there is nothing in Muslim doctrine that would seem convincing as evidence for the existence of Ibrahim's conception of God. Let alone Muhammad's.
I have noticed that few if any Muslims have a working understanding of what atheism is.
My friend
Please think logically
Please
It meets between all beings a billion attributes
These qualities evolved from a cell
After the combination of these characteristics occurred randomness
As long as there are no errors in the pool of binary qualities between objects never
This means that there is a programmer to handle the errors
Because the errors and the anomalies were shown only after the pooling qualities
If it was absurd
You must find a billion * billion error
To get this common right
As long as there are no errors
Inevitably there is one who has handled mistakes
There is definitely a programmer
There is inevitably a Creator
There is evidence but you are not looking at it
There is much in the religion of the Prophet Muhammad
Prove his credibility
Tell him about these things like the rotation of the earth
And dark at the bottom of the ocean
And clogged eyes when ascending into space
And the sky is not stones
It is a gas
At the moment we know about it
That the sky is not empty space
We live in a bubble full of gas
These things can not be guessed if it is honest
And as long as Muhammad says this talk the word of God
He is sincere
This means that God owns the world
Why?
I'll tell you why
If I tell you that there is an underground book at a depth of 12 kilometers
I dug and found the book
If the book is regal
Because I tell you about the place of the book, it is my royal guide to the book
And tell him about the characteristics of the earth
Is the evidence of God's possession of earth
Greetings brother
(November 20, 2017 at 9:24 am)منظمة العفو الدولية ماجي Wrote: (November 20, 2017 at 8:55 am)suni_muslim Wrote: There is inevitably the Creator
Because it is impossible not to develop an error
Without preventing anyone from occurring
If it is absurd
Then there will be billion billion plus the wrong possibility
So we get the correct probability
Which is the most common characteristic of all objects
Common sense says that there is a programmer
Musharraf supervised this
If it develops there is a programmer on
Although there is no evolution
There is a creator
In all cases there
the creator
أسلوب الكتابة لديك يعطيني صداعا. كما أنني تواجه صعوبة في فهم ما تكتبه، ما هي الأخطاء التي تتحدث عنها؟ ننظر في جميع الكواكب الحق في نظامنا الشمسي التي هي غير مضياف إلى الحياة لدينا، هل تقول أن هذا هو الطريق الصحيح أو خطأ / خطأ؟ معظم الكواكب لديها "احتمال خاطئ" لنموذج حياتنا، لهذا السبب نحن عالقون حتى الآن على هذه الصخرة الصغيرة.
الحس السليم يقول الكثير من الأشياء، وهذا لا يجعلها صحيحة. حسي السليم يقول أنك بو، أنا صحيح؟
Everything is arranged for us
All planets have no life
Life is just here
If there is a grade
This is to talk about the ocean and the environment in which we live
But to talk about ourselves
Cell development and natural selection
Intellectually wrong
If we call random evolution
Because randomness is not arranged
As long as the randomization did not appear until after the billion-character pool among living organisms
If they were random
We have to find a billion-billion-plus false probability
So we get the right thing we see
As long as there is no error
If there is a programmer
Avoid errors
There was certainly a Creator
Greetings