Posts: 242
Threads: 7
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:21 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 5:22 pm by Hovik.)
(July 15, 2012 at 5:18 pm)Shell B Wrote: Hovik, you knew I would respond. You thought you would have the maturity to stick by your assertion that you would no longer respond to me. You couldn't. Believe me, you're not the first like you and this isn't the first time I have had to deal with a big fat pussy who stomps off because someone was a meanie poo and then came back in and tried to play the bigger person. Language is not my problem here. It is yours. Every time you bang your hairy knuckles on the keyboard, you spout another strawman. Suck my ass.
I haven't seen such bone-crushing insults since middle school.
Shit, you're a child. Grow the fuck up.
Ex Machina Libertas
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:22 pm
Why don't you go back two pages. I'm not holding your hand.
Hovik, some of them have been found guilty of terrorism, thus bring terrorists into the United States. Paint chips are not food.
Posts: 242
Threads: 7
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 5:22 pm)Shell B Wrote: Why don't you go back two pages. I'm not holding your hand.
Hovik, some of them have been found guilty of terrorism, thus bring terrorists into the United States. Paint chips are not food.
Have all of them been found guilty?
Get back to me when that happens, then you'll have an argument.
Ex Machina Libertas
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 5:21 pm)Hovik Wrote: (July 15, 2012 at 5:18 pm)Shell B Wrote: Hovik, you knew I would respond. You thought you would have the maturity to stick by your assertion that you would no longer respond to me. You couldn't. Believe me, you're not the first like you and this isn't the first time I have had to deal with a big fat pussy who stomps off because someone was a meanie poo and then came back in and tried to play the bigger person. Language is not my problem here. It is yours. Every time you bang your hairy knuckles on the keyboard, you spout another strawman. Suck my ass.
Shit, you're a child. Grow the fuck up.
Oooo, sick burn. The big bad Shell hurt your feelings? Quit attributing shit to me that I did not say and I won't ream you a new asshole. Comprende, kiddo?
Posts: 2694
Threads: 42
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
43
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:24 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 5:22 pm)Shell B Wrote: Why don't you go back two pages. I'm not holding your hand.
Hovik, some of them have been found guilty of terrorism, thus bring terrorists into the United States. Paint chips are not food.
Explain it again, in your own words. I want to know your answer as to not misinterpret it. Obviously, since Hovik and I eat paint chips, we are very, very stupid and need things spelled out for us.
Posts: 242
Threads: 7
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:24 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm)Shell B Wrote: (July 15, 2012 at 5:21 pm)Hovik Wrote: Shit, you're a child. Grow the fuck up.
Oooo, sick burn. The big bad Shell hurt your feelings? Quit attributing shit to me that I did not say and I won't ream you a new asshole. Comprende, kiddo?
Oh yeah, I feel so reamed. You're nothing but pettiness wrapped in condescension.
Ex Machina Libertas
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:25 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm)Hovik Wrote: Have all of them been found guilty?
Get back to me when that happens, then you'll have an argument. That was never her argument. She said "many" of them were guilty. Since some of them are guilty (and were convicted, etc), the stats support her assertion.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:25 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 5:27 pm by Shell B.)
(July 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm)Hovik Wrote: (July 15, 2012 at 5:22 pm)Shell B Wrote: Why don't you go back two pages. I'm not holding your hand.
Hovik, some of them have been found guilty of terrorism, thus bring terrorists into the United States. Paint chips are not food.
Have all of them been found guilty?
Get back to me when that happens, then you'll have an argument.
I didn't say all of them were guilty. Why are you so frustratingly obtuse? I don't know what to say to you anymore. You are seriously such an idealistic twit that a fucking nuke could not penetrate the lead that is your cranium. Go cry about how mean I am to someone who gives a shit. Waste of fucking time.
(July 15, 2012 at 5:24 pm)Hovik Wrote: (July 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm)Shell B Wrote: Oooo, sick burn. The big bad Shell hurt your feelings? Quit attributing shit to me that I did not say and I won't ream you a new asshole. Comprende, kiddo?
Oh yeah, I feel so reamed. You're nothing but pettiness wrapped in condescension.
Pettiness? Pettiness would be to throw a shit fit and change all of your posts to say "I eat my own shit." I'll give you condescension. I have nothing but derision for your dishonest tactics. I have no wish whatsoever to treat you with any respect. You're a peacock strutting for your girlfriend. Nothing more.
(July 15, 2012 at 5:25 pm)Tiberius Wrote: (July 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm)Hovik Wrote: Have all of them been found guilty?
Get back to me when that happens, then you'll have an argument. That was never her argument. She said "many" of them were guilty. Since some of them are guilty (and were convicted, etc), the stats support her assertion.
Don't bother. I have said the same thing twelve different ways. They can't read.
Posts: 2694
Threads: 42
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
43
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:32 pm
Maybe you need your eyes checked. :/
You have no reason to say "many" are guilty. You have no reason to say any who have not been tried are guilty. You have no EVIDENCE.
Posts: 6191
Threads: 124
Joined: November 13, 2009
Reputation:
70
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 5:33 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 5:36 pm by Autumnlicious.)
With regards to actual terrorists in the GITMO:
For the ones that are guilty and convicted, should they not be locked up in our most secure facilities, where they cannot get free?
I am a little confused over what security having a prison set in another country brings other than a legal gray zone.
Are our best prisons deficient for holding criminals of the worst kind?
Or is the property of 'terrorist' make one suddenly more unholdable (in our own prisons) than any domestic terrorist we've had to date (McVeigh, Unabomber, et al)?
What real security threat is there that does not exist already in and on the US borders?
Also, everyone, cut out the personal attacks and sniping. This thread has gone childish over a high level topic.
Y'all are adults. That means "she/he did it first" doesn't excuse one when one fires back.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
|