(May 14, 2021 at 6:35 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:

(May 14, 2021 at 5:43 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Functional?

Jesus h. Christ are you a hysterical twat or what?


1. No trap door.
2. Height of noose off floor - about 3 foot.


You might be able to hang a midgett - but he could probably get by standing on his toes.....

If he didn't resist or kick too much - the crossbeam supporting the rope doesn' t appear to be very solidly mounted on the uprights...

Functional....

Yeah.. Right...

Okay, so perhaps it wasn't the most functional of designs but what I get from this is this "unplanned" raid on the capital included people who just happened to have the things necessary to build a gallows.  

It was obviously a symbol of intent if nothing else.

Given that he’s arguing that building a gallows on the site of a protest where people are demanding the hanging of the Vice-President (who is in a building right next to where the protest is) doesn’t really count, and the fact that he’s devoted threads to arguing that someone placing pipe bombs at the RNC and DNC headquarters isn’t so bad if the designs were rudimentary enough to be disabled, as well as arguing that the fact a man has repeatedly expressed a desire to assassinate Joe Biden and has the armory to do so shouldn’t be held against him in a court of law (to be fair, he does condemn the fact that the man had CP in his possession), I think it’s safe to assume that in Biker’s world, intent is not something worth taking into account when it comes to crime.

(May 14, 2021 at 7:21 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: No doubt.

There were several laws broken.

Mostly minor.

And - next person to scream "insurrection" - I will take off the gloves and show how STUPID you are....

I double dog dare you....

insurrection (n): : an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.

Boru

Quote:No doubt.

There were several laws broken.

Like trying to overthrow the government and trying to kill government officials 

Quote:Mostly minor.

Those are minor crimes apparently...

Quote:And - next person to scream "insurrection" - I will take off the gloves and show how STUPID you are....

IT WAS AN INSURRECTION!!!

Quote:I double dog dare you....

Challenge accepted

[quote pid='2038085' dateline='1621019142']

(May 14, 2021 at 3:03 pm)Drich Wrote: which is what? trump supporters in the video i posted were allowed in to the capitol you can not deny that. this filled the building sholder to shoulder with people. and the news media have also identified the major ajatators as being members of antifa. I have video on my phone of a identified antifa guy wearing a trump hat trying to smash a window in the capitol building to gain entry, and was not only stopped by the real trump crowd was tuned up for damaging the building. i have maybe 5 or 6 videos like this were antifa have been identified wearing trump hats causing problems. not to say all trump people were without guilt. what i am say is out of a crowd of one million plus... a few hundred agitators does not a riot make. what buildings were burned down what targets were looted what cvs were looted for drugs and burned down? what hospitals were filled with the gun shot and wounded.

LMAO. *you* the dripshit noticed this and everyone else in the country missed it ?
You're far worse off then I thought.
110 % psychotic. Divorced from Reality.  
[/quote]

---

Drippy 

Quote:And - next person to scream "insurrection" - I will take off the gloves and show how STUPID you are....

Threats are acceptable here ?
You wear gloves in Florida, bag-lady ?

The thing is Dripshit, the Insurrection Commission is coming.
All your lies will be exposed for all to see.
No one actually buys your bullshit.

And BTW, the policeman who died of a stroke, got smacked on the head.
He did not die by natural causes. He died from a process that began when he was hit on the head.
The pathologist who said he did die by natural causes will get cross-examined in court and be shown to be a fool, in the civil suit, which his family will win.
They will challenge his idiot findings. If I were him, I'd worry about my license.

It’s strange that he sees the same thing that everyone did, and instead of thinking there’s some degree of complicity within the Capitol police, like most of the people who saw it, decided it’s a sign that the insurrection wasn’t so bad after all.

(May 14, 2021 at 9:48 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: It’s strange that he sees the same thing that everyone did, and instead of thinking there’s some degree of complicity within the Capitol police, like most of the people who saw it, decided it’s a sign that the insurrection wasn’t so bad after all.

Yeah because it's not like the police are loaded with Tumpists or anything 

And it's not like any of those officers were disciplined for letting them in

(May 14, 2021 at 7:40 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(May 14, 2021 at 7:21 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: No doubt.

There were several laws broken.

Mostly minor.

And - next person to scream "insurrection" - I will take off the gloves and show how STUPID you are....

I double dog dare you....

insurrection (n): : an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.

Boru

Exactly.

Now.....


Since WHEN is the President ELECT the head of the government? Never? Not till he is sworn in?

...

WHO was the President during this "period of insurrection"?


This is no small point. And it' s not a " functional gallows".


President Trump cannot be charged with insurrection - unless you are charging that he conspired to have himself overthrown - AS HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE.GOVERNMENT AT THAT TIME.

Did he incite a riot? Arguably so. Is he a monumental asshat? Again - that' s an easy arguement to make. Did he attempt to nullify a legal election? Sure looks like it.

But - you are an idiot trying to redefine crimes by saying it was insurrection..

That's not how American government works. We don't elect kings.

(May 14, 2021 at 10:46 pm)Angrboda Wrote: That's not how American government works.  We don't elect kings.

Nobody said we did.

Quote:Exactly.

Now.....


Since WHEN is the President ELECT the head of the government? Never? Not till he is sworn in?

The government is more than the Administration in the Whitehouse. They literally tried to override the results of an election and tried to stop branches of the government from carrying out one of their functions. Therefore the definition applies.

Quote:WHO was the President during this "period of insurrection"?

Irrelevant they attempt to stop the government from carrying out its function and I'm pretty sure trying to kill the VP of the current administration in power counts as trying to overthrow the government. Thus the definition applies 

Quote:This is no small point. And it' s not a " functional gallows".

Irrelivant

Quote:President Trump cannot be charged with insurrection - unless you are charging that he conspired to have himself overthrown - AS HE WAS THE HEAD OF THE.GOVERNMENT AT THAT TIME.

Trying to kill the VP and trying to stop the government from carrying out the peaceful transition of power qualifies as insurrection. An Insurrection doesn't have to be carried out against the president any of the branches of government would still qualify. Hell even flaunting the authority the government has over the peaceful transition of power would qualify.

Quote:Did he incite a riot? Arguably so. Is he a monumental asshat? Again - that' s an easy arguement to make. Did he attempt to nullify a legal election? Sure looks like it.

He clearly incited an insurrection to prevent branches of the government from carrying out the peaceful transition of power and the insurrection he clearly incited attempted to kill a member of the current administration. 

Quote:But - you are an idiot trying to redefine crimes by saying it was insurrection..

No, he's accurately describing what happened. It's you who is trying to define crimes in a way that doesn't work. 

Your a fucking clueless moron