Always nice to see the Republicunts here sticking up for Sexual Assaulters. It's not a surprise Their churches cover up sexual assault all the time. They're the pro-sexual assault party at this point. I wonder how many of them are guilty of sexual assault themselves.

Yep, we're a bunch of sexual assaulters watching out for each other. That's the Republican party in a nutshell.

(September 17, 2018 at 3:45 pm)alpha male Wrote: Yep, we're a bunch of sexual assaulters watching out for each other. That's the Republican party in a nutshell.

And they wonder why they are loosing the middle???

Remind me again who has the majority in both the senate and the committee and therefore ultimately decides the timing here?

(September 17, 2018 at 5:02 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Remind me again who has the majority in both the senate and the committee and therefore ultimately decides the timing here?

The Republicans. They set dates for hearings. Feinstein had the info and could have included it in the hearings. Why are you pretending that the Dem's actions aren't a factor here? Seems pretty disingenuous.

(September 14, 2018 at 2:51 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote:At the time, Kavanaugh was a high school student at the prestigious private Catholic Georgetown Preparatory School, in Bethesda.

It always seems to come back to this catholick shit, doesn't it?

Yup. They have custom and practice. Being raised catholic decades ago, I have some knowledge. It isn't nice.

(September 17, 2018 at 6:12 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(September 17, 2018 at 5:02 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Remind me again who has the majority in both the senate and the committee and therefore ultimately decides the timing here?

The Republicans. They set dates for hearings. Feinstein had the info and could have included it in the hearings. Why are you pretending that the Dem's actions aren't a factor here? Seems pretty disingenuous.

I never said they weren't a factor. I only noted that you don't really have any evidence for your claim. Your inference hinges on Feinstein believing that a full investigation of the matter would prove fruitless as well as the belief that a full investigation of the matter will actually prove fruitless, neither of which are facts in evidence. The rest is conspiratorial bullshit. Your suspicions of Democrats isn't evidence the last time I checked.

(September 17, 2018 at 6:55 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(September 17, 2018 at 6:12 pm)alpha male Wrote: The Republicans. They set dates for hearings. Feinstein had the info and could have included it in the hearings. Why are you pretending that the Dem's actions aren't a factor here? Seems pretty disingenuous.

I never said they weren't a factor.  I only noted that you don't really have any evidence for your claim.  Your inference hinges on Feinstein believing that a full investigation of the matter would prove fruitless as well as the belief that a full investigation of the matter will actually prove fruitless, neither of which are facts in evidence.  The rest is conspiratorial bullshit.  Your suspicions of Democrats isn't evidence the last time I checked.

Along with his need to defend Republican power plays

(September 17, 2018 at 11:30 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: And all of the sudden; anonymous hearsay, about an account that we have little details on; and happened about 40 years ago, is evidence.  For some, it sometimes appears, that evidence and reason is heavily dependent on what narrative the wish to tell.

Hey moron, she squeaked about this in 2012 long before the orange pussy grabber ran for office.

Quote:And all of the sudden; anonymous hearsay, about an account that we have little details on; and happened about 40 years ago, is evidence.  For some, it sometimes appears, that evidence and reason is heavily dependent on what narrative the wish to tell.

Wow trying to high jack a thread asking about an investigation into a sexual assault to serve your ideological bullocks you really have no moral center do you ?And accusing us of ideological bias when yours couldn't be clearer is just rich .

---

(September 17, 2018 at 11:17 pm)Brian37 Wrote:

(September 17, 2018 at 11:30 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: And all of the sudden; anonymous hearsay, about an account that we have little details on; and happened about 40 years ago, is evidence.  For some, it sometimes appears, that evidence and reason is heavily dependent on what narrative the wish to tell.

Hey moron, she squeaked about this in 2012 long before the orange pussy grabber ran for office.

Ah but you see it undermines Roadkills desire to see the Supreme court filled with Republican dido heads who will serve his attempts to drag the United States back to the dark ages .