Sarcasm =/= passive aggression. If this is going to be a last word thing, go ahead and have it. I tried to tell you politely that you can take it up with staff, but you've ignored me. There isn't much else I can do. I'm certainly not going to be the lone arbiter of your complaints.

So it begins...

Former DA Files Affidavit that Could Clear Cosby

Quote:In a new court filing Tuesday, former Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, District Attorney Bruce Castor confirmed that the civil depositions used to convict Bill Cosby of sexual assault should never have been used at all and the comedian agreed to waive his Fifth Amendment rights and sit for the queries knowing that the documents would always be kept private.

And, even if unsealed — as it eventually was — Castor said his agreement with Cosby was that no future district attorney could use them as a tool to prosecute the comedian.

In his bombshell filing, Castor also for the first time publicly acknowledges a long-standing feud between he and Montgomery County Judge Steven T. O’Neill, who presided over Cosby’s two trials, including the second trial that led to Cosby’s conviction on three counts of aggravated indecent assault.

With the new information, Cosby’s lawyers immediately filed a petition seeking to get the comedian released from prison. They also renewed calls for O’Neill to recuse himself from the case.

Quote:Castor reiterated that he didn’t prosecute Cosby because there was no evidence and Andrea Constand had repeatedly changed her story, did not have credibility and was not reliable.

Quote:“Before being sentenced for a crime he did not commit, Bill Cosby filed a motion demanding that Judge O’Neill provide a full accounting of his longstanding feud with and bias against Bruce Castor,” Camille Cosby said in a statement issued Tuesday by family spokespersons Ebonee Benson and Andrew Wyatt.

“The motion explained that Mr. Cosby, after the feud was disclosed in an unsourced tabloid article, retained a former FBI agent to investigate the judge,” Camille Cosby said. “The former agent discovered that there was in fact a longstanding feud between the two that dated back to a 1999 political campaign for DA.”

I was telling you guys this whole time the trial was a farce, yet all of you jumped on my case which leads me to believe that none of you are capable of critical thought so let's just stop pretending that atheists somehow have an monopoly on intelligence.

At any rate, this thread will not age well...

(October 24, 2018 at 12:42 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: So it begins...

Former DA Files Affidavit that Could Clear Cosby

Quote:In a new court filing Tuesday, former Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, District Attorney Bruce Castor confirmed that the civil depositions used to convict Bill Cosby of sexual assault should never have been used at all and the comedian agreed to waive his Fifth Amendment rights and sit for the queries knowing that the documents would always be kept private.

And, even if unsealed — as it eventually was — Castor said his agreement with Cosby was that no future district attorney could use them as a tool to prosecute the comedian.

In his bombshell filing, Castor also for the first time publicly acknowledges a long-standing feud between he and Montgomery County Judge Steven T. O’Neill, who presided over Cosby’s two trials, including the second trial that led to Cosby’s conviction on three counts of aggravated indecent assault.

With the new information, Cosby’s lawyers immediately filed a petition seeking to get the comedian released from prison. They also renewed calls for O’Neill to recuse himself from the case.

Quote:Castor reiterated that he didn’t prosecute Cosby because there was no evidence and Andrea Constand had repeatedly changed her story, did not have credibility and was not reliable.

Quote:“Before being sentenced for a crime he did not commit, Bill Cosby filed a motion demanding that Judge O’Neill provide a full accounting of his longstanding feud with and bias against Bruce Castor,” Camille Cosby said in a statement issued Tuesday by family spokespersons Ebonee Benson and Andrew Wyatt.

“The motion explained that Mr. Cosby, after the feud was disclosed in an unsourced tabloid article, retained a former FBI agent to investigate the judge,” Camille Cosby said. “The former agent discovered that there was in fact a longstanding feud between the two that dated back to a 1999 political campaign for DA.”

I was telling you guys this whole time the trial was a farce, yet all of you jumped on my case which leads me to believe that none of you are capable of critical thought so let's just stop pretending that atheists somehow have an monopoly on intelligence.  

At any rate, this thread will not age well...

And the other 59 women...…

If there is new evidence that exonerates him then we will think again. At the moment though he remains a convicted rapist who you support because.....
I don't know how to finish that sentence.

Or this will do nothing and you will still look like a tool defending a serial rapist based on nothing more then your wishful thinking and indeed this thread will not age well but not for us .

"The Washington Informer" eh, Huggy?

What's next?  The Enquirer?

Poor Bill.



If you pray harder god will fix it.

(October 24, 2018 at 1:04 pm)Minimalist Wrote: "The Washington Informer" eh, Huggy?

What's next?  The Enquirer?

 

What difference does the publication make in regards to this statement...

Quote:Castor reiterated that he didn’t prosecute Cosby because there was no evidence and Andrea Constand had repeatedly changed her story, did not have credibility and was not reliable.

Either Castor stated that or he didn't...

I have maintained that there WASN'T ANY EVIDENCE presented in the Cosby case

The previous DA has stated he didn't charge Cosby because THERE WASN'T ANY EVIDENCE.

Are you saying the former DA did not in fact make that statement?

(October 24, 2018 at 2:00 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:  

What difference does the publication make in regards to this statement...

bold mine. 

LOL Imma remind you again of your credibility regarding sources. It's ZERO. You lost all rights to be mad when someone else questions your "sources" considering that 99% of the time they:

1. aren't relevant or;
2. are from other nations AND;
3. are biased towards your own agenda.

(October 24, 2018 at 2:21 pm)Joods Wrote:

(October 24, 2018 at 2:00 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:  

What difference does the publication make in regards to this statement...

bold mine. 

LOL Imma remind you again of your credibility regarding sources. It's ZERO. You lost all rights to be mad when someone else questions your "sources" considering that 99% of the time they:

1. aren't relevant or;
2. are from other nations AND;
3. are biased towards your own agenda.

Well seeing how Cosby was convicted in a Pennsylvanian court room, Is this source credible?
https://atheistforums.org/thread-40199-p...pid1150458

(December 24, 2015 at 7:22 am)Joods Wrote: Pennsylvania is the fifth most corrupt state in the US as far as courts go.

 


Or how about CNN?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/17/cosby/index.html

Quote:In a press release posted on its Web site, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor said he "finds insufficient, credible and admissible evidence exists upon which any charge against Mr. Cosby could be sustained beyond a reasonable doubt.