soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

So weak.  And you know that how?  Let me guess: same way you know the bible is the right holy book.

No introduction thread?

another drive-by-shitter? some kids seem to have way too much time on their hands these days

(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

Whoops, wrong again, creationists.

Quote:The reports of the soft tissue, though remarkable, have been sensationalized further. The tissues were not soft and pliable originally. The tissues were rehydrated in the process of removing the surrounding mineral components of the bone (Schweitzer et al. 2005). Moreover, it is unknown whether the soft tissues are original tissues. Fossil flexible tissues and nucleated cells have been found before in which the original material was not preserved (Stokstad 2005).

Quote:The age of fossils is not determined by how well they are preserved, because preservation depends far more on factors other than age. The age of this particular bone was determined from the age of the rocks it was found in, namely, the Hell Creek Formation. This formation has been reliably dated by several independent methods (Dalrymple 2000).

Bolding mine.

Looks like you haive failed us: perhaps you should consider a rewrite of the belief system that led you to be taken in by ideologically motivated lies?

Creatards hate facts the way a vampire hates sunlight.

Assholes.

(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

Even if your right about the bones, people still hate God in bible and other main religions. He demands people to give up their pride and earthly pleasure and surrender their lives to avoide possible torture.

(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

Two things: (1) You should spend more time learning about the science you dismiss without understanding, and (2) it's spelled "Christian", though I certainly approve of 'stain' in your case.

Now put down the "Good Book" and read a good book for a change.

(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

This in no way invalidates evolution. But even if it did the answer to how life came to be so complex would not be the impossible magic man of the bible.

(August 16, 2016 at 12:09 pm)purplepurpose Wrote:

(August 16, 2016 at 11:58 am)mersag Wrote: soft tissue in dinosaur bones is a problem for evolutionist. 
It's absolute proof dinosaurs are no way as old as they first thought.
Science has failed us and the science books should be rewritten.

Even if your right about the bones, people still hate God in bible and other main religions. He demands people to give up their pride and earthly pleasure and surrender their lives to avoide possible torture.

I don't hate that which does not exist.

I DO think that adults who believe in fairy tales are fucking assholes, though.