(September 4, 2015 at 7:42 pm)abaris Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 7:35 pm)Shuffle Wrote: I am not talking about attacks. Jesus Christ, why are people not getting that?! I am talking about DEATHS. Fuck.

Based on fucking what? That two steaming piles of website you posted?

Based on you not being able to tell me the last 5 DEATHS caused by non-muslim terrorists that happened.

(September 4, 2015 at 7:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 7:00 pm)Shuffle Wrote: I said that 99% of DEATHS by terrorism are caused by muslims in the entire WORLD. You preceded to give me stats that showed ATTACKS by terrorism in AMERICA. That is not the same thing. And how are those sites biased. They are giving legitimate accounts of terrorism happening in the world, one by one. You gave me a pie chart.

When you can present unbiased sources, I may well lend you credence. I've read both of those sites at times and found them to be untrustworthy. For instance, they don't count the deaths of Arab civilians caused by Israeli attacks, and that would certainly change your percentage. I wonder why they--and you -- don't count them?

And that wiki has obvious problems that its own editors acknowledge.


What we're left with, then, is an unsupported claim.

And your colorful, irrelevant pie chart is?

(September 4, 2015 at 7:36 pm)Shuffle Wrote: And why are you being so mean? I agree with 90% of the things that you have said in this thread. We give kudos to the same posts. Just because you have now found an atheist that disagrees with you on a single point, you cuss him out and say he can't read.

It really hurts my feelings.

Your reading comprehension sucks. Me saying "believe it or not, people have lives outside of this forum" in no way implies or says that I thought you have no life. You projected that onto what I said. It was a response to you assuming people were deliberately ignoring your posts.

How can you ask why "I'm being mean" (baby want a bottle?) when you were the one who bitched about people ignoring your posts because they didn't respond in less than 24 hours to a post you made. So I respond by basically telling you that people have lives outside of the forum, hence why people don't immediately respond to every post you make, then you get all funny and say "says the guy with 3 months on here". You started this stupidity.

I really couldn't give a fuck whether you agree with 90% of the things I do nor could I give a fuck whether you're an atheist. Your reading comprehension fails and you keep banging on that 99% of terrorism is caused by Islam when it's demonstrably not and myself and several others have literally proven so to you. Then you have the nerve to moan like people are ignoring your fucking points when they're not and flat out insult me.

But I'm the asshole? Whatever.

(September 4, 2015 at 7:48 pm)Shuffle Wrote: Based on you not being able to tell me the last 5 DEATHS caused by non-muslim terrorists that happened.

I could, if I could be arsed to do your research. But as it happens I don't give a shit, since you only had to access information from serious sources. Just like we do. It's here on these boards, posted by me and others when we still thought, types like you were at all interested.

So if you wanna know, do a search. I highly doubt that though.

Oh, and from now on I'll be really mean and ignore your posts. Until you decide to get an informed opinion.

(September 4, 2015 at 7:52 pm)abaris Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 7:48 pm)Shuffle Wrote: Based on you not being able to tell me the last 5 DEATHS caused by non-muslim terrorists that happened.

I could, if I could be arsed to do your research. But as it happens I don't give a shit, since you only had to access information from serious sources. Just like we do. It's here on these boards, posted by me and others when we still thought, types like you were at all interested.

So if you wanna know, do a search. I highly doubt that though.

Oh, and from now on I'll be really mean and ignore your posts. Until you decide to get an informed opinion.

Ok, I looked it up, and I found one. The first one in this article says that a Christian Extremist killed 6 people at a Sikh Temple, on August 5, 2012. I couldn't find one more recent.

(September 4, 2015 at 7:50 pm)Napoléon Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 7:36 pm)Shuffle Wrote: And why are you being so mean? I agree with 90% of the things that you have said in this thread. We give kudos to the same posts. Just because you have now found an atheist that disagrees with you on a single point, you cuss him out and say he can't read.

It really hurts my feelings.

Your reading comprehension sucks. Me saying "believe it or not, people have lives outside of this forum" in no way implies or says that I thought you have no life. You projected that onto what I said. It was a response to you assuming people were deliberately ignoring your posts.

How can you ask why "I'm being mean" (baby want a bottle?) when you were the one who bitched about people ignoring your posts because they didn't respond in less than 24 hours to a post you made. So I respond by basically telling you that people have lives outside of the forum, hence why people don't immediately respond to every post you make, then you get all funny and say "says the guy with 3 months on here". You started this stupidity.

I really couldn't give a fuck whether you agree with 90% of the things I do nor could I give a fuck whether you're an atheist. Your reading comprehension fails and you keep banging on that 99% of terrorism is caused by Islam when it's demonstrably not and myself and several others have literally proven so to you. Then you have the nerve to moan like people are ignoring your fucking points when they're not and flat out insult me.

But I'm the asshole? Whatever.

Well, obviously you have gone into some kind of hulk rage mode that I can not get you out of. You might need to take some kind of medication to calm down, because, currently, you are way to angry to function. Calm down, it's ok. Every little thing, is gonna be alright.

(September 4, 2015 at 8:11 pm)Shuffle Wrote: Well, obviously you have gone into some kind of hulk rage mode that I can not get you out of. You might need to take some kind of medication to calm down, because, currently, you are way to angry to function. Calm down, it's ok. Every little thing, is gonna be alright.

I'm perfectly calm, but clearly a few swear words that only serve to illustrate a very basic point are too much for your sensitivities.

Ironic that a guy who bangs on about people ignoring his points, failed to actually address any point made by someone rebutting his own stupidity. Instead this guy chooses to go "oh no, hulk rage mode, derp derp calm down" like anyone's actually angry, all the while being a condescending asshole and acting surprised that he's called one.

(September 4, 2015 at 7:48 pm)Shuffle Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 7:42 pm)abaris Wrote: Based on fucking what? That two steaming piles of website you posted?

Based on you not being able to tell me the last 5 DEATHS caused by non-muslim terrorists that happened.

Haven't you heard of Anders Brejvik? That was what, 78 in one incident. There's your five and then some.

Maybe you've heard of Ted Kaszcinski, or Sendero Luminoso, or the Tamil Tigers? All terrorists for one cause or another, death tolls ranging into the thousands, all within the last 25 years, and not a one of them Muslim. Shit, I didn't have to even google that. Inform yourself, kid, seriously.

(September 4, 2015 at 7:48 pm)Shuffle Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 7:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: When you can present unbiased sources, I may well lend you credence. I've read both of those sites at times and found them to be untrustworthy. For instance, they don't count the deaths of Arab civilians caused by Israeli attacks, and that would certainly change your percentage. I wonder why they--and you -- don't count them?

And that wiki has obvious problems that its own editors acknowledge.


What we're left with, then, is an unsupported claim.

And your colorful, irrelevant pie chart is?

Had you read the entirety of my post, you would have definitely learnt that that chart was based on the FBI statistics, to which I also linked.

It's apparent you're not interested in discussion. I'm tiring of your being deliberately obtuse.

(September 4, 2015 at 9:27 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:

(September 4, 2015 at 7:48 pm)Shuffle Wrote: Based on you not being able to tell me the last 5 DEATHS caused by non-muslim terrorists that happened.

Haven't you heard of Anders Brejvik? That was what, 78 in one incident.  There's your five and then some.

Maybe you've heard of Ted Kaszcinski, or Sendero Luminoso, or the Tamil Tigers? All terrorists for one cause or another, death tolls ranging into the thousands, all within the last 25 years, and not a one of them Muslim. Shit, I didn't have to even google that. Inform yourself, kid, seriously.

I love how you can name individual terrorists, as if you can do that with Muslims.

Haven't you heard of 9/11? That was what, 2,977 in one incident. That's your 5 and then 2,972 more.

Maybe you've heard of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Shabaab, and Taliban? All terrorists for Islam, death tolls ranging in the tens of thousands, all within last week, and all of them Muslim. Shit, I didn't have to even google that. Inform yourself, kid, seriously.