Rev. Rye Wrote:And the fact that you believe that the big bucks are in vaccines, the vast majority of which are taken once or maybe three times in one's lifetime, when there's money to be made in pills and drugs that people take DAILY, shows how little you understand pharmaceuticals.

I said their priority is money before our health not that strawman u have built

Most of those vaccines were released under contracts that said they were to be taken out once the out break was contained. They lied

They may be more money in daily pills, i don't know but we're talking about mandating and that's everyone. 
If they mandate the flu/corona shot worldwide thats almost 8 billion people, every year. Just sayin

Rev. Rye Wrote:no, they came back not because the vaccine failed, but because parents decided to stop vaccinating their kids and then they got it.

So if it was only the anti vaxxed that got it then the vaxxed have nothing to worry about.

Another dangerous thing is the side effects. Death is a sideffect for some of those vaccines. 
One of them has a probability that kills 7,000 Americans per year when the total deaths from that disease is less than 100 per year
But everyone is just like uh dumb dumb right wing. Seeing everything through their thick socialist spectacles. Ideologically driven

Rev. Rye Wrote:Technically, he's an "Agnostic with Christian values." But I'm guessing that mostly means he parrots whatever bullshit the right-wing propagandists of Australia (Rupert Murdoch, it seems, since he owns 76% of the circulating papers, and Australia's only cable provider) tell him.

A couple of interesting things there. Im not just parroting the right wing media but what if somebody is?
Your parroting the left wing media (vax) and someone else is parroting the right wing media (anti vaxx)
Two views, both say their right and are backed by medical experts. How does a non political person choose. 
Pick the most popular. Flip a coin. No thanks

You guys have no confidence in any vaccine. If Trump releases a vaccine you guys don't trust him either. 
You can flip the coin if u want to be a guinea pig. I'll be fine

@Agnostico Maybe you could try the new Bleach Vaccine. Let us know how that works for you.

(April 24, 2020 at 7:54 am)brewer Wrote:

(April 24, 2020 at 2:08 am)Agnostico Wrote: I know this is a touchy topic. Your only pissed off cos the vaccines are unreliable
My decision has nothing to do with u if your vaxxed

I didn't say tetnus was eliminated. I showed how it is a very low risk now
Im not sure what the federal statistics bureau is called in America but there is nothing stopping you from confirming that graph
Here are 3 links that confirm it

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-m...tanus.html
https://bbmicroproject.weebly.com/epidemiology.html
https://infograph.venngage.com/p/81279/tetanus

We have been thinking about this for quite a while for our kids now and we have spoken to several doctors
But i'll mention that after. First im hoping some one can see some reasoning in my last post

Jesus fucking muhammad, you don't even read (or can't understand) the information in your own links.

Spoken to what kind of doctor? Give the names/degrees.

I'm pissed because I'm a health care professional and you're a stupid idiot unnecessarily risking lives.

The weebly.com site states you can cure autism with homeopathy. This should alleviate all your vaccine worries.

IDIOT TROLL!

The links all have the same graph. Ur just crying cos u got refuted

Over here a child gets blacklisted from schools if they don't get inoculated. But they fucked up when they decided to charge doctors for giving their medical opinion
It only served to frustrate many doctors who were being silenced

Some of these doctors are in defiance of the totalitarian state. So we've got shit sorted

No more drugs for my babies from these vaccine criminals

Don't know what the situation is elsewhere but the vaccines being developed in the UK are being done as a matter of public health and will be released to the WHO.
ie; free or at cost.

Here's a question. So u guys are ok with mandatory corona vax

How about tracking apps, digital chips, nano tech, ID2020
Over here our leader said he'll end the lockdown if 40% of the population sign up to this covid tracking app
He said if not enough people sign up he might mandate it

ID2020 is some advanced nano tech stuff. Look into it if ur interested

So what do u say? Mandated tracking?
Right, wrong, yes, no?

Most u guys are post-modern Marxists so im guessing mandated tracking ain't no thang

(April 24, 2020 at 10:29 am)Agnostico Wrote: Here's a question. So u guys are ok with mandatory corona vax

How about tracking apps, digital chips, nano tech, ID2020
Over here our leader said he'll end the lockdown if 40% of the population sign up to this covid tracking app
He said if not enough people sign up he might mandate it

ID2020 is some advanced nano tech stuff. Look into it if ur interested

So what do u say? Mandated tracking?
Right, wrong, yes, no?

Most u guys are post-modern Marxists so im guessing mandated tracking ain't no thang

Here's a question. So u guys are ok with elephants roaming the savanah?

How about elephants riding Segways in Walmart?

(April 24, 2020 at 10:29 am)Agnostico Wrote: Here's a question. So u guys are ok with mandatory corona vax

How about tracking apps, digital chips, nano tech, ID2020
Over here our leader said he'll end the lockdown if 40% of the population sign up to this covid tracking app
He said if not enough people sign up he might mandate it

ID2020 is some advanced nano tech stuff. Look into it if ur interested

So what do u say? Mandated tracking?
Right, wrong, yes, no?

Most u guys are post-modern Marxists so im guessing mandated tracking ain't no thang

Are you 12?

What's with the text speak?

The time you save typing 'u' instead of 'you' should at least be used to educate yourself...or pulling your head out of your ass.

You do realize that the mandatory COVID app is different from a vaccine, right? That it’s shockingly easy to sidestep by just not taking your phone wherever you go? And that, since not only are asymptomatic carriers still a thing, but there’s some compelling evidence that they’re the ones driving the spread, this can only work if EVERYONE is tested regularly for COVID, something that authorities still say is not a good idea?

TL;DR: The biggest moral difference between the COVID tracking app and a vaccine is that the app is a nonstarter. Well, that and vaccines are more likely to actually stop the spread of the virus.

And, once again, I would like to point you to what happened in Samoa a few months ago: parents stopped vaccinating their children for measles, an outbreak happens, a bit less than 3 percent of the population gets the disease, and the outbreak stops only when the government steps in and mandates vaccines. This happened about four to six months ago. I can’t help but notice you keep ignoring this major recent object-lesson in why your views have failed.

(April 24, 2020 at 9:15 am)Agnostico Wrote: The links all have the same graph. Ur just crying cos u got refuted

Over here a child gets blacklisted from schools if they don't get inoculated. But they fucked up when they decided to charge doctors for giving their medical opinion
It only served to frustrate many doctors who were being silenced

Some of these doctors are in defiance of the totalitarian state. So we've got shit sorted

No more drugs for my babies from these vaccine criminals

You saw the graph but failed to read any of the documentation. Silences many doctors, how many doctors? What's the percent of the medical population in Australia that have been sanctioned? Give documentation, not opinion you ass.

Opinion's from quacks are shit. The doctors promoting shit should be charged and have their licenses revoked. Non-vaccinated children should be excluded. Your child's right to attend school stops when they are a potential threat to other children's health. Same as your child taking a gun to school, it may never go off, but you don't get to expose other parents children to unnecessary risk.

Wakefield (the dr that started all of this) noticed a coincidence that autism most often occurs shortly after immunization, one specific immunization. Therefore immunization causes autism. He has nothing else to back this up. Doesn't matter that autism always occurred around that age, even before vaccination. Should the medical community practice based on coincidence? By being an antivaxxer that's your position. Show me one piece of medical evidence (not testimony) that vaccines cause autism

Let's make another medical determination based on coincidence. When I run it's hard to breath and my legs hurt, therefore running is damaging my body, therefore nobody should ever run. Stupid, right? Welcome to Wakefield's world.

Your babies should be taken from you.

SCHMUCK TROLL!

Quote:No more drugs for my babies from these vaccine criminals

Fair enough. If you take all the money you’re going to save on vaccines, you could invest it carefully, and eventually save enough to buy some child-sized coffins.

Boru