(May 17, 2021 at 4:54 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Looking at your ramblings on who the Capitol police answer to, I actually did a little research.

I found that the Capitol Chief of Police, well, here's what the official website of the Capitol Police says "The Chief reports directly to the Capitol Police Board and is assisted in the management of the Department by the Assistant Chiefs of Police and the Chief Administrative Officer." And while I don't know who the Capitol Police Board reports to, the head of the Police Board, the name "Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate" does point in a different direction from Pelosi.

And did you actually read the Business Insider article you cited as a source? Because it points to another reason the Capitol PD shit the bed so bad that day.

Quote:the Pentagon issued memos in the days prior to Trump's White House rally restricting District guardsman from interacting with protesters; accessing ammunition or riot gear; sharing equipment or resources with other law enforcement agencies; or using National Guard technology without the sign off of the Defense Secretary.

And, yes, we are aware that there were claims that the election was fraudulent. And not one of them ended up working in the Republicans' favour.

glob....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Police_Board
 today consists of three voting members: the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol. Additionally, the chief of the Capitol Police serves ex officio as a non-voting member.[3] The chairmanship of the board alternates annually between the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms. [3]


NowNow... the only question that needs to be asked is does the , take direction from polsi? Yes the speak of the house often direct the sergeant at arms of the house. this can be witnessed ceremonially everytime the president has a state of the union.

or simpler yet. If the , on his own decided to tell the chief of the capitol police to let those protesters in, would polsi have the authority to bring him up on charges and or have his fired? remember she fired the chief of police for "mismanagement of the insurrection" Now ask yourself could one of the board act against the other three and his orders be carried out? could this guy act alone or did the board make a call and the chief did what he was told?

If the chief got fired and he was just following orders. why wasn't the person who issued those orders also fired?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/pelosi-says-capitol-police-chief-should-go-over-maga-riot-breach

She didn't fire him. She called for him to be fired, which implies she doesn't have the power to do so herself. The article you posted says that outright.

The CHAZ movement didn't storm the US capital to interfere with a national election.

(May 17, 2021 at 4:13 pm)Drich Wrote:

(May 17, 2021 at 12:55 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: So what, Dripshit. You are so fucking gullible and childish.
Your cherry picked video does not tell the story. Either you know that, and lying, or you're just stupid. Maybe both.
The full SET of videos are what they are. They are not "single source" anything. 
The Insurrection Commission will look at everything that happened, and fool liar and deniers, not unlike yourself, will be shown to be the traitirs you are.
"Some" of the cops will be found to be complicit in the crimes, as everyone knows. What, you live under a rock. Oh well. You do. Even an active duty Marine was an assaulter.
The fact that a few criminal cops let some in, does not give anyone the right to even *go*in, and certainly not to destroy all that government property.
Yeah, you cherry pick your videos, and then lie abut what actually happened. You're such a low-life.
Your god Trump LIED and said he would go down to the capitol with them. He ABANDONED them. THEY have said that. You're promoting mob rule, idiot. 
We also get you actually know nothing about the riot/insurrection. MULTIPLE (that means more than one Drippy) entrances to the capitol were entered and breached.
NOT just the one where the crooked police let them in.

Let me make it simple at your simple level.
If a security guard lets in some burglars to a business, does that make it OK  for the burglers to destroy and rob shit ?
That's what you're saying here, that it is OK.

Multiple sources. 




videos. 

Videos are PRIMARY source material.  
Wrong again, ... we can turn the SOUND OFF, and watch for ourselves what happened. 
BTW It's "videos ARE", my ignoramus friend, who claims dyslexia .... but is too stupid to install a spell/grammar checker.  

Quote:That is the difference between primary source material ( actual unedited eye witness film) 
Secondary material (eye witness testimony/someone telling you who was there what had happened)
Tertiary material, like you news cast/someone explaining third hand what had happened.

Ya see you ignoramus, you don't even get what you just said. 
A video, (whether commented on or not, is primary. 

"A primary source is a first-hand or contemporary account of an event or topic. ... Primary sources are original materials, regardless of format. Letters, diaries, minutes, photographs, artifacts, interviews, and sound or video recordings are examples of primary sources created as a time or event is occurring."
https://library.shu.edu/primarysources#:...0occurring.

As far as fake government propaganda ... TRUMP was "the government" at  the time. You think HE ratted himself out. 
Jesus you are stupid. Speaking of TRUMP's proaganda. LMAO
You are THE most incredible thing ever posting here.... so I guess you should know about "credible" OR NOT

Quote:Like how my video refutes the idea that the crowd in masse tried to loot an destroy the capitol building. that this same crowd identified someone who was trying to break a window as intifa in a trump hat, not only stopped him but beat him up for his trouble. it wasnt till after this person was well under control and those people had all calmed back down did the police react with gas. which triggered the panic the news clip showed, and announced it as a crowd of people trying to break in, while they were trying to get away from the gas. it is completely disgusting how you allow yourself to be manipulated and controlled just to paint your neighbor in the worst possible light. not only that you sell every ounce of integrity to do it.

bla bla bla, bla bla bla. Total 100 % bullshit.
Like I need a sermon from the most delusional guy in the world.
You're far more stupid than anyone even imagined. Your video refutes nothing.
The videos I posted are primary sourced material, and they PROVE what Dripshit says is 100 % false.

Trump Cultism 101

Kevin McCarthy, REPUBLICAN House leader, blames Trump for the (yes) riot.
Multiple sourced. Video of McCarthy is primary source.
If even the House Republcan leader, who WAS IN the house chamber the day of the riot, calls it a riot, ... and that Trump was responsible, guess what Drippy ?
There was a riot.
Many many multiple eye-witnesses, many many photos prove Drippy to be a liar. He wasn't there. The witnesses were there. The photos are primary sources.

(May 17, 2021 at 5:14 pm)Drich Wrote:

(May 17, 2021 at 4:54 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Looking at your ramblings on who the Capitol police answer to, I actually did a little research.

I found that the Capitol Chief of Police, well, here's what the official website of the Capitol Police says "The Chief reports directly to the Capitol Police Board and is assisted in the management of the Department by the Assistant Chiefs of Police and the Chief Administrative Officer." And while I don't know who the Capitol Police Board reports to, the head of the Police Board, the name "Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate" does point in a different direction from Pelosi.

And did you actually read the Business Insider article you cited as a source? Because it points to another reason the Capitol PD shit the bed so bad that day.


And, yes, we are aware that there were claims that the election was fraudulent. And not one of them ended up working in the Republicans' favour.

glob....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Police_Board
 today consists of three voting members: the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, and the Architect of the Capitol. Additionally, the chief of the Capitol Police serves ex officio as a non-voting member.[3] The chairmanship of the board alternates annually between the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms. [3]


NowNow... the only question that needs to be asked is does the , take direction from polsi? Yes the speak of the house often direct the sergeant at arms of the house. this can be witnessed ceremonially everytime the president has a state of the union.

or simpler yet. If the , on his own decided to tell the chief of the capitol police to let those protesters in, would polsi have the authority to bring him up on charges and or have his fired? remember she fired the chief of police for "mismanagement of the insurrection" Now ask yourself could one of the board act against the other three and his orders be carried out? could this guy act alone or did the board make a call and the chief did what he was told?

If the chief got fired and he was just following orders. why wasn't the person who issued those orders also fired?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/pelosi-says-capitol-police-chief-should-go-over-maga-riot-breach

The speak of the house was polsi ? 
I was not aware of the position "speak of the house". Does polsi ever meet with Pelosi ?

I see your lyin' -ass pres Trump told another bald face lie .... he knows the Arizona recount is finding nothing, so he had to get in front of that, and create another conspiracy theory, that the entire Arizona voter data-base had been deleted. He didn't know the Arizona Sec State was actually looking at it at the time. Woops.

(May 17, 2021 at 5:14 pm)Drich Wrote: If the chief got fired and he was just following orders. why wasn't the person who issued those orders also fired?

He was.  He's been moping around central florida like a common geriatric ever since.

Drich's research methodology:



Boru

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...48332.html
Primary evidence of Andrew Clyde barricadiing the doors of the capitol.
He says the rioting was the same as "tourists".
LOL

These fuckers will give up their integrity for the clown named Trump.

Aso there is an hilarious defense of the QAnon "Shaman", (the guy with the horned headdress), by his attorney.

Quote:Watkins told Shuham, "A lot of these defendants — and I'm going to use this colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully — but they're all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they're fucking retarded, they're on the goddamn spectrum. But they're our brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers — they're part of our country. These aren't bad people; they don't have prior criminal history. Fuck, they were subjected to four-plus years of goddamn propaganda, the likes of which the world has not seen since fucking Hitler."

https://www.rawstory.com/qanon-shamans-l...ce-hitler/
Sound like anyone we know ? LOL