Lol. Yep, Drich. You got it, man. And everybody that reads both that thread and that mangled ass post knows it.

Is there an intelligent man or woman now in the world who believes in the Garden of Eden story? If you find any man who believes it, strike his forehead and you will hear an echo. Something is for rent.
-- Robert Green Ingersoll, "Orthodoxy" (1884)

(July 23, 2015 at 11:04 pm)Drich Wrote: Read Genesis 3. It did not say the snake walk on his legs. It said the snake was cursed to crawl on its belly and eat dust.

The same dust that Adam and Eve were created from? Of course this is just a clarification of earlier reports suggesting God brought an animal circus to town tempting Adam with a helpmeet before Adam told God to fuck off and only then did the Almighty create a woman from a rib. You must realize that the dust story doesn't clarify shit.

The story in Genesis reports that the snake talks. Where in this fossil does the 'snake' have a larynx? So much for science proving your fantasy. Other apes have proven a 500 word vocabulary through signs; however, they can't be vocalized because of the throat position of the larynx. Other apes have them, but can't speak; snakes don't have them.

Alas, the fossil being paraded proves evolution and not the Bible. Amusing though; talking snake fucks over another.

Funny how a Middle Eastern god was talking about snakes in Brazil that one time.

*giggle-snort*

(July 23, 2015 at 11:03 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Drippy, there is nothing you post worth reading once...let alone twice.

I don't mind. I usually find at least 2 extra fallacies the second time around!

Snakes, fish, birds everything has/had limbs... what is the point of finding the obvious? This is like claiming parrots mimicking human speech is a proof of talking animals in genesis..

Co opt science when convenient, call the whole thing a conspiracy which proves nothing when it's not.

(July 23, 2015 at 10:34 pm)Drich Wrote: All this story does for me is to poop on those who I've argued in the past who claim snakes never had legs therefore the story of the legged snake in the garden is yet another 'proof' that the Genesis account is false. That's it that's all.

This is just one more piece of a greater puzzle.

Yeah, pooping is pretty much all you do hereabouts. Well, genius, most of us are actually interested in new findings. Dogmatism is rather found on your side of the spectrum.

(July 24, 2015 at 12:07 am)Cato Wrote:

(July 23, 2015 at 11:04 pm)Drich Wrote: Read Genesis 3. It did not say the snake walk on his legs. It said the snake was cursed to crawl on its belly and eat dust.

The same dust that Adam and Eve were created from? Of course this is just a clarification of earlier reports suggesting God brought an animal circus to town tempting Adam with a helpmeet before Adam told God to fuck off and only then did the Almighty create a woman from a rib. You must realize that the dust story doesn't clarify shit.

The story in Genesis reports that the snake talks. Where in this fossil does the 'snake' have a larynx? So much for science proving your fantasy. Other apes have proven a 500 word vocabulary through signs; however, they can't be vocalized because of the throat position of the larynx. Other apes have them, but can't speak; snakes don't have them.

Alas, the fossil being paraded proves evolution and not the Bible. Amusing though; talking snake fucks over another.

In the movie shriek a donkey and ginger bread man speak... So when did animated characters develop a larynx?
-or are you just unfamiliar with the concept of a voice over?

If we can voice to animated pictures well enough to create an illusion that generates hundreds of millions of dollars, how then does it become unthinkable when a more advanced being does it to us?