Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2024, 8:28 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm)Mathilda Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 6:32 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Big fish/little pond synd?

Not even a big fish. His fragile ego means that he needs to believe that he's good at the subject but he doesn't actually understand much about it. I saw a lot of this on my Comp Sci degree as an undergrad. Young men would be boasting about how they got drunk and then went back and programmed something in C++.

No. I didn't understand it either.

I saw it a lot when I lived in the caribbean. It's got this unfounded macho twist.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 10:23 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Just got done reading the first couple pages of this thread and...what the fuck did I just read?

Hehe
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm)Mathilda Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 6:32 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Big fish/little pond synd?

Not even a big fish. His fragile ego means that he needs to believe that he's good at the subject but he doesn't actually understand much about it. I saw a lot of this on my Comp Sci degree as an undergrad. Young men would be boasting about how they got drunk and then went back and programmed something in C++.

No. I didn't understand it either.


EGOISM is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quatum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 6:52 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Not even a big fish. His fragile ego means that he needs to believe that he's good at the subject but he doesn't actually understand much about it. I saw a lot of this on my Comp Sci degree as an undergrad. Young men would be boasting about how they got drunk and then went back and programmed something in C++.

No. I didn't understand it either.

I saw it a lot when I lived in the caribbean. It's got this unfounded macho twist.

Yeah! It's somehow definitely tied in with this sense of machismo. Like doing battle via geekery.

It kind of reminds me of this:



Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 7:04 pm)Mathilda Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 6:52 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I saw it a lot when I lived in the caribbean. It's got this unfounded macho twist.

Yeah! It's somehow definitely tied in with this sense of machismo. Like doing battle via geekery.

It kind of reminds me of this:




EGOISM is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quatum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.

Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Yeah, not an insecurity driven response at all. 

I should probably indicate that this is sarcasm. You may not understand.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Hehehe have you noticed how more of the text is reaching maximum size Smile
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 7, 2016 at 7:10 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Hehehe have you noticed how more of the text is reaching maximum size 
Albeit:

EGOISM is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).

LEMMA OF MINE:

(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}

(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quatum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.




Query:
Mathilda, perhaps it is exigent that you express your most profound lemma.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
An erratum of mine:

INITIAL STATEMENT:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]

ERRATUM:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particularly abound Trigonometric Integration]

(November 7, 2016 at 6:48 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:
(November 7, 2016 at 6:37 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: THEIST likely accurately describes your religious stance, on observation of your irrelevant, nonsensical anecdotes...

Oh, ouch. And actually, based on what I and others can see in your behavior, (user name, flamboyance, attention seeking, dismissing what you can't defend) you appear to be the prototypical ego maniac with an inferiority complex. 

I could have been wrong. More like little fish/little pond synd.

Invalid.

I had, four years prior, naively (albeit logically) axiomatized consciousness, amidst an equation. See "Consciencia_Aequatio".

Therein, for any computational system observed, there exists some non-polynomially computable function [on planck-einsteinian relation].

Thereafter, existence is uniformly distributed at the boundary of said asymptote; therein, asymptotical indifference (amidst existence's constituents) persists.

As such, inferiority is but inconsequential/asymptotically inexistent.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Sorry, didn't read a word. And won't while you keep up the text manipulation attention seeking behavior.

Have you reached critical mass?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 9903 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 2136 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 2629 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 6681 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Muslim students less likely to be awarded top class degrees. Succubus#2 28 3126 March 22, 2020 at 6:02 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Religious fundamentalists more likely to believe fake news OakTree500 30 4786 November 10, 2018 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: no one
  If theists understood "evidence" Silver 135 16891 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 3382 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Are introverts less likely to like organised religion? Der/die AtheistIn 8 1580 March 22, 2018 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: GODZILLA
  Can religion be a type of Stockholm syndrome? ignoramus 5 2978 June 10, 2017 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 56 Guest(s)