Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2024, 7:33 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
#41
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I don't know where you got that the Ark housed "every “kind” that existed" from, I've already explained my position on that in other threads.
How fucking convenient, lol.  Rolleyes And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?

How long are you saying it should take for a cat to produce a different breed?
Reply
#42
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote: How fucking convenient, lol.  Rolleyes And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?

How long are you saying it should take for a new breed of cat to appear?

The question at hand is not how long it takes for a new breed to appear but how long it took for all cats to evolve from this recent ark ancestor you’ve proposed.
I believe in life before death.
Reply
#43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
[Image: ?url=2.bp.blogspot.com%2F--cfCP63LoqU%2F...BChain.jpg]

That is the dumbest thing i have ever seen 

[Image: tmp11434_thumb1_thumb1.jpg?imgmax=800]
Much better

[Image: 1253px-An_evolutionary_tree_of_mammals.jpeg]
Better still
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
#44
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Antares Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 10:03 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: It's worse than that since the flood allegedly happened around 4000 years ago. But, that's his claim alright. And he'll ignore shit like the fact that cat domestication began in Egypt well before his flood, and that they never had a world wide flood in Egypt.

Not only did that geriatric Boatwright build his first ship, he must have built the first boat. Ever?

Hey, it's Huggies we're talking about. He believes a biblical time line that means all of creation came into existence well after the Sumerians invented glue. Big Grin

(March 17, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote: How fucking convenient, lol.  Rolleyes And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?

How long are you saying it should take for a cat to produce a different breed?

Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#45
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
Quote:Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid.
The words kinda jumble  Tongue

I suggest huggy use the words as biologists define them . Not common dictionary uses.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
#46
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 10:18 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid.
No dummy, breeds exist WITHIN a species.

If two animals can produce fertile ofsping then they belong to the same species, if these two animals are distinctly different then they are different breeds of the same species... got it?
Reply
#47
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 10:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 10:18 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid.
No dummy, breeds exist WITHIN a species.

If two animals can produce fertile ofsping then they belong to the same species, if these two animals are distinctly different then they are different breeds of the same species... got it?

Not what your post implied, but whatever, asshole. You're still the one who believes all speciation in the world occurred in just 4,000 years and that's still a special kind of stupid.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#48
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
No that's still you talking shit huggy then trying to bury your shit .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
#49
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 10:48 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 10:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: No dummy, breeds exist WITHIN a species.

If two animals can produce fertile ofsping then they belong to the same species, if these two animals are distinctly different then they are different breeds of the same species... got it?

Not what your post implied, but whatever, asshole. You're still the one who believes all speciation in the world occurred in just 4,000 years and that's still a special kind of stupid.

Wasn't the OP talking about how a type salamander could produce a new species every few months?

So answer question, how long does it take for an animal to produce a new breed?
Reply
#50
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 10:55 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 10:48 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Not what your post implied, but whatever, asshole. You're still the one who believes all speciation in the world occurred in just 4,000 years and that's still a special kind of stupid.

Wasn't the OP talking about how a type salamander could produce a new species every few months?

So answer question, how long does it take for an animal to produce a new breed?

Deflection noted.

You really think there's a single answer to that for all animals?!? You've already been worked on speciation once. You really want to go there again?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This is Kind of Sad Minimalist 0 449 August 19, 2017 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Different kind of Traffic Stop Minimalist 3 1329 May 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
Tongue Stuff Creationist Say Cholley71 0 778 April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
Last Post: Cholley71
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 2814 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Funny pics of all kind Ace Otana 74 54849 September 16, 2010 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Eilonnwy
  Top 10 creationist arguments Dotard 4 1389 February 10, 2010 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Pippy



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)