I am so confused about the Nap/LP feud going on right now lol.

(January 5, 2017 at 2:29 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: Okay then, I look forward to eventually seeing the outcome of the report.

Unless we decide on a ban, there'll be nothing for anyone other than the member in question to see. Apart from the standard acknowledgement message, anyway.

(January 5, 2017 at 1:27 pm)Shell B Wrote: There's a common misconception that moderators and admins have to behave a certain way. They're not expected to. Napo knows that. If LP were acting as a moderator, he would behave as a moderator should. The rest of the time, he's just a member saying what he wants, which is his right.

---

(January 5, 2017 at 1:17 pm)A Theist Wrote: Give it time. Give it time. Sooner or later....

Seriously, why do you guys think someone will defend the attackers? Is it because they're black or anti-Trump?

No. Not because they were black or anti Trump. For my part, I was referencing the SJWs  who see racist attacks like this as something only white people do. Most SJWs won't see this as racially motivated when in fact it was. Even the Chicago police chief downplayed the attack as just a stupid decision by young adults and may not rise to the level of a hate crime. CNN commentator blames bad parenting...refuses to call it a hate crime. If it were the other way around where whites were the attackers every SJW activist on this site would be screaming racism. We're just calling out the unbalanced bias by the SJWs.





MTV basically says that black people can't be racist....





This was a racially motivated hate crime, and just so happened, 4 blacks were the attackers who kidnapped and tortured a mentally challenged white guy.

(January 5, 2017 at 2:33 pm)LastPoet Wrote: Then your purpose was to call me out? You have something to say, say it, don't cower under another subject.

Let me put it like this.

You called me out in another thread for posting an article that I'd found on reddit. I found that rather bizarre as I don't really see what difference it makes but you seemed to be quite intent on calling me an imbecile for it (unbecoming for a moderator )

I found the story in the OP from a reddit thread, and naturally when writing up the post I knew you would rave like some stupid chimpanzee who think's he's just solved a rubix cube.

So I got in first.

10/10 would do it again. 4D Tetris champion right here.


On the topic of reddit, I'm not quite sure what your beef is there, but hey, you kicked off that subject in a rather confrontational manner in the first instance so I couldn't give a flying fuck what the beef actually is.


And now I'm just responding to your bait posts for the fun of it until I get bored or get warned from a moderator for 'trolling', as though you aren't the most obnoxious baiter on this forum.

---

(January 5, 2017 at 2:39 pm)A Theist Wrote: MTV basically says that black people can't be racist....

Quote:

Fuck me I'm glad you posted this video.

C'mon white people, we can do so much better.

Here's the original:

(January 5, 2017 at 2:36 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I am so confused about the Nap/LP feud going on right now lol.

Look at the OP and look at the subject of the thread. Why is my name in there?

The simple fact is that some people think a moderator has to be all polished to participate. I got called out, I responded in kind. I have the previlege as any other members.

Quote:Honest answer: because the media already downplays race crime against whites and indeed any crimes caused by ethnic minorities. However the reverse happens and it's immediately without question called what it is (which is as it should be btw).

There's a double standard that goes on with the media when a lot of these types of stories are reported, at least from what I see.

If it's a white kid shooting up a school they'll immediately tell you that it is such. If it's a jihadi shooting people in the streets they wait as long as possible before even mentioning the word terrorism.

Use the title of the article in the OP as a prime example. Nowhere is race mentioned in it. However if it were the other way around, you can bet your ass they'd make a point of saying it's race related. 100%.

Sorry. This doesn't really answer my question. The media downplaying this (if they do) doesn't really explain why Bella and that weird guy think people on this forum will actually defend people who beat and ridiculed a man, let alone a mentally handicapped man.

---

(January 5, 2017 at 2:39 pm)A Theist Wrote:

(January 5, 2017 at 1:27 pm)Shell B Wrote: There's a common misconception that moderators and admins have to behave a certain way. They're not expected to. Napo knows that. If LP were acting as a moderator, he would behave as a moderator should. The rest of the time, he's just a member saying what he wants, which is his right.

---

Seriously, why do you guys think someone will defend the attackers? Is it because they're black or anti-Trump?

No. Not because they were black or anti Trump. For my part, I was referencing the SJWs  who see racist attacks like this as something only white people do. Most SJWs won't see this as racially motivated when in fact it was. Even the Chicago police chief downplayed the attack as just a stupid decision by young adults and may not rise to the level of a hate crime. CNN commentator blames bad parenting...refuses to call it a hate crime. If it were the other way around where whites were the attackers every SJW activist on this site would be screaming racism. We're just calling out the unbalanced bias by the SJWs.





MTV basically says that black people can't be racist....





This was a racially motivated hate crime, and just so happened, 4 blacks were the attackers who kidnapped and tortured a mentally challenged white guy.

So because some people downplay the race aspect, you think people will defend the "suspects?" You guys keep playing the race card as the reason you think people will defend the attackers. Misconstruing a criminal's motive does not mean you defend said criminal.

For what it's worth, it's obviously a hate crime.

(January 5, 2017 at 2:40 pm)Napoléon Wrote:

(January 5, 2017 at 2:33 pm)LastPoet Wrote: Then your purpose was to call me out? You have something to say, say it, don't cower under another subject.

Let me put it like this.

You called me out in another thread for posting an article that I'd found on reddit. I found that rather bizarre as I don't really see what difference it makes but you seemed to be quite intent on calling me an imbecile for it (unbecoming for a moderator )

I found the story in the OP from a reddit thread, and naturally when writing up the post I knew you would rave like some stupid chimpanzee who think's he's just solved a rubix cube.

So I got in first.

10/10 would do it again. 4D Tetris champion right here.


On the topic of reddit, I'm not quite sure what your beef is there, but hey, you kicked off that subject in a rather confrontational manner in the first instance so I couldn't give a flying fuck what the beef actually is.


And now I'm just responding to your bait posts for the fun of it until I get bored or get warned from a moderator for 'trolling', as though you aren't the most obnoxious baiter on this forum.

I replied to your OP on the other thread, there is a vast difference. Do you even have a mind of your own? It's not about reddit, I go there too, I replied on the other thread that you can't even add your own words, just Ctrl+c, Ctrl+v and that makes you an imbecile.

Worse than that is that once you get your ass handed to you, for calling me out on purpose on the OP (not by moderator action lolz ), you whine and bitch about my actions?

Don't I have the right to say what's in my mind? Report, if any break of the rules happened. Otherwise keep telling how good you are at 4d tetris. Some of us have better things to do.

That actually got reported?

4d Tetris? Kid's stuff. 15d, now that's a man's game.

(January 5, 2017 at 2:44 pm)Shell B Wrote:

Quote:Honest answer: because the media already downplays race crime against whites and indeed any crimes caused by ethnic minorities. However the reverse happens and it's immediately without question called what it is (which is as it should be btw).

There's a double standard that goes on with the media when a lot of these types of stories are reported, at least from what I see.

If it's a white kid shooting up a school they'll immediately tell you that it is such. If it's a jihadi shooting people in the streets they wait as long as possible before even mentioning the word terrorism.

Use the title of the article in the OP as a prime example. Nowhere is race mentioned in it. However if it were the other way around, you can bet your ass they'd make a point of saying it's race related. 100%.

Sorry. This doesn't really answer my question. The media downplaying this (if they do) doesn't really explain why Bella and that weird guy think people on this forum will actually defend people who beat and ridiculed a man, let alone a mentally handicapped man.

---

(January 5, 2017 at 2:39 pm)A Theist Wrote: No. Not because they were black or anti Trump. For my part, I was referencing the SJWs  who see racist attacks like this as something only white people do. Most SJWs won't see this as racially motivated when in fact it was. Even the Chicago police chief downplayed the attack as just a stupid decision by young adults and may not rise to the level of a hate crime. CNN commentator blames bad parenting...refuses to call it a hate crime. If it were the other way around where whites were the attackers every SJW activist on this site would be screaming racism. We're just calling out the unbalanced bias by the SJWs.





MTV basically says that black people can't be racist....





This was a racially motivated hate crime, and just so happened, 4 blacks were the attackers who kidnapped and tortured a mentally challenged white guy.

So because some people downplay the race aspect, you think people will defend the "suspects?" You guys keep playing the race card as the reason you think people will defend the attackers. Misconstruing a criminal's motive does not mean you defend said criminal.

For what it's worth, it's obviously a hate crime.

Defending, downplaying the racial motivation of the attackers, it's all the same to me. At least, that's the way I see it.

I definitely agree with you. Obviously a hate crime.