(September 25, 2017 at 4:16 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(September 25, 2017 at 11:53 am)Whateverist Wrote: Yes, it does.  It's consistence with my supporting the decisions of actual beings over those of people's imaginary friends.

Let me ask you something, suppose if a person owned some puppies, and decided to kill them, would you be in support of that?

If they had a prized, purebred show dog, or breeding dog, and found out some mutt had gotten in and banged her up, and they decided to abort those fetuses, I'd be cool with that.

(September 25, 2017 at 4:58 pm)JackRussell Wrote: Yep,

I know you don't understand.

Sorry for you mate.

It's a very simple question, the fact that you're avoiding it speaks volumes.

(September 25, 2017 at 5:20 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's a very simple question, the fact that you're avoiding it speaks volumes.

You didn't answer my question in relation to the doggy scenario.

(September 25, 2017 at 5:03 pm)Chad32 Wrote:

(September 25, 2017 at 4:16 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Let me ask you something, suppose if a person owned some puppies, and decided to kill them, would you be in support of that?

If they had a prized, purebred show dog, or breeding dog, and found out some mutt had gotten in and banged her up, and they decided to abort those fetuses, I'd be cool with that.

But, fetuses aren't puppies right?

Besides, that's a convoluted answer, it's almost lowkey racist...

---

(September 25, 2017 at 5:21 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:

(September 25, 2017 at 5:20 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's a very simple question, the fact that you're avoiding it speaks volumes.

You didn't answer my question in relation to the doggy scenario.

Outside.

(September 25, 2017 at 5:23 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Outside.

The answer to that would be no.

I find it interesting that you stepped outside of the argument of abortion of a human fetus that still resides inside of it's mother's womb to puppies outside of the mother dog's womb.

Why did you illogically disrupt the flow of the argument in that way?

(September 25, 2017 at 5:27 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:

(September 25, 2017 at 5:23 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Outside.

The answer to that would be no.

I find it interesting that you stepped outside of the argument of abortion of a human fetus that still resides inside of it's mother's womb to puppies outside of the mother dog's womb.

Why did you illogically disrupt the flow of the argument in that way?

Because pets are property and it's legal... a persons should have the right to decide what to do with their property correct?

(September 25, 2017 at 5:30 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Because pets are property and it's legal... a persons should have the right to decide what to do with their property correct?

By all means, become capable of carrying a fetus in your stomach and then come to me with legality issues.

Simply resorting to illogical puppy arguments is not doing your intellect any justice.

(September 25, 2017 at 5:20 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(September 25, 2017 at 4:58 pm)JackRussell Wrote: Yep,

I know you don't understand.

Sorry for you mate.

It's a very simple question, the fact that you're avoiding it speaks volumes.

What did `I not answer?

Abortion is regrettable, but understandable.

Women do not have access to contraception, education and healthcare around the world.

The world is overpopulated because of that.

Any woman that wants to carry a baby to term should have support.

Morality is much more difficult than most people ever consider.

Religion gives morality by rote, I prefer morality by thought,

And it's fucking difficult.

But at least I care to try to think about it, dumb fuck that I am.

I have killed people, and that will live with me forever,

Do not condescend that I do not think about this stuff.

Bible book has never helped and is full of demonstrably untrue shit..

Flood believers are so paradigmatically unrealistic to not be even be on my radar.

Reality matters to me.

(September 25, 2017 at 4:16 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(September 25, 2017 at 11:53 am)Whateverist Wrote: Yes, it does.  It's consistence with my supporting the decisions of actual beings over those of people's imaginary friends.

Let me ask you something, suppose if a person owned some puppies, and decided to kill them, would you be in support of that?

I would be disappointed to hear it.  But, for sure, we have way too many puppies and kitties born every year in this country - more than it is possible to properly match to homes.  I wouldn't find it anything to celebrate but neither would I be against it.  It would just be sad.

(September 25, 2017 at 5:40 pm)Whateverist Wrote:

(September 25, 2017 at 4:16 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Let me ask you something, suppose if a person owned some puppies, and decided to kill them, would you be in support of that?

I would be disappointed to hear it.  But, for sure, we have way too many puppies and kitties born every year in this country - more than it is possible to properly match to homes.  I wouldn't find it anything to celebrate but neither would I be against it.  It would just be sad.

Are you a politician?