RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:08 am
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2024, 8:29 pm
Thread Rating:
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
|
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:09 am
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:09 am
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:11 am
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:13 am
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2016 at 10:14 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:15 am
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:16 am
(November 20, 2016 at 10:09 am)Excited Penguin Wrote:(November 20, 2016 at 10:05 am)LastPoet Wrote: Since when Sam Harris is a neuroscientist? All I can find on wikipedia is that he did a PhD in Neuroscience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Harris#Neuroscience Has he actually ever had a post-doctoral job in Neuroscience? Is he continuing to do research in Neuroscience? I am genuinely interested in finding out. RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:19 am
(November 20, 2016 at 10:13 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:(November 20, 2016 at 10:11 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: Can you drop the act ? I already have. Is it logical to act like a retard? Nobody is wiling to have discussions with you like this. No one will understand or concede your points. This is not your own private circle jerk where the more you wish it the more will people get "on your level". No, rather, you have to act and sound like a human being. This is a discussion forum, for. If you're not willing to work towards a more successful type of conversation then you are wasting your time. How is that logical ? Come on. Snap out of it. Make two coherent normal sentences. Make two more. You can do it. RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:23 am
(November 20, 2016 at 10:19 am)Excited Penguin Wrote:(November 20, 2016 at 10:13 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: I shall remain logical, as long as my body permits such. I have now detected my ERRORS; for unless one partakes in some profound science (neuroscience, quantum physics etc) it is highly unlikely that one shall recognize the aforesaid likelihoods/viable scientific observed/observable phenomena. RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 20, 2016 at 10:29 am
You are so delusional. If you want to remain free you should probably fly under the radar of your society authorities.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 62 Guest(s)