Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 2:13 pm
Just a random thought.
I think that we should be able to see other user's warning levels so we can gauge how much of a jerk they are. The benefits are that the higher their warning level, the closer they are to getting a ban hammer swung in their direction.
I know we have some real winners here but it would be interesting to see, if not simply for being curious and nosy.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 2:25 pm
We have a policy of not making warning actions or levels public, in the interest of not publicly shaming members.
I don't see that policy changing.
Posts: 6859
Threads: 50
Joined: September 14, 2014
Reputation:
44
RE: Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 2:32 pm
Warning levels should stay between staff and the member only. Knowing it won't contribute anything positive to the discussions but it can certainly effect our perception of a person and that'll hurt the community.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums
Slack 
(pester tibs via pm if you need invite)
Posts: 28283
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 3:25 pm
Sorry, I agree that warning levels should not be made public.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 3:26 pm
(This post was last modified: February 26, 2016 at 3:27 pm by abaris.)
What's the use of making it public, other than to shame that person? Judge for yourself if someone's a jerk.
Posts: 35273
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 3:35 pm
My warning level's at 99.
But you still like me, right?
:-(
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 3:43 pm
I think my HS friend said it best, when I came to school and bitched about crap in the news I had no control over, "Kill everyone and plant trees"(sarcasm)....... He was teasing me of course. Point being these guys run a pretty tight ship. I've been on lots of websites and social media pages over the years, and the ones I like being on the most are the ones who simply stick to staying out of it unless it is spam or real threats of violence.
It makes no sense to run a love fest ship if we proclaim that we are not sheep ourselves. If I wanted everyone to agree with me all the time, I would not be here.
Posts: 2985
Threads: 29
Joined: October 26, 2014
Reputation:
31
RE: Warning levels
February 26, 2016 at 3:46 pm
(February 26, 2016 at 3:41 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: (February 26, 2016 at 3:35 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: My warning level's at 99.
But you still like me, right?
:-(
Any level below 8000 is not a level at all
IT'S OVER 9000
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.
![[Image: tmPmhjd.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FtmPmhjd.jpg)
![[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-d-3rfdI7nG0%2FTerwtFyFXoI%2FAAAAAAAACak%2F7kFSmHeVrng%2Fs320%2FBumper%2BSticker%2B-%2BAsheville%2B-%2BPraise%2BDog3.JPG)
