It also has an outdated term. Which is about race mixing. But i do feel that was more on the... paranoia elements of people who went with that term

When i mean race communism, i mean its comparable to race politics, of people such as Adolf Hitler. But done for different reasons. Hitler was a Race politician. But he argued more on the basis of Aryan Whites against non Whites. Whereas a Race Communist will argue causes for the sake of non Whites against Whites.

This is different from the typical Classless type of politics that some Communists will argue for. Modern examples of this is either Kyle Kulinski or Hasan Piker. For example. They will attack Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses, absolute monarch (Islamism) and all those things. But be massively silent on Iran. Why? Because Iran is anti Western proxy of China.

But whats your view on this?

I should also note. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, maybe not a socialist. But he was part of a political movement that Liberals seems to support. Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether its the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy

(August 20, 2026 at 3:12 pm)PepsiMAX Wrote: It also has an outdated term. Which is about race mixing. But i do feel that was more on the... paranoia elements of people who went with that term

When i mean race communism, i mean its comparable to race politics, of people such as Adolf Hitler. But done for different reasons. Hitler was a Race politician. But he argued more on the basis of Aryan Whites against non Whites. Whereas a Race Communist will argue causes for the sake of non Whites against Whites.

This is different from the typical Classless type of politics that some Communists will argue for. Modern examples of this is either Kyle Kulinski or Hasan Piker. For example. They will attack Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses, absolute monarch (Islamism) and all those things. But be massively silent on Iran. Why? Because Iran is anti Western proxy of China.

But whats your view on this?

I should also note. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, maybe not a socialist. But he was part of a political movement that Liberals seems to support. Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether its the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy

I’ve never heard the term Race Communism but looking it up, it seems be one of those White Supremacist dog whistle.

Where in the blue fuck did you get the idea that Woodrow Wilson was a progressive??

Boru

I think race is a mostly artificial construct and it needs to go the way of the dodo.

We are one human family.

I value a colorblind society. I don't think we are there, but it is the ideal that I would advocate.

I'm thinking PepsiMAX is Leonard 2.0.

(August 20, 2026 at 3:12 pm)PepsiMAX Wrote: It also has an outdated term. Which is about race mixing. But i do feel that was more on the... paranoia elements of people who went with that term

It would be difficult to be more wrong about a thing.  It is, however, a fact that segregationists make constant attempts to conflate the two.

Quote:When i mean race communism, i mean its comparable to race politics, of people such as Adolf Hitler. But done for different reasons. Hitler was a Race politician. But he argued more on the basis of Aryan Whites against non Whites. Whereas a Race Communist will argue causes for the sake of non Whites against Whites.

Doesn't sound like different reasons, sounds like different races, and also scared shitless whitemaxxing. 

Quote:This is different from the typical Classless type of politics that some Communists will argue for. Modern examples of this is either Kyle Kulinski or Hasan Piker. For example. They will attack Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses, absolute monarch (Islamism) and all those things. But be massively silent on Iran. Why? Because Iran is anti Western proxy of China.

But whats your view on this?

Just so I have this right...what you want me to understand is that hasan piker is bad because he does the bad thing by being silent..or is it that hasan piker is bad and doing the bad thing because he won't shut up with views on the subject you deem to be anti white communism?

Quote:I should also note. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, maybe not a socialist. But he was part of a political movement that Liberals seems to support. Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether its the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy

Communists!  Communists everywhere.  Are The Communists in the room with you right now as well?

(August 20, 2026 at 3:12 pm)PepsiMAX Wrote: It also has an outdated term. Which is about race mixing. But i do feel that was more on the... paranoia elements of people who went with that term

When i mean race communism, i mean its comparable to race politics, of people such as Adolf Hitler. But done for different reasons. Hitler was a Race politician. But he argued more on the basis of Aryan Whites against non Whites. Whereas a Race Communist will argue causes for the sake of non Whites against Whites.

This is different from the typical Classless type of politics that some Communists will argue for. Modern examples of this is either Kyle Kulinski or Hasan Piker. For example. They will attack Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses, absolute monarch (Islamism) and all those things. But be massively silent on Iran. Why? Because Iran is anti Western proxy of China.

But whats your view on this?

I should also note. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, maybe not a socialist. But he was part of a political movement that Liberals seems to support. Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether it’s the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy

 
The bolded and italicized part were done by me.

I bolded it because the bolded part is pretty much what communism actually means. It sounds like what you’re describing as “race communism” has nothing to do with actual communism.

And noticing that you actually gave your own definition of Communism as “anything strong central government,” (italics also coming from me) covering everything between authoritarian regimes, the nation-states of a region working together to make trade smoother, or evidently, just having a functioning federal government at all, it would seem that most countries would have to be communist by default, unless they’re in war-torn parts of the world where the government is basically armed gangs (eg Haiti, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, the Congo, Libya post-Gadaffi).

Conclusion: you have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, maybe take some Political Science courses so you can at least make coherent claims.

(August 20, 2026 at 5:30 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(August 20, 2026 at 3:12 pm)PepsiMAX Wrote: It also has an outdated term. Which is about race mixing. But i do feel that was more on the... paranoia elements of people who went with that term

When i mean race communism, i mean its comparable to race politics, of people such as Adolf Hitler. But done for different reasons. Hitler was a Race politician. But he argued more on the basis of Aryan Whites against non Whites. Whereas a Race Communist will argue causes for the sake of non Whites against Whites.

This is different from the typical Classless type of politics that some Communists will argue for. Modern examples of this is either Kyle Kulinski or Hasan Piker. For example. They will attack Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses, absolute monarch (Islamism) and all those things. But be massively silent on Iran. Why? Because Iran is anti Western proxy of China.

But whats your view on this?

I should also note. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, maybe not a socialist. But he was part of a political movement that Liberals seems to support. Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether its the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy

I’ve never heard the term Race Communism but looking it up, it seems be one of those White Supremacist dog whistle.

Where in the blue fuck did you get the idea that Woodrow Wilson was a progressive??

Boru

Thats debatable. But all i know is Racism is the same as Opportunism. If one isnt defending itself? Then another group of people wants to kill or rape that group. Thats just how nature works. Just look at the difference between illegal immigration vs legal immigration

With legal immigration, it can be either good or bad. But usually if it doesnt work out, then the guy gets sent back. If the guy adjusts to the culture, language and becomes integrated. Then no problem.

With illegal immigration, it often involves the worst people often. Murderers and rapists. If you want proof? The no background check around immigration during 2015-2016 New Years Eve in Germany. There was also a movie that came out called (Citizen Vigilante) made by Uwe Boll. That adresses the cases of corrupt law enforcement, such as in Britain. Where they would just allow Pakistani rape and grooming gangs to happen, in order to not be called racist.

So sometimes. Its a tool by Race Commies, to either get more power? Or just create a new system imbalance against its own natives.

Either case. Racism is the same as Opportunism. Thats the issue in general.

edit: Woodrow Wilson was a progressive. Thats a literal historical fact!
Progressive era, he was a part of that. Look it up if you think i am lying.

(August 20, 2026 at 11:35 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(August 20, 2026 at 3:12 pm)PepsiMAX Wrote: It also has an outdated term. Which is about race mixing. But i do feel that was more on the... paranoia elements of people who went with that term

When i mean race communism, i mean its comparable to race politics, of people such as Adolf Hitler. But done for different reasons. Hitler was a Race politician. But he argued more on the basis of Aryan Whites against non Whites. Whereas a Race Communist will argue causes for the sake of non Whites against Whites.

This is different from the typical Classless type of politics that some Communists will argue for. Modern examples of this is either Kyle Kulinski or Hasan Piker. For example. They will attack Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses, absolute monarch (Islamism) and all those things. But be massively silent on Iran. Why? Because Iran is anti Western proxy of China.

But whats your view on this?

I should also note. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, maybe not a socialist. But he was part of a political movement that Liberals seems to support. Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether it’s the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy

 
The bolded and italicized part were done by me.

I bolded it because the bolded part is pretty much what communism actually means. It sounds like what you’re describing as “race communism” has nothing to do with actual communism.

And noticing that you actually gave your own definition of Communism as “anything strong central government,” (italics also coming from me) covering everything between authoritarian regimes, the nation-states of a region working together to make trade smoother, or evidently, just having a functioning federal government at all, it would seem that most countries would have to be communist by default, unless they’re in war-torn parts of the world where the government is basically armed gangs (eg Haiti, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, the Congo, Libya post-Gadaffi).

Conclusion: you have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, maybe take some Political Science courses so you can at least make coherent claims.

I got most of my political science from Deus Ex 2000 game. But i am studying currently at University. So its gonna be interesting to what rhetorics they would argue for, in the framework of Liberal Democracy. I also studied the book called "Battle Cry of Freedom" by James McPherson, relating to the American Civil War.

Why should I care about communism?

(August 21, 2026 at 12:45 am)PepsiMAX Wrote:

(August 20, 2026 at 11:35 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:  
The bolded and italicized part were done by me.

I bolded it because the bolded part is pretty much what communism actually means. It sounds like what you’re describing as “race communism” has nothing to do with actual communism.

And noticing that you actually gave your own definition of Communism as “anything strong central government,” (italics also coming from me) covering everything between authoritarian regimes, the nation-states of a region working together to make trade smoother, or evidently, just having a functioning federal government at all, it would seem that most countries would have to be communist by default, unless they’re in war-torn parts of the world where the government is basically armed gangs (eg Haiti, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, the Congo, Libya post-Gadaffi).

Conclusion: you have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, maybe take some Political Science courses so you can at least make coherent claims.

I got most of my political science from Deus Ex 2000 game. But i am studying currently at University. So its gonna be interesting to what rhetorics they would argue for, in the framework of Liberal Democracy. I also studied the book called "Battle Cry of Freedom" by James McPherson, relating to the American Civil War.

Here's a good place to start if you're looking for a basic understanding of what political ideologies mean, here's a decent enough place to start: 




Admittedly, there's always going to be some complications in explaining all the nuances, but I can tell you one thing for sure: any political science teacher worth their salt is going to laugh their heads off when you define communism as "anything strong central government."