Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 8:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The code that is DNA
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 6:21 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:
(December 24, 2019 at 4:26 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Ah. That is a question that the god-botherers avoid.

Exactly how many "micro-evolutionary" changes add up to a "macro-evolutionary" change?
What Richard Lenski proved was that macro evolution is impossible. After how many thousands of fruit fly generations, those flies  are ???
Guess what....wait for it........

Still fruit flies. Sorry but you probably should not have mentioned them, (the other poster above)

When did Lenski prove what you assertion, you addle pated bufoon? And show us some evidence.

What you are arguing is as idiotic as saying that "Newton showed us that white light splits into two colours not seven"
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 2:59 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Do you accept that paternity tests work, or do you not? Conceptually, it's fine if you don't. You would be wrong, but you will at least, then, have a position on the matter. What's not fine, conceptually, is when you decide to accept a certain set of evidence for a conclusion, and then reject that same evidence, for the same conclusion, in any other situation that it may arise. Then, you do not have a position.

A paternity test is not a phylogeny; and a phylogeny is not a paternity test. They are fundamentally different.
RE: The code that is DNA
Quote:A paternity test is not a phylogeny; and a phylogeny is not a paternity test. They are fundamentally different.
Keep telling yourself that
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 6:21 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:
(December 24, 2019 at 4:26 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Ah. That is a question that the god-botherers avoid.

Exactly how many "micro-evolutionary" changes add up to a "macro-evolutionary" change?
What Richard Lenski proved was that macro evolution is impossible. After how many thousands of fruit fly generations, those flies  are ???
Guess what....wait for it........

Still fruit flies. Sorry but you probably should not have mentioned them, (the other poster above)

[Image: 51lQlvzbD7L.jpg]
[Image: EvolutionForDummies.jpg]
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 6:21 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:
(December 24, 2019 at 4:26 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Ah. That is a question that the god-botherers avoid.

Exactly how many "micro-evolutionary" changes add up to a "macro-evolutionary" change?
What Richard Lenski proved was that macro evolution is impossible. After how many thousands of fruit fly generations, those flies  are ???
Guess what....wait for it........

Still fruit flies. Sorry but you probably should not have mentioned them, (the other poster above)

Fruit flies so genetically different from each other that they can no longer mate. What did you think they would evolve into? Horses? You’re either an idiot or a liar for Jesus.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 8:43 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(December 25, 2019 at 6:21 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: What Richard Lenski proved was that macro evolution is impossible. After how many thousands of fruit fly generations, those flies  are ???
Guess what....wait for it........

Still fruit flies. Sorry but you probably should not have mentioned them, (the other poster above)

Fruit flies so genetically different from each other that they can no longer mate. What did you think they would evolve into? Horses? You’re either an idiot or a liar for Jesus.
Id love to see him tell  Richard Lenski what he wrote here .I'm sure he would have a good laugh.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 8:43 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Fruit flies so genetically different from each other that they can no longer mate. What did you think they would evolve into? Horses?

A horse sounds about right since macroevolution operates above the species level. The spawning of a new species of flies through the criteria of reproductive isolation, is not macroevolution, it's speciation at best.
RE: The code that is DNA
Quote:A horse sounds about right since macroevolution operates above the species level. The spawning of a new species of flies through the criteria of reproductive isolation, is not macroevolution, it's speciation
Nope but keep pushing you creationist ignorance .And know that mainstream science laughs at it .
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
I heard some big words once.

The hypotenuse of the extrapolation is equal to the Pythagorean theorem divided by the quantum mechanics of the diversified combustion.
RE: The code that is DNA
(December 25, 2019 at 9:19 pm)no one Wrote: I heard some big words once.

The hypotenuse of the extrapolation is equal to the Pythagorean theorem divided by the quantum mechanics of the diversified combustion.
The trick is understanding the big words .

Quote:Keep in mind I extracted those 4 points from your statement:
Translation distorted what fake  said
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 4496 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Are humans half aliens? Human DNA question Signa92 14 2397 December 30, 2018 at 12:34 am
Last Post: Rahn127
Brick Atheist moral code Void 45 17193 March 24, 2015 at 8:14 pm
Last Post: I Am Not A Human Being



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)