If you are concerned about the cops getting access:

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/ar...nt/480861/

And, Android phones are easier for the cops to crack:

http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/25/technolo...ncryption/

Tails is likely the most secure OS in the World (runs on Debian):

http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/29/566488...l-ever-own

And, you can download VeraCrypt for some extra security:

https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/

I am not saying that you need any of the above tools; only that they are available!

Hard to avoid if you need a passport.

If you want to evade being tracked better take the Kaczynski approach. Build yourself a cabin in the woods, no electricity, since they can track your possible habits by your consumtion, no electronic communications, no nothing.

(October 30, 2016 at 4:53 pm)abaris Wrote: Hard to avoid if you need a passport.

If you want to evade being tracked better take the Kaczynski approach. Build yourself a cabin in the woods, no electricity, since they can track your possible habits by your consumtion, no electronic communications, no nothing.

Yes, it's hard to avoid, but I was, principally, referring to smart phones.

If you power down the iPhone you can't open it up with a fingerprint. It requires a password.

So if the cops are coming just press the power button for a few seconds and swipe it off.

(October 30, 2016 at 4:58 pm)KUSA Wrote: If you power down the iPhone you can't open it up with a fingerprint. It requires a password.

So if the cops are coming just press the power button for a few seconds and swipe it off.

Very true!  However, a lot of people, me included, keep our cell phones (I don't own a smart phone, just a flip one) on all the time.

(October 30, 2016 at 5:10 pm)Jehanne Wrote:

(October 30, 2016 at 4:58 pm)KUSA Wrote: If you power down the iPhone you can't open it up with a fingerprint. It requires a password.

So if the cops are coming just press the power button for a few seconds and swipe it off.

Very true!  However, a lot of people, me included, keep our cell phones (I don't own a smart phone, just a flip one) on all the time.

You do realize that if you're someone worth tracking, that alone is a bad practice unless you're using burner phones.

I'm far too boring to need that kind of paranoia personally.

Your fingerprint should not be used as a primary method of authentication IMO. It's got the same level of security as writing your password on a post-it note and sticking it on your office wall. That is to say, it's easily accessible if you know where to look.

Passwords are stored in your head and are much harder to figure out.

(October 30, 2016 at 5:24 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Your fingerprint should not be used as a primary method of authentication IMO. It's got the same level of security as writing your password on a post-it note and sticking it on your office wall. That is to say, it's easily accessible if you know where to look.

Passwords are stored in your head and are much harder to figure out.

^^

I second this.

You can totally use your fingerprint as a secondary form of authentication though. For instance several apps on my phone have fingerprint locks on them and that's fine, because in order to access those apps you need my password to unlock my phone. My password isn't a 4 digit value either, it's complex.

(October 30, 2016 at 5:24 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Your fingerprint should not be used as a primary method of authentication IMO. It's got the same level of security as writing your password on a post-it note and sticking it on your office wall. That is to say, it's easily accessible if you know where to look.

Passwords are stored in your head and are much harder to figure out.

Point taken.... but: