Rapist?

(September 25, 2018 at 1:34 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:

(September 25, 2018 at 1:15 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: This seems to be an example of what I find disturbing about all this.  That it can't be talked about, and can't be questioned, without the accusations you made here.  That everyone is just to assume that judge Kavenaugh is guilty and if they don't, they must be attacked also.  I'm not saying any of what you asserted here.   

And your emotional plea about a wife or daughter, could also be made about a son or husband.   Would you wish for their life to be ruined, because of an accusation with little more than one persons word, and no other corroborating evidence.   Everyone else who could attest to this, as denied knowledge of the party all together, or denied the claim outright.  Those around him, say that the judge has always treated women with dignity and respect.  And the second claim is quite spotty, with even the woman claiming it, not being certain if it was Kavenaugh.  And this from a  group which largely says that testimony is not even evidence.

No what is disturbing is that there are people who want to not investigate the allegations because he is "their guy" if they are investigated and found to be false then that would exonerate him BUT the rush to potentially let a man become the life time arbiter of your countries laws while under investigation is alarming.

At this point the only reason to rush this through is because you fear not getting as conservative a person in that position, you fear losses in the near elections that would prevent it. You would rather have a rapist than a democrat as a top judge and that is all we need to know about you.

They are investigating it.  And have already delayed the confirmation vote because of this.

Quote:Noah questioned how a calendar submitted as evidence to deny sexual assault claims would hold up in Kavanaugh’s own court — “You look at my calendar, it says no crimes, all day” — or if anyone would believe him if he said in his own calendar that he went to Zumba every day at 6 a.m.

“If the man has a calendar,” Noah said, “then case closed. Because everyone knows that if it’s not on your calendar, then you never did s—.”

(Washington Post)

(September 25, 2018 at 1:57 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:

(September 25, 2018 at 1:34 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: No what is disturbing is that there are people who want to not investigate the allegations because he is "their guy" if they are investigated and found to be false then that would exonerate him BUT the rush to potentially let a man become the life time arbiter of your countries laws while under investigation is alarming.

At this point the only reason to rush this through is because you fear not getting as conservative a person in that position, you fear losses in the near elections that would prevent it. You would rather have a rapist than a democrat as a top judge and that is all we need to know about you.

They are investigating it.  And have already delayed the confirmation vote because of this.

They should take time and get it right as it is for life.

(September 25, 2018 at 2:03 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: They should take time and get it right as it is for life.

Says the man who calls him a rapist.

(September 25, 2018 at 2:03 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:

(September 25, 2018 at 1:57 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: They are investigating it.  And have already delayed the confirmation vote because of this.

They should take time and get it right as it is for life.

Which means what?   They don't have a location, a time (give or take a year or so), and all the other alleged witnesses deny it.   Where do you think that they are not getting it right?  What would be enough time?

(September 25, 2018 at 11:53 am)Divinity Wrote:

(September 25, 2018 at 11:03 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: We could just postpone all elections until this is resolved.

Why?  We didn't when Merrick Garland didn't get a hearing you stupid fucker.

The republitraitors just realised it'll take more than ten million citizens scrubbed from the register of electors to "win" this time, is why, a lot more.

---

(September 25, 2018 at 1:57 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:

(September 25, 2018 at 1:34 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: No what is disturbing is that there are people who want to not investigate the allegations because he is "their guy" if they are investigated and found to be false then that would exonerate him BUT the rush to potentially let a man become the life time arbiter of your countries laws while under investigation is alarming.

At this point the only reason to rush this through is because you fear not getting as conservative a person in that position, you fear losses in the near elections that would prevent it. You would rather have a rapist than a democrat as a top judge and that is all we need to know about you.

They are investigating it.  And have already delayed the confirmation vote because of this.

They're investigating it like you investigate the evidence for god fucktard. Grassley "Rapey McRapeface is a rapist, better supress all evidence of his crimes". You "there is no evidence for god, and strong evidence against. Better supress the evidence".

See, exactly the same.

(September 25, 2018 at 2:27 pm)Wololo Wrote:

(September 25, 2018 at 11:53 am)Divinity Wrote: Why?  We didn't when Merrick Garland didn't get a hearing you stupid fucker.

The republitraitors just realised it'll take more than ten million citizens scrubbed from the register of electors to "win" this time, is why, a lot more.

---

(September 25, 2018 at 1:57 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: They are investigating it.  And have already delayed the confirmation vote because of this.

They're investigating it like you investigate the evidence for god fucktard. Grassley "Rapey McRapeface is a rapist, better supress all evidence of his crimes". You "there is no evidence for god, and strong evidence against. Better supress the evidence".

See, exactly the same.

What is this suppressed evidence, and how do you know about it? Seems to me, that much like when discussing theology, you guys just attack the person and motivations, rather than dealing with the facts and issues at hand.

(September 25, 2018 at 2:45 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

But Jorm we should care more about protecting the reputation of a potential sexual assaulter then the victim 

---

The investigation by the Republicans is a sham .This deserves a full investigation by the FBI and she should neither have to deliver testimony or the confirmation should go ahead till it's completed. But Republicans don't care they simply want to get to taking away women rights and pushing through a Conservative agenda .If they need to confirm a sexual predator to do it they will.