Posts: 1355
Threads: 20
Joined: June 28, 2017
Reputation:
17
Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 4:23 pm
You and your partner in crime from AF have had a good run robbing girl scouts of their cookies, but unfortunately you've both been arrested and are being interrogated by the police. You have no way to communicate with your partner in crime. The cops don't have enough evidence to convict either you or your partner of the serious charge of cookie theft unless there is a testimony against you. However, they do have enough evidence to get you for the lesser crime of loitering with intent to steal cookies, if they so choose. Your partner is in the same situation.
The cops offer you a deal, and you have 2 options: either testify against your partner, or remain silent.
- If you and your partner both take the deal and testify against each other, you both get 2 years in prison.
- If one of you testifies against the other, the one who testifies gets to walk (0 years in prison). However, the one convicted will get 3 years in prison.
- If both of you remain silent, you both get 1 year in prison.
People like to discuss this problem ad infintum, but there's no time for that until you've made your decision. You're in the prisoner's dilemma right now.
What do you do?
Please answer the poll before discussing or reading what others would do in this situation. I want to see how people answer this without communicating with each other about strategy, as the classic problem specifies! This way we can also get an idea of whether we chose right or not as individuals.
Once you've answered feel free to discuss the problem.
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 4:42 pm
Stay silent. I won't have to feel horrible about myself for turning on my partner, and I would trust my partner not to turn me in either.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 9176
Threads: 76
Joined: November 21, 2013
Reputation:
40
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 4:59 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2017 at 5:03 pm by Chad32.)
I wouldn't want to be the guy that sent my partner down the river, while he loyally remained silent. I'd keep quiet. Of course I'd expect the cops to say my partner was singing like a bird, and tell my partner I was doing the same, but I can't help that. Just stay silent, and hope for the best.
I do have to take into consideration that if I testify, and he doesn't, he's still getting out in three years. And everyone we know that's in the business knows me for a snitch that can't be worked with. I sit in there for three years, and I'm basically a martyr. Or a schmuck, depending on what other people think.
Posts: 1355
Threads: 20
Joined: June 28, 2017
Reputation:
17
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 5:05 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2017 at 5:07 pm by shadow.)
(November 24, 2017 at 4:42 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Stay silent. I won't have to feel horrible about myself for turning on my partner, and I would trust my partner not to turn me in either.
So far I'm pretty glad with these results because I would do the same! In this kind of situation I would assume goodwill from both parties.
That being said, it would heavily depend who my partner is. Someone like my sister there would be zero question in my mind that we'd both stay silent. If I were paired with someone who I though was selfish, though, I might choose to betray them. I was reading about this and technically the optimal strategy, mathematically, is to betray your partner every time. But IRL when they've studied this people are naturally more prone to cooperating.
(November 24, 2017 at 4:59 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I do have to take into consideration that if I testify, and he doesn't, he's still getting out in three years. And everyone we know that's in the business knows me for a snitch that can't be worked with. I sit in there for three years, and I'm basically a martyr. Or a schmuck, depending on what other people think.
Oh, I believe one assumption of the problem is supposed to be that there is no way for the person to retaliate or for there to be any punishment / impact on reputation for what you choose.
Posts: 30673
Threads: 2117
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 5:13 pm
We are talking about crime here, not war. I don't care if it is even family, the people that love and value you would never ask you to commit a crime.
Even in war, it is easy to say what someone would do in speculating, in reality we are a far more messy and complex species.
Posts: 9176
Threads: 76
Joined: November 21, 2013
Reputation:
40
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 6:06 pm
(November 24, 2017 at 5:05 pm)shadow Wrote: (November 24, 2017 at 4:59 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I do have to take into consideration that if I testify, and he doesn't, he's still getting out in three years. And everyone we know that's in the business knows me for a snitch that can't be worked with. I sit in there for three years, and I'm basically a martyr. Or a schmuck, depending on what other people think.
Oh, I believe one assumption of the problem is supposed to be that there is no way for the person to retaliate or for there to be any punishment / impact on reputation for what you choose.
Well, I'd still choose to keep quiet. I'm just a good guy like that. Though I have been taken advantage of for being gullible before, at least that's not something I have to have on my conscience.
Posts: 66329
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 6:18 pm
Snitches get stitches, Shadow. 
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 1355
Threads: 20
Joined: June 28, 2017
Reputation:
17
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 6:29 pm
(November 24, 2017 at 6:18 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Snitches get stitches, Shadow.
Sure, especially when I don't make the poll anonymous 
Posts: 2435
Threads: 21
Joined: May 5, 2017
Reputation:
26
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 7:07 pm
I see a real world problem in scenario 2.
"If one of you testifies against the other, the one who testifies gets to walk (0 years in prison). However, the one convicted will get 3 years in prison."
Is it not likely the three year guy will now change his testimony and now both of them are heading for the nick? Or is this angle not part of the dilemma.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Posts: 1355
Threads: 20
Joined: June 28, 2017
Reputation:
17
RE: Poll: You're in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
November 24, 2017 at 7:14 pm
(November 24, 2017 at 7:07 pm)Succubus Wrote: I see a real world problem in scenario 2.
"If one of you testifies against the other, the one who testifies gets to walk (0 years in prison). However, the one convicted will get 3 years in prison."
Is it not likely the three year guy will now change his testimony and now both of them are heading for the nick? Or is this angle not part of the dilemma.
No, you can't change your testimony. The whole point is that you have to make the decision without knowing what the other person is going to choose, and you're not able to respond to their choice.
|
