|
[Serious] PSA: Rape Apologetics
|
He joined another atheist forum (that I am a member of) many months ago, and got biffed for preaching by an admin. He disappeared so I thought maybe he had been banned. But he just "discovered" that he's a member over there and is making a nuisance of himself already. His stuff will likely end up in the "Dump Pile of Crazy Troll Posts".
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
It's a real joy.
The banning is most likely a mere fortification for his beliefs: they banned me because they couldn't handle the truth.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter  (July 14, 2021 at 10:50 pm)Foxaire Wrote: The banning is most likely a mere fortification for his beliefs: they banned me because they couldn't handle the truth. I think it bothers him quite a bit. He's been here today under another name. Perhaps this is the only place he hasn't been kicked out of...until now. “If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius 
I would suggest a captcha for personality disorders, like identify the picture with other people's perspectives. But that could seriously limit content.
We all saw enough to know the guy's a whack job. Rattle his cage and he barks for days.   (July 14, 2021 at 12:59 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(July 14, 2021 at 11:45 am)HappySkeptic Wrote: I agree that there should be rules around trolling behavior, but Drich wasn't trolling. He was serious. That’s a slippery slope when one of the main reasons I see in a lot of intros on this forum is trauma from religious guilt and fear. Replace sexual assault with religion and that would make a case for having no believers on the forums.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari (July 15, 2021 at 9:52 am)tackattack Wrote:(July 14, 2021 at 12:59 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: No, they won’t. But members of the forum who are survivors of sexual assault shouldn’t have to be subjected to his harmful rhetoric. Being religious obviously isn't a reason to be excluded from this forum and never has been. “If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
I’m aware it hasn’t been, I was just remarking on the slipperiness of said slope.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari (July 15, 2021 at 10:33 am)tackattack Wrote: I’m aware it hasn’t been, I was just remarking on the slipperiness of said slope. Looking back over your remarks it seems you may think Drich's comments should have been allowed. The topic of rape apologetics has been coming up more frequently on the forum in the last few months...should we have continued to let it build? How do you think things should have been handled? You aren't the only one here who seems to think the topic should be given a pass. “If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
