Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 29, 2018 at 6:08 pm
You are incoherent, but I shall endeavour to lend a machete to your intellectual thicket.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: (May 29, 2018 at 1:04 pm)Abaddon_ir Wrote: Wrong. Absent any evidence, why, logically speaking, would you accept any damn fool idea? There is no evidence for unicorns, dragons or talking donkeys either. Is it reasonable to assume those exist too? Simply by having no evidence?
_________________________________________________________________________________________
| YB: 1. If As had logically supported reasonable reasons, then they would give them We did. Your obvious illiteracy prevented you from reading those responses.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: Abaddon_ire: We do, we gave them, you promptly ignored them.2. they admit they are opinions or have trouble seeing that they are
Define "E". Then explain which orifice you pulled the term "supreme logic" out of. Nobody used any such term until you invented it out of whole
cloth. Learn to use the quote function. You have mashed up my words in order to do....something. It is hard to discern what you intended because of the incoherent nonsense.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: YB: [/b]Re. "Absent any evidence" Before we get your logical reasonable proof that "there is no evidence for Unicorns" etc. Could you prove that you can logically discern any evidence given for G or (U,D or TD), with reasonable logical proof? LOLWUT?
![[Image: V097MA8.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/V097MA8.jpg)
You have evidence for unicorns? Feel free to share.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: (What ever type of E is given to you for whatever?) Incoherent sentence fragment.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: Re ire: We do, we gave them, you promptly ignored them.
YB: Can you prove how (explaining that an assertion isn't logical something considered logical proof) means what you gave was ignored?
Re ire: which ???? you pulled the term "supreme logic" out of. Nobody used any such... #314 Who do you think you are talking to?
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: Gotta go again. There is lots of sufficient/convincing evidence for G by the way. G? G-force? G-spot? G what?
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: But the A's Ive heard around here so far have been disappointing,
they won't or can't prove they have the ability to reason logically about evidence. Oh I can happily reason about evidence for anything. The problem is that you have none.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: Yet, they keep asking for E for G as if they have some standard or ability to reason logically about it.
Wow! If you can't prove you can reason logically about E.
Why would anyone go forward and even try to give E for G? Keep trying. Eventually you will have an EGG.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: Oh well, try to give it to Friday or Saturday and see if any logical reasoning is around. Don't bother. You clearly know nothing about logic or reason, hell even basic spelling is a mythological far distant country to you.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: I You what?
Posts: 28323
Threads: 523
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 29, 2018 at 8:16 pm
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote:
Gotta go again. There is lots of sufficient/convincing evidence for G by the way.
I've noticed that you have failed to respond to me. Can you supply a rational logical reason for doing so?
Maybe taking time out to worship a child killer?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 35280
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 29, 2018 at 8:20 pm
(May 29, 2018 at 8:16 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: (May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote:
Gotta go again. There is lots of sufficient/convincing evidence for G by the way.
I've noticed that you have failed to respond to me. Can you supply a rational logical reason for doing so?
Maybe taking time out to worship a child killer?
There's plenty of evidence for G, you heathen!
It follows "f" in the alphabet and just try saying "giraffes" or "girls" without it!
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 29, 2018 at 11:02 pm
(May 29, 2018 at 8:20 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: (May 29, 2018 at 8:16 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I've noticed that you have failed to respond to me. Can you supply a rational logical reason for doing so?
Maybe taking time out to worship a child killer?
There's plenty of evidence for G, you heathen!
It follows "f" in the alphabet and just try saying "giraffes" or "girls" without it!
O man that cracked me up so bad.
Posts: 104
Threads: 1
Joined: May 23, 2018
Reputation:
1
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 29, 2018 at 11:44 pm
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2018 at 11:47 pm by Ybe.)
[quote pid='1766095' dateline='1527631705']
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: Oh well, try to give it to Friday or Saturday and see if any logical reasoning is around. Don't bother. You clearly know nothing about logic or reason, hell even basic spelling is a mythological far distant country to you.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: I You what?
[/quote]
Looks like you need to review the first Post...
You what, what?
I am
(May 29, 2018 at 8:16 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: (May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote:
Gotta go again. There is lots of sufficient/convincing evidence for G by the way.
I've noticed that you have failed to respond to me. Can you supply a rational logical reason for doing so?
Maybe taking time out to worship a child killer?
Sorry, here is a response for you.
If no G, then no reason 4 responding.
Posts: 35280
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 29, 2018 at 11:50 pm
(May 29, 2018 at 11:44 pm)Ybe Wrote: [quote pid='1766095' dateline='1527631705']
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: Oh well, try to give it to Friday or Saturday and see if any logical reasoning is around. Don't bother. You clearly know nothing about logic or reason, hell even basic spelling is a mythological far distant country to you.
(May 29, 2018 at 4:19 pm)Ybe Wrote: I You what? Looks like you need to review the first Post...
You what, what?
I am
(May 29, 2018 at 8:16 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I've noticed that you have failed to respond to me. Can you supply a rational logical reason for doing so?
Maybe taking time out to worship a child killer?
Sorry, here is a response for you.
If no G, then no reason 4 responding.
[/quote]
And there are people who say this clown isn't trolling...
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 104
Threads: 1
Joined: May 23, 2018
Reputation:
1
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 29, 2018 at 11:58 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2018 at 12:40 am by Ybe.)
Sorry, here is a response for you.
If no G, then no reason 4 responding.
[/quote]
[/quote] And there are people who say this clown isn't trolling... [/quote]
That is a better response than yours, and exemplifies how As respond to me.
Posts: 28323
Threads: 523
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 30, 2018 at 7:28 am
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2018 at 7:32 am by brewer.)
(May 29, 2018 at 11:58 pm)Ybe Wrote: Sorry, here is a response for you.
If no G, then no reason 4 responding. And there are people who say this clown isn't trolling... [/quote]
That is a better response than yours, and exemplifies how As respond to me.
[/quote]
This caller was an idiot that just keeps talking in circles about a question that is not valid. Proof or evidence if not necessary to be an atheist. Some butt holes with their head up a child killers ass will never ever get this. Sound familiar?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 2791
Threads: 107
Joined: July 4, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 30, 2018 at 12:05 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2018 at 12:07 pm by drfuzzy.)
Ybe's own statements:
"There is lots of sufficient/convincing evidence for G by the way." #319
-- Despite claiming, multiple times, that he is not here to prove the existence of god. The moment evidence is claimed, evidence needs to be presented. And the claim of "there is lots of sufficient/convincing evidence" is an unsupported claim that your god exists. Poster is a liar with a "hidden" agenda by his own statements.
"Proof:
P1. If A's can"t give convincing/sufficient E (that As are able to logically reason), then As have no ability to judge E for G.
P2. I agree that As can't give convincing/sufficient E (that As are able to logically reason).
C. So, it is true they have no ability to judge (any E for G presented"
Completely ABSURD P1, since the repeated claim is that we have seen no evidence for the existence of god. We also have clearly stipulated our evidence requirements. No evidence has been presented, so there is nothing to judge. Which, of course, makes this snobbish disrespect of others absolutely hilarious.
[Assertion No G] (We can assume that "G" means "god" - although with gibberish text-speak, it could mean goblins, who knows?)
P1 If there is no G it would be illogical to believe in G ABSOLUTELY TRUE! BRAVO!
P2 No G Woopsie, here is where you slide for a lot of folks. The first premise started with IF, junior.
C. it is illogical What is illogical? "It" can be anything. Your claim just dropped into la-la-land right there. Grade: started good but ended up "F"
If no G, then no reason 4 responding. #326
We see no reason to believe that a "G" exists.
You apparently think that a "G" exists.
If you cannot provide the evidence that you claim exists in abundance, then there is NO REASON 4 THIS THREAD.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: Ybe an atheist
May 30, 2018 at 12:18 pm
Lol @ Shockofgod.
|
