Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 17, 2025, 3:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
Joining late.
The statistics don't lie in this instance - they just don't. Thousands upon thousands of cases of polio (and other diseases) reduced through vaccinations to very few. How can that be argued against? There may be the odd case where there MAY be side affects, but, sad though that is, it is statistically negligible. I think it should be law to vaccinate your child.
My dad was involved in a car accident when I was little. He wasn't wearing a seat belt and as the car flipped he was thrown into the passenger seat whereupon the roof on the driver's side caved in. He survived - yet had he been wearing a seat belt he would have died. True story. But, that doesn't suddenly mean that I (or he) suddenly think that no one should wear seat belts and that they are potentially dangerous contraptions. It is rightly against the law not to wear seat belts in many countries. For me - this analogy works and the stats are probably similar.
Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
The most disgusting part of his flim flam is the scare tactics . Of telling you what ails you must be MTHFR genes . It's essentially like medieval doctors saying your blood is unclean . Only instead of bleeding you to cure it. They tell you their magic supplements will save you .   

[Image: 5-Signs-You-Are-Dealing-With-A-Snake-Oil...9_fill.jpg]
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
(December 20, 2017 at 8:56 am)Tizheruk Wrote: Fact of the matter is people who don't vaccinated their children should be charged with public endangerment or child abuse.

Why not both?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
CL. you want my children dead. That is your wish and your hope.

You are lost, utterly lost.
Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
Lol yep, you got it
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
I really wish some of you would read CL's first post or two where she said she would definitely vaccinate her kids. What CL is doing is trying to explain that she sees BOTH sides of the discussion. And since there really isn't anyone else here to argue for these anti-vaxxers, she's doing it in order to bring a well rounded discussion to the table. If everyone takes the same side of an issue, it no longer remains an issue.

She is playing devil's advocate on this topic and the insults and accusations being tossed in her direction is just pathetic. She doesn't wish for anyone's kid to die and you people fucking know that. Some of our more seasoned members here know what she went through last year and to accuse her of wanting to cause harm to other kids - well shame on you.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
(December 20, 2017 at 6:07 pm)Patrick33 Wrote: Joining late.
The statistics don't lie in this instance - they just don't. Thousands upon thousands of cases of polio (and other diseases) reduced through vaccinations to very few. How can that be argued against? There may be the odd case where there MAY be side affects, but, sad though that is, it is statistically negligible. I think it should be law to vaccinate your child.
My dad was involved in a car accident when I was little. He wasn't wearing a seat belt and as the car flipped he was thrown into the passenger seat whereupon the roof on the driver's side caved in. He survived - yet had he been wearing a seat belt he would have died. True story. But, that doesn't suddenly mean that I (or he) suddenly think that no one should wear seat belts and that they are potentially dangerous contraptions. It is rightly against the law not to wear seat belts in many countries. For me - this analogy works and the stats are probably similar.

This is 100% what it is.  People who don't get the importance of numbers will multiply an individual anecdote like "He was thrown clear and it saved his life," so there will be like 1 million videos of this on Youtube.  People who DO get it will make a little statistical explanation that will get 100 views, or maybe 100k if it's V-sauce or something.

It then appears that the issue is more balanced than it really is: "Half the people I know think vax autism is likely true, and half don't.  Must be a matter of opinion, or an unresolved issue." They are completely incapable of finding the information that matters, and they won't listen to anyone who can guide them to it.
Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
(December 21, 2017 at 10:44 am)Joods Wrote: I really wish some of you would read CL's first post or two where she said she would definitely vaccinate her kids.

I'm not so sure that she's telling the truth when she says that. Her posts read as the anti vaxxer version of the "I'm not a racist, but..." racist line, which is not surprising that she's pretty much an Ionanist/Opus Dei type catholic.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
(December 21, 2017 at 10:44 am)Joods Wrote: I really wish some of you would read CL's first post or two where she said she would definitely vaccinate her kids. What CL is doing is trying to explain that she sees BOTH sides of the discussion. And since there really isn't anyone else here to argue for these anti-vaxxers,  she's doing it in order to bring a well rounded discussion to the table. If everyone takes the same side of an issue,  it no longer remains an issue.

She is playing devil's advocate on this topic and the insults and accusations being tossed in her direction is just pathetic. She doesn't wish for anyone's kid to die and you people fucking know that.   Some of our more seasoned members here know what she went through last year and to accuse her of wanting to cause harm to other kids - well shame on you.
1. Their is no other side . It's just anti social anti science nonsense 

2. And as much as i like CL . I can't abide such a defense of the indefensible  . Thou i definitely don't think she wants to hurt children .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
(December 22, 2017 at 7:31 pm)Wololo Wrote:
(December 21, 2017 at 10:44 am)Joods Wrote: I really wish some of you would read CL's first post or two where she said she would definitely vaccinate her kids.

I'm not so sure that she's telling the truth when she says that. Her posts read as the anti vaxxer version of the "I'm not a racist, but..." racist line, which is not surprising that she's pretty much an Ionanist/Opus Dei type catholic.

LOL
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Top 5 Personal Worst Pathogen Sick Nanny 27 3592 September 30, 2023 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Silver
  A Potential, Possible, Maybe Medical Game-Changer BrianSoddingBoru4 0 404 March 21, 2022 at 4:36 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Vaccines: Low trust in vaccination 'a global crisis' zebo-the-fat 20 3164 September 6, 2019 at 8:28 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  Inspiring Medical Breakthroughs of 2017 shadow 13 3400 December 25, 2017 at 10:32 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Personal Developement notimportant1234 39 3967 December 16, 2017 at 7:17 am
Last Post: notimportant1234
  Medical information needed. Gawdzilla Sama 22 5544 September 25, 2017 at 8:27 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  A couple of Medical snippets brewer 0 684 June 5, 2017 at 5:55 am
Last Post: brewer
  Is protesting getting you down? brewer 4 1359 March 27, 2017 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Corporal punishment down brewer 2 995 December 13, 2016 at 1:30 pm
Last Post: paulpablo
  Medical/Sugar/Comparison to Big Tobacco brewer 7 2599 December 2, 2016 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Noprophets



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)