Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 3, 2024, 10:16 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
#51
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 9:53 am)TaraJo Wrote: Since about 2012 or so, the SJW's have been on the rise; the jerks who use progressive sounding, virtuous buzzwords to justify being jerks. 

So you mean regressive leftists because  that's what they literally are.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#52
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
The "regressive left" aren't left... it's a form of authoritarianism that enjoy a liberal image without actually being liberal. Far from being about liberty they censor people under the guise of "THAT HURTS MY FEEWINGZ!"
Reply
#53
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
The other thing is SJW's aren't bad per say but with feminists too they could be attacking real stuff like the middle east and how woman are treated in that culture.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#54
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 8:25 pm)alpha male Wrote: If he's a bigoted moron, he's a bigoted moron WINNER...and will be again in 4 years the way you guys are going.

I hate to agree with shitheads but you are right.  I never underestimate the intelligence of the 'murrican voter.
Reply
#55
Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 1:59 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If they did they fucked themselves but good.

They? I hate to tell you this but you are part of them.
Reply
#56
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 8:58 pm)dyresand Wrote: The other thing is SJW's aren't  bad per say but with feminists too they could be attacking real stuff like the middle east and how woman are treated in that culture.

I always find this complaint ridiculous. "Women in the middle east are treated worse!  So you should stop trying to do anything about the issues that you personally face, and instead focus on something you probably can't do anything about!"
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Reply
#57
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
Y'know, the most frustrating thing about the SJW's or the regressive left or whatever you want to call those complete assholes.... I agree with so many of their causes. But, at the same time, I can completely understand why people loath them.

For example, I support gender equality and I think there are some serious issues with a huge gender imbalance in positions of political or financial power. But when I hear feminists taking pride in being a misandrist or bragging about causing male tears, even I want to tell them to shut up, get in the kitchen and make me a goddamn sandwich. I support black people and I think there's something SERIOUSLY wrong with so many of them being killed, needlessly, by police. But when I hear that my opinions don't matter because I'm white, I want to go put a confederate flag on the back of a pick up truck. Nobody is going to consider transgender issues as personal an issue as me, but when some 15 year old bitches me out because he made up a new gender identity last week and everybody doesn't automatically pick it up, well, then even I want to call them a degenerate faggot. They generally have good issues, but they're such jerks when they talk about them. That's what's killing them.

And I can't help but wonder, how many people were sitting on the fence about those issues and the assholes pushed them solidly into Trump territory? I mean, you can't shame people into agreeing with you. Seriously, has anyone here decided to stop being an atheist because the world told us not to? And how well does it work out when someone decides not to be gay because it's shameful? Trying to shame them will just turn them against you.

But being able to have conversations is the important thing and a lot of lefties don't seem to be able to do it. I mean, the right are jerks about their conversations, but at least they're willing to talk. The left just gives condescending lectures.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto

"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Reply
#58
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
A lot of people here seem to think that SJW's are the only people that can't be talked to.
I'd argue that there are veins of conservatism that are similarly difficult to talk to. The moment you mention that you might want to see taxes increased, or suggest that Obama was even a halfway decent president, you become a "libtard" and the discussion ends.

I'm generalizing my own experiences here(so take this with a grain of salt), but it seems like the "alt-right"(maybe not the best term) and I guess I will call it the "regressive left" are just those that yell the loudest. It seems to me that this kind of stuff creates a positive feedback loop. It's similar to how it can be hard on some forums to maintain a neutral stance in a polarized discussion. Eventually one side bothers you enough, and another side is at least marginally similar enough to your stance that there is a temptation to distance yourself from one position and step closer to another. Especially if the side that you don't fully agree with is gas lighting you at every turn.
Reply
#59
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
I think like anything else it's a partly responsible thing. There could be literally an endless list of different reasons why people voted Trump; SJW culture, Terror attracks, economic downturn, Hillary being an awful candidate as well. I think people went into this vote really wanting change so bad, and Trump was the one shouting the loudest that he promised to bring some kind of change (however much of a bigot he made himself sound doing it).

But yes, I've called out this petty SJW culture in several posts on this forum over the last week or so. There is an internet culture of name-calling against anyone who doesn't agree 100% with a particular groups' identity politics. And don't get me wrong, some people truly are bigots, but sometimes this charge of bigotry is used against even generally progressive-minded people who simply have nuanced middle-ground realistic opinion.

If you are in a relatively "privileged" position, you simply can't enter into these discussions on social issues from any angle without making some social blunder that gets you branded a "privileged asshole"... and if you choose not to engage at all for this very reason? Guess what, that's offensive too, because you're choosing to stay silent.

I think that environment just frustrates the unfairly vilified, and drives them to a point of thinking "oh well I can't win whatever I do, so fuck you".

What's gone missing is a real genuine discussion culture. We can't rationally talk about anything like adults anymore. So many people are just so damn sensitive to opinions they don't agree with that they have to shut people down with accusations of bigotry, rather than hear what they have to say.

You can take any "social issue" conversation right now, whether it's racism, sexism, "Islamophobia" (I hate that term, I prefer "anti-Muslim sentiment"), homophobia etc, you see the same thing. You are caught between people who claim that these forms of bigotry flat don't exist on one side, and people on the other side who think one or more of those forms of bigotry are to blame for absolutely everything. Both sides completely lack nuance or an ability to hold a meaningful productive conversation, I think it is becoming truly progressive to be opposed to both.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane"  - sarcasm_only

"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable."
- Maryam Namazie

Reply
#60
RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
(November 15, 2016 at 8:58 pm)dyresand Wrote: The other thing is SJW's aren't  bad per say but with feminists too they could be attacking real stuff like the middle east and how woman are treated in that culture.

SJWs are bad.

They are fucking cancer.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  2024 US Presidential Election Thumpalumpacus 1142 63323 June 1, 2024 at 11:07 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Social democracy in Europe without 5 minutes Interaktive 1 606 January 3, 2023 at 4:55 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Bacha Bazi: how poor Afghani boys were raped. WinterHold 76 6271 December 29, 2022 at 2:25 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Does Social Issues matter when deciding your political affiliation? T.J. 48 3263 April 21, 2022 at 9:36 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  TX social media censorship bill Fake Messiah 24 2311 September 14, 2021 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  Amy Coney Barnett officially confirmed as Supreme Court Justice Rev. Rye 33 2238 October 28, 2020 at 3:01 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Mail in voting/ and election day. Brian37 6 853 October 25, 2020 at 2:47 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  BREAKING:Trump refuses to commit to a peaceful transition of power after Election Day WinterHold 97 5589 October 2, 2020 at 1:50 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  Justice Obama? BrianSoddingBoru4 33 1693 August 26, 2020 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Social Security and wealth. Brian37 20 1169 July 9, 2020 at 12:18 pm
Last Post: Brian37



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)