(June 26, 2016 at 7:03 pm)Heatheness Wrote: Thanks for the info. Have a good one.

Just did.

Hmm...nice discussion you're having here...
Mind if I add something?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TN9FsOSWy8w

(June 26, 2016 at 7:20 pm)Stimbo Wrote:

(June 26, 2016 at 7:03 pm)Heatheness Wrote: Thanks for the info. Have a good one.

Just did.

Me too!

(June 25, 2016 at 8:47 pm)Rhythm Wrote: If a 16yr old female member posts a topless pic it's child porn, in a 16yr old male member posts a topless pic it's just a hot day.  The situation is, perhaps, unfair, but beyond our control and not subject to any given persons opinions, nor is it an ideological endorsement of any particular law by the boards.

The short answer to your question, would be "No".

Yeah.

Things aren't "NSFW" because AF members don't like them.  It's because looking at some things in some venues could cause problems.  Why would breasts cause problems?  Because in some countries, breasts under a certain age are forbidden. If the law is a double-standard, then that's what you have to work with.

(June 26, 2016 at 6:59 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Okay.

Boobie picture coming up.

Ban me, bastards!!

I literally did a report on "Blue-footed boobies" in grade 6 just so I could say "boobies."  My friends were suitably impressed with my cunning, and even my teacher kind of winked at me. Although, to be fair, I was unable to obtain a quality image of a PAIR of boobies such as these fine specimens.

(June 25, 2016 at 8:49 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I am all about women feeling free to go around showing breasts. It would make the world so much beautifull.

You've never met my grandmother.  Not all the free breasts will be those of sexy Brazilian beach volleyball players.

I'm against my grandmother ever being allowed to show her breasts to anyone, ever.  But I feel pretty much the same way about her legs.

(June 26, 2016 at 8:37 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:

(June 26, 2016 at 8:23 am)Little lunch Wrote: Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
All good, I finally got it, thanks Hammy. :-)

Oh lol. It still wasn't showing for me so I fixed it for you lol.

Still still doesn't show for me

(June 26, 2016 at 10:38 am)Heatheness Wrote:

(June 26, 2016 at 8:28 am)KUSA Wrote: All of this started at TTA over this picture.

Do you have his permission to repost his pic in another forum? Did you even ask? No, you did not.

And it not about this image, it's about the enforcement or lack thereof of a sexist rule. Too bad you are clueless.

Isn't that GirlyMan? If so I'm pretty sure that's an auto permission granted. Not that it matters. It's certainly not illegal to repost an image you find on the Internet.

The rule itself isn't sexist. No person regardless of gender is allowed to post pornography. It's not our fault if the legal definition for pornography is sexist.

(June 26, 2016 at 10:51 am)vorlon13 Wrote: I've always considered allowing mens to go topless and not womens to be a special perk for leering homos like me.

Not sure I would like to see that sensible policy changed.

Get outta here with that gay privilege!

(June 26, 2016 at 11:44 am)Whateverist the White Wrote:

(June 26, 2016 at 10:38 am)Heatheness Wrote: Do you have his permission to repost his pic in another forum? Did you even ask? No, you did not.

And it not about this image, it's about the enforcement or lack thereof of a sexist rule. Too bad you are clueless.

I demand to see some girly ones right now, if only to get that image out of my mind.  Come on girls, are you gonna let a dude do all the flaunting?  Show us what you're made of!

The most hilarious thing is that his username is Girly so you're already seeing some Girly ones