(January 17, 2016 at 3:07 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote:

(January 16, 2016 at 7:27 pm)Beccs Wrote: As I stated a few pages back, I wear what I'm comfortable in and what the situation demands, not to attract the attention of men.

Now ask yourself WHY the various religions demand 'modesty' of women while not applting the same rule to men?  Is it, perhaps, that those religions were created and run by "men"?

No, it's because women can't and won't generally attack a man because he is wearing what he thinks is comfortable. When was the last time you heard of a woman literally raping a man. It's kind of impossible

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

So men will generally attack women for what they are wearing?

(January 17, 2016 at 2:37 pm)Iroscato Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 2:33 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: That is a foolish thing to say. Who has a problem with admiring beauty?

Not me.

The problem is in the advertisement of the goods. Say your in the grocery store and see some food you like. You may justify not buying it for whatever reason. But then a couple aisles over there are free samples. Well you love that food and here it is right here for the taking. You gonna get some.

It may or may not boil down to seeking attention to some women. But what it boils down to for some men is that if one caries themself in a certain way, then indeed, they must be that way.

It isn't dressing like a whore that men have a problem with. The problem is that according to some women, it is false advertisement. That can lead to many negative things, least of which isn't forced rape or prison.

The female body has potential to be priceless artwork. I for one admire art generally at a distance. Some like a more hands on approach. Some women apparently like it too judging by their general demeanor these days.

So I guess if your promiscuous then dress accordingly, and if not dress accordingly. Or if you feel the need to fantasize about being a whore then don't get bent out a shape when someone wants to take you up on your insinuated offer.

2¢

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

The fact that you compared women to a grocery store kind of headshots the credibility of the rest of your post there, pops. The rest of the post just teabags the bloodied corpse.

What I didn't compare them to is masterful beautiful artwork. Because they are. Not in comparison but in literal observation.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(January 17, 2016 at 3:07 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote:

(January 16, 2016 at 7:27 pm)Beccs Wrote: As I stated a few pages back, I wear what I'm comfortable in and what the situation demands, not to attract the attention of men.

Now ask yourself WHY the various religions demand 'modesty' of women while not applting the same rule to men? Is it, perhaps, that those religions were created and run by "men"?

No, it's because women can't and won't generally attack a man because he is wearing what he thinks is comfortable. When was the last time you heard of a woman literally raping a man. It's kind of impossible

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

That's sexist to men. Men are not horny 24/7 and don't want to have sex with every single woman they meet. It is of course possible for a woman to rape a man and there have been a couple louder cases, along with many that probably went unreported. This is bullshit you're spewing.

(January 17, 2016 at 3:09 pm)Heat Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 3:02 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: Look out ladies, don't let pops catch a glimpse of your ass cheek, you are tempting him to rape you.

Nobody said this. You said it.

"Men aren't really at risk of getting raped by a woman because his Ass cheek or ball is exposed." -pops

Implying that women are at risk of getting raped if their ass cheek is exposed.

Exactly what he was saying.

(January 17, 2016 at 3:02 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: Look out ladies, don't let pops catch a glimpse of your ass cheek, you are tempting him to rape you.

I can control myself and admire from a distance. In a non abrasive manner.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(January 17, 2016 at 3:07 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote:

(January 16, 2016 at 7:27 pm)Beccs Wrote: As I stated a few pages back, I wear what I'm comfortable in and what the situation demands, not to attract the attention of men.

Now ask yourself WHY the various religions demand 'modesty' of women while not applting the same rule to men?  Is it, perhaps, that those religions were created and run by "men"?

No, it's because women can't and won't generally attack a man because he is wearing what he thinks is comfortable. When was the last time you heard of a woman literally raping a man. It's kind of impossible

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

Fairly recently, actually.

I can't find a link to it.

And, frankly, if a guy is going to rape someone it generally doesn't matter what she's wearing.

I have read of multiple cases where pos rapists have broken into a home and raped 80 + year old women.

I'm pretty damned sure they weren't dressed "provocatively"

(January 17, 2016 at 3:12 pm)Vic Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 3:07 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: No, it's because women can't and won't generally attack a man because he is wearing what he thinks is comfortable. When was the last time you heard of a woman literally raping a man. It's kind of impossible

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

That's sexist to men. Men are not horny 24/7 and don't want to have sex with every single woman they meet. It is of course possible for a woman to rape a man and there have been a couple louder cases, along with many that probably went unreported. This is bullshit you're spewing.

No. A man cannot have intercourse without arousal. It just doesn't work that way. Sexist to men? Now I have heard it all. Next your gonna say I'm not being politically correct, as if that has any significance.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(January 17, 2016 at 3:07 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: No, it's because women can't and won't generally attack a man because he is wearing what he thinks is comfortable. When was the last time you heard of a woman literally raping a man. It's kind of impossible.[...]

A rufie and a viagra - presto, dumbass. And/or she can stick a pencil up the urethra. Or a finger on the prostate. Also - pegging seems to be getting quite popular nowadays. Nothing's impossible. And anyway - if you dress like a slut - you can always be raped by a homosexual dude, or a few. Like those slutty catholic boys, pr*ck-teasing the priests - because god forgot to tell them how to dress modestly...

So maybe you SHOULD take care of how much of that scrumptious bod you're showing off - especially with all those new pro-gay laws. You might wake up married to some middle-aged dude in shorts. And you'll only have yourself to blame, you little hussy...

(January 17, 2016 at 3:17 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 3:12 pm)Vic Wrote: That's sexist to men. Men are not horny 24/7 and don't want to have sex with every single woman they meet. It is of course possible for a woman to rape a man and there have been a couple louder cases, along with many that probably went unreported. This is bullshit you're spewing.

No. A man cannot have intercourse without arousal. It just doesn't work that way. Sexist to men? Now I have heard it all. Next your gonna say I'm not being politically correct, as if that has any significance.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

What does arousal have to do with consent? An erection is a physiological matter, and quite often happens involuntarily. If you believe that a man will consent at any time to an intercourse with any woman, you are seriously confused.

As an aside, I don't give a shit about political correctness. It's not my fault you believe harmful stereotypes.

(January 17, 2016 at 3:17 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 3:12 pm)Vic Wrote: That's sexist to men. Men are not horny 24/7 and don't want to have sex with every single woman they meet. It is of course possible for a woman to rape a man and there have been a couple louder cases, along with many that probably went unreported. This is bullshit you're spewing.

No. A man cannot have intercourse without arousal. It just doesn't work that way. Sexist to men? Now I have heard it all. Next your gonna say I'm not being politically correct, as if that has any significance.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

You are an idiot.