(November 15, 2012 at 6:02 am)Darnem Wrote: Why do you push your religion of Atheism on others when there is no evidence that God doesn't exist?

So much fail in one post, it's pretty difficult to think of where to begin.

Oh, wait:

(November 15, 2012 at 6:13 am)5thHorseman Wrote: Obvious troll is obvious, but......

Atheism isn't a religion. Try harder.

2 questions to believer.

Why do you troll this site with such moronic questions?

Why do you believe a book that was written off 3rd hand info 30-70 years after the supposed fact?

The End.

(November 20, 2012 at 9:00 am)Darnem Wrote:

(November 20, 2012 at 8:25 am)festive1 Wrote: You're on the Atheist Forums... You came here to start shit, to convert people (hahahahaha)... You can't kick the atheists off of our own forum... That's akin to us going to a church and telling everyone, "Get the fuck out, nothing to see here!"

How, from my previous post, do you manage to make that reply?
The 1+1=11 shit was metaphor for me coming here and "starting shit"
My response is what any half smart human being would do. Yet here we are, 20 pages later.

I shouldn't be surprised though. This is an Atheist forum after all...[/b]

(November 21, 2012 at 9:36 am)Daniel Wrote:

Quote:If these are both sins, then do you have a problem with a homosexual couple marrying and enjoying non-adulterous sex?

I have exactly the same problem with any homosexual couple as with any de-facto couple. I think Christians who don't treat them exactly the same way are double-sighted. Yes homosexual sex and relationships is a sin, but it's not unique and it's no different to heterosexual fornication and de-facto relationships.

So if two people of the same sex are married it is no longer a sin then.

That'l be one for the books hey Bebe??

(November 21, 2012 at 10:52 am)Kirbmarc Wrote: You carefully dodged my point. I can't see how the Anglican Church can be against divorce if it was founded because a man wanted to divorce.

It wasn't "founded" by Henry VIII. He would have accepted ANY church that allowed him to divorce. He didn't even agree with the theology of the protestants! All he did was separate the English Church from Rome.

Yeah Pretty much like all Anglicans eh Daniel??

You will accept anything that will up hold your narrow world view??

I'd rather have my "narrow" world view than yours mate.

Quote:It wasn't "founded" by Henry VIII.

I didn't say that. I say it was founded because a man wanted a divorce, not by a man who wanted a divorce.

My objection still stands: how can the Anglican Church oppose divorces when the act who stated its independence from Rome was granting a divorce?

(November 22, 2012 at 9:16 am)Daniel Wrote: I'd rather have my "narrow" world view than yours mate.

And the prosecution rests.....

The defendant is of no value to humanity and will not concede that his world view will ever be expanded from the narrow band it currently holds. The defendant has also conceded that he would rather perpetuate hatred, greed and religious supremacy instead of world peace in support of his narrow world view, and one can only assume that the persecution of women and children will be supported by this poor excuse of a hominid named Daniel.

I give you the jury to decide this individual creature's fate.

(November 22, 2012 at 9:16 am)Daniel Wrote: I'd rather have my "narrow" world view than yours mate.

At the risk of being a stirrer, I'd like to ask what you believe our "world view" to be?