Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 20, 2022, 2:34 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The code that is DNA
RE: The code that is DNA
[Image: icon_quote.jpg]Tater tot:
If you continue to run from this, IOW, you are lying, then anything henceforth you say is rubbish

Hey pot, have you met kettle?
RE: The code that is DNA
(January 5, 2020 at 9:39 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:
(January 5, 2020 at 6:26 pm)Nomad Wrote: This is yukon jack:

[Image: Fractal-wrongness.jpg]
Actually he more like 

[Image: 43004553944_b66b5ae4f2_b.jpg]
"Waaghh  your a meanie for criticizing James Tour and not giving  into my childish taunts "

"No your running away "

Hilarious Hilarious Hilarious Hilarious

Oh yeah, he's the five year old who runs off with the ball when the other kids won't play to his self imposed rule that only he can score goals.

Made in the image of predisent Dumbfuck.
The great appear great because we are on our knees. Let us rise!
Big James
RE: The code that is DNA
(January 6, 2020 at 3:08 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:
(January 5, 2020 at 9:10 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Yes she is because so far the answer is no.Oh and their is no such thing as an  evolutionist


No what would clear the air is you changing your poo filled nappies and stopping your childish table pounding . I'm sorry stating facts makes you feel bullied reality must be harsh then .And i think you should look up what running away means because i don't think you know .Anyhow James Tour committed a straw man deal with it .He's a sell out .And most of of his colleagues reject his conclusions .Science isn't built of celebrity status i just hope Tour enjoys becoming Sir Richard Owen the second .

Any any other childish taunts  you want to try ?

You charged Tour w a straw man, now tell us what it is. If you continue to run from this, IOW, you are lying, then anything henceforth you say is rubbish
I stated the fact that he did so .I have not run away from it nor have i lied .And as if i need a Creationist Dunning Kruger cry baby to value my words LOL .

Hehe Hehe Hehe

(January 6, 2020 at 4:01 pm)Nomad Wrote:
(January 5, 2020 at 9:39 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Actually he more like 

[Image: 43004553944_b66b5ae4f2_b.jpg]
"Waaghh  your a meanie for criticizing James Tour and not giving  into my childish taunts "

"No your running away "

Hilarious Hilarious Hilarious Hilarious

Oh yeah, he's the five year old who runs off with the ball when the other kids won't play to his self imposed rule that only he can score goals.

Made in the image of predisent Dumbfuck.

He's all like

"Waaaggghhh Waaagggh If you don't do what i say i won't value your words" As if anyone cares.

(January 6, 2020 at 3:26 pm)no one Wrote: [Image: icon_quote.jpg]Tater tot:
If you continue to run from this, IOW, you are lying, then anything henceforth you say is rubbish

Hey pot, have you met kettle?
The only rubbish between us is his

Hehe
“The sun from far gives life. But get close to it and it burns anything down to ashes”

[Image: flag-ukraine_1f1fa-1f1e6.png]  Heart [Image: canada-google.png]        

 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
I don't know what the particular straw man is supposed to be either, I can't view videos from work and I don't have time to at home. I did look up James Touring though, and found out what he had to say about being labeled a proponent of intelligent design:

"I have been labeled an Intelligent Design (ID) proponent. I am not. I do not know how to use science to prove intelligent design although some others might. I am sympathetic to arguments on the matter and I find some of them intriguing, but the scientific proof is not there in my opinion. So I prefer to be free of that ID label."

He has also said that he finds it hard to believe that nature can produce the machinery of cells through random processes. Not only is it inaccurate to describe the evolution of the 'machinery of cells' as a random process, his objection amounts to an argument from incredulity. His inability to understand how something could have happened does not make it less likely that it happened in the way he can't understand. And again, he is weighing in on a field that he does not work in, his contributions to science in the fields of carbon materials chemistry, materials science, and nanotechnology are very respectable, but they are not abiogenesis. He doesn't have to be an expert on abiogenesis to have something cogent to say about it, but scientists in the field he is critiquing are best qualified to assess his analysis and they don't find it convincing (and go right on synthesizing RNA by replicating conditions believed to have held in the era when life is considered most likely to have first formed).
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
RE: The code that is DNA
Sungula
“I stated the fact that he did so .I have not run away from it nor have i lied”

And now you’re being called on it. If you refuse to back up your charge then you are the incompetent bully your friends here are afraid to admit that you are.
You are a disingenuous fool, nothing personal but facts are facts
RE: The code that is DNA
Are you dense or something, @Yukon_Jack ?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard P. Feynman
RE: The code that is DNA
If he indicated in the video that if nature produced the 'machinery of cells' through random processes; that would be a mischaracterization of biological evolution, natural selection would have been key to that development and it's not random at all. As a mischaracterization of the actual claim of the theory, it would be a strawman.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
RE: The code that is DNA
Quote:Sungula
“I stated the fact that he did so .I have not run away from it nor have i lied”
The only true thing in your whole comment and it's not even your words 


Quote:And now you’re being called on it.

Nah your just pissing your pants because i stated the facts about Tour .I get that upsets you .I simply don't care 



Quote: If you refuse to back up your charge then you are the incompetent bully your friends here are afraid to admit that you are.
No if i refuse to play your games and ignore you infantile tuants  i'm simply doing that ,And the people on this forum have never been shy about criticizing me so we can put that nonsense to rest .




Quote:You are a disingenuous fool, 
Being called a disingenuous fool by a disingenuous  fool doesn't man much to me 


Quote:nothing personal but facts are facts
Yes thy are so one wonders why the fact Tour committed a straw man gets your panties in a bunch  .As for me there is nothing you could say that i could take personally or seriously at this point . 


Now go clean your room  Hehe
“The sun from far gives life. But get close to it and it burns anything down to ashes”

[Image: flag-ukraine_1f1fa-1f1e6.png]  Heart [Image: canada-google.png]        

 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
RE: The code that is DNA
According to Sungula, anyone can make any claim about someone that is unsubstantiated and that’s ok.
That’s libelous, see how far that gets you, it doesn’t work on me or anyone w an honest brain.
so for the record, Tour made NO straw man and Sungula is a dishonest atheist for saying so

(January 8, 2020 at 12:17 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: If he indicated in the video that if nature produced the 'machinery of cells' through random processes; that would be a mischaracterization of biological evolution, natural selection would have been key to that development and it's not random at all. As a mischaracterization of the actual claim of the theory, it would be a strawman.

NO straw man whatsoever. Mutations are TOTALLY random. Do you understand Darwinism don’t you?
RE: The code that is DNA
Why do you have such a hard-on for Sungula? You know there is more to the forum than this thread, right?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are humans half aliens? Human DNA question Signa92 14 1081 December 30, 2018 at 12:34 am
Last Post: Rahn127
Brick Atheist moral code Void 45 13625 March 24, 2015 at 8:14 pm
Last Post: I Am Not A Human Being



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)