(October 9, 2016 at 11:59 am)Iroscato Wrote:

(October 9, 2016 at 7:18 am)theBorg Wrote: Thank you, you're absolutely right, what I am free to explain the thread. But I must extra carefully choose the words, so, this makes me tired. However, if you write me in private, I'd take you to the public places with less caring authorities.

There's nothing wrong with discussing and debating your beliefs, as long as you don't whip out a soapbox and start ejaculating copypasta all over the show.
Are you so afraid of thinking for yourself?

It's the Borg...?

(October 9, 2016 at 5:19 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:

(October 9, 2016 at 11:59 am)Iroscato Wrote: There's nothing wrong with discussing and debating your beliefs, as long as you don't whip out a soapbox and start ejaculating copypasta all over the show.
Are you so afraid of thinking for yourself?

It's the Borg...?

He doesn't have to fucking own it though! At least do it ironically or some shit. Isn't that what the young people are into these days? Irony?

(October 9, 2016 at 5:11 pm)theBorg Wrote:

(October 9, 2016 at 11:46 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Gee, I wonder why Bore is so terrified to discuss his ideas in the open?

Must not be much to 'em.

Yeah, one could discuss the thread, if it makes us happy. But it is off-topic do discuss my origin, that is being done in private. I am sorry and thanks.

I was talking about discussing your ideas. I don't care where you're from.

I don't recall the Borg of the past assaulting people's senses with obnoxious, unreadable nonsense. Maybe they assimilated a race of pretentious assholes.

(October 9, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(October 9, 2016 at 5:11 pm)theBorg Wrote: Yeah, one could discuss the thread, if it makes us happy. But it is off-topic do discuss my origin, that is being done in private. I am sorry and thanks.

I was talking about discussing your ideas. I don't care where you're from.

Thank, you, dear member of AF. Thank you for not using the insults or for not attacking me with the fu**-word, as they used to do in the Thinking Atheist Forum. I made the fatal mistake of revealing the whole my mind there. However, I was not banned, but got a lots of f-words.

The thread in AF begins with the strange title "Are the holy angels like the time-cops?" Let us study this "strangeness" first. The motive was to attract the public attention, so even the moderators do became interested, as it appears from the recent comments here.

Please, let us leave aside the question of the experimental detection of an angel. Then my own definition of the angel is "the living being, who is not an animal, not an insect, not a bird, etc thing from the school biology and virus-ology, and not a human."

Do you "copy" all this "nonsense"?

(October 10, 2016 at 12:01 am)theBorg Wrote:

(October 9, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I was talking about discussing your ideas. I don't care where you're from.

Thank, you, dear member of AF. Thank you for not using the insults or for not attacking me with the fu**-word, as they used to do in the Thinking Atheist Forum. I made the fatal mistake of revealing the whole my mind their. However, I was not banned, but got a lots of f-words.

The thread in AF begins with the strange title "Are the holy angels like the time-cops?" Let us study this "strangeness" first. The motive was to attract the public attention, so even the moderators do became interested, as it appears from the recent comments here.

Please, let us leave aside the question of the experimental detection of an angel. Then my own definition of the angel is "the living being, who is not an animal, not an insect, not a bird, etc thing from the school biology and virus-ology, and not a human."

Do you "copy" all this "nonsense"?

No. You've not defined what an angel even is. You've only said a few things that it isn't.

And yes, you will need to produce evidence of their existence, too, if you wish to change my mind. You aren't exempt from the demands of rationality.

Well...angels are Timecops.

(October 10, 2016 at 12:11 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(October 10, 2016 at 12:01 am)theBorg Wrote: Thank, you, dear member of AF. Thank you for not using the insults or for not attacking me with the fu**-word, as they used to do in the Thinking Atheist Forum. I made the fatal mistake of revealing the whole my mind their. However, I was not banned, but got a lots of f-words.

The thread in AF begins with the strange title "Are the holy angels like the time-cops?" Let us study this "strangeness" first. The motive was to attract the public attention, so even the moderators do became interested, as it appears from the recent comments here.

Please, let us leave aside the question of the experimental detection of an angel. Then my own definition of the angel is "the living being, who is not an animal, not an insect, not a bird, etc thing from the school biology and virus-ology, and not a human."

Do you "copy" all this "nonsense"?

No. You've not defined what an angel even is. You've only said a few.things that it isn't.

And yes, you will need to produce evidence of their existence, too, if you wish to change my mind. You aren't exempt from the demands of rationality.

I see, we have stumbled right at the title. So, it is not surprising, what the thread is looking like the gibberish nonsense.
What could I do then? To pray for the AF?

(October 10, 2016 at 12:17 am)Thena323 Wrote: Well...angels are Timecops.

Is that kinda like the library policeman?

(October 10, 2016 at 12:19 am)theBorg Wrote:

(October 10, 2016 at 12:11 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No. You've not defined what an angel even is. You've only said a few.things that it isn't.

And yes, you will need to produce evidence of their existence, too, if you wish to change my mind. You aren't exempt from the demands of rationality.

I see, we have stumbled right at the title. So, it is not surprising, what the thread is looking like the gibberish nonsense.
What could I do then? To pray for the AF?

Ain't my circus, ain't my monkeys, bud. You do whatever your little heart desires.