(January 20, 2016 at 9:54 am)Nestor Wrote:

(December 20, 2015 at 12:17 pm)Drich Wrote: So your good with someone else doing your thinking for you?

The wiki arrival does not even address the evid need provided.

The second focuses on the improbability that conventional wisdom and dates can not be wrong.

What both fail to address is what the film does do very well. Provide archeological evid nice for the Joseph, Joseph's saving Egypt from a 7 year drout Joseph's grave the grave to his twelve brothers. The city where the family of Joseph grew into the nation of Israel. The evidences for the enslavement, the evidences for all the 1 born males being slaughtered in the time of Moses. The Egyptian papyrus that describes the plagues, the written Egyptian evidence for the exodus. The loss of their army. The destruction of Jericho 40 years later and on and on and on...

So there's that. The only thing holding back verification is our current perception of egypts time line.

You articals claim that what this film doesn't do is offer anything new. Let me ask you then. When you all say their is absolutely nothing in egypts history that shows Jews being slaves to Egypt, why is the information provided in this film omitted? Even if it does not fit the current time line their is proof of Jewish enslavement and exodus.

You do realize that the stories related to Joseph, such as the episode involving Potipher's wife, and the seven year droughts in Egypt, are derived from earlier non-biblical sources, in which the characters, places, and situations are differently portrayed, and not original to the Hebrews, right?

Did you know if you watched the film, they show you evidence of the drought, the consolidation of power under pharaoh genesis describes, and constructed waterway/reservoir created in the middle kingdom that has and has been accredited/named after Joseph, Joseph's home, tomb, and statue of him, along with that the courtyard/tomb where his 12 brothers were also buried All in Archeological record along with written Egyptian accounts?

(January 20, 2016 at 9:43 am)Drich Wrote:

(January 19, 2016 at 4:03 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I shall have to find the strength within myself to survive, won't I?

Now you know what I feel when you tell me your removing your 'hedge of protection' and I'm on my own.

Yeahhh - in your eternal quest to have the final snarky word, you just can't let it lie can you?

I missed about 50 pages. Has Drich offered any proof yet?

He hasn't even offered any evidence that is credible.

(January 20, 2016 at 10:24 am)Drich Wrote: and constructed waterway/reservoir created in the middle kingdom that has and has been accredited/named after Joseph, Joseph's home, tomb, and statue of him, along with that the courtyard/tomb where his 12 brothers were also buried All in Archeological record along with written Egyptian accounts?

Unless this is a discovery that has been made in the past 40 years, there is no such archeological or documentary record... Which I know since I've reviewed literally every important record that in any way, shape, or form is related to the Old Testament, at least insofar as it was translated into English by the 1970s.

(January 21, 2016 at 2:52 am)Nestor Wrote:

(January 20, 2016 at 10:24 am)Drich Wrote: and constructed waterway/reservoir created in the middle kingdom that has and has been accredited/named after Joseph, Joseph's home, tomb, and statue of him, along with that the courtyard/tomb where his 12 brothers were also buried All in Archeological record along with written Egyptian accounts?

Unless this is a discovery that has been made in the past 40 years, there is no such archeological or documentary record... Which I know since I've reviewed literally every important record that in any way, shape, or form is related to the Old Testament, at least insofar as it was translated into English by the 1970s.

Watch the movie, the German Egyptologist/archeologist who was incharge of the dig site, was being interviewed and was processing material out of the ground as he was being questioned. (2013/2014)

(January 20, 2016 at 6:10 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: I missed about 50 pages. Has Drich offered any proof yet?

His name is proof enough, but not of what he said being possibly true.

(January 21, 2016 at 9:37 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(January 20, 2016 at 6:10 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: I missed about 50 pages. Has Drich offered any proof yet?

His name is proof enough, but not of what he said being possibly true.

... I must have missed how you refuted the literal Egyptian records, archeological digs and the other vetted materials this movie uses and compiles to establish it's claims. Can you please point me to the page and post number where you have actually done your research to show the monuments, papyrus, and the archeological finds this movie uses are not valid.

(January 21, 2016 at 9:47 am)Drich Wrote:

(January 21, 2016 at 9:37 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: His name is proof enough, but not of what he said being possibly true.

... I must have missed how you refuted the literal Egyptian records, archeological digs and the other vetted materials this movie uses and compiles to establish it's claims. Can you please point me to the page and post number where you have actually done your research to show the monuments, papyrus, and the archeological finds this movie uses are not valid.

Simple. A documentary made by a quack does not qualify as evidence of anything, which is why this work is in a movie and not a peer-reviewed publication.


Done. See? That was easy.