I think the last pagan stepped out a ways back, actually....so the pickings are gonna be pretty slim on that count.

(July 2, 2013 at 1:37 am)fr0d0 Wrote: What do you think of this Missy C?

I think Inigo puts it perfectly:

(July 1, 2013 at 7:52 pm)Inigo Wrote: And why do you keep saying 'come from god'? My claim is that morality requires a god to exist. Water requires H20 in order to exist, because water IS h20. But water doesn't 'come from' H20 does it?


1. Morality's instructions are instructions that confer reasons for compliance to any and all to whom they are addressed.
2. Only the instructions of an agent who has control over our interests in an afterlife and wishes to harm those interests should we fail to do as she instructs/favours would be instructions that would confer a reason to comply to all to whom they are addressed.
3. Morality is an agent of the kind outlined in 2 above.

An agent of that kind is, on common usage, 'a god'.

I think you're in denial about what God is. The version of God you relate is anti God. It's self contradictory/defeats itself. I think you're perfectly justified in rejecting it.

You have a problem, I think, divorcing that concept from anything which vaguely resembles it.

I'd like an explanation as to what you believe is the concept that I have trouble divorcing myself from, then a reason why you believe your beliefs are exempt from my reasoning. I don't see anti god, in relating what the 'holy words of god' say compared to the character of such god. Its possible to judge a judges' character by his judgements is it not?

I do think what inigo (sounds suspiciously similar to previously banned inDigo) says is circular because what he says starts with an assumption that refers its appeal to authority back on that assumption without an outside confirmation.

Morality is just a word. We all base our morality on different things; I base mine on existencial rights knowing full well that no one is enforcing those rights. Some people base theirs on those of the society they believe in, some people don't even believe morality exists. I agree to a point. The point being that because we exist we have rights and nothing circumstancial about our lives (like being born to a prince or a Canaanite) can change our status or the implied righrs that go along with that status. Even monkeys understand its bad to eat that treat if it means pushing a button that electricutes another monkey in order to get it. Inigos implied belief that morality is something that was implemented by a god would have evidence backing up his clai'm and there isn't anything observable in nature that gives a solid basis of rules of morality. Rather what I see are for the m ost part unconnected acts and behaviour being blanketed by a generalized word called morality that neither describes a class of rules nor implies a rule maker by default.

(July 2, 2013 at 8:44 pm)ronedee Wrote:

(July 2, 2013 at 8:11 pm)Rhythm Wrote: That's about as poignant a question as "Why are you on atheistforums.com?"

"touching" question?

eh... enlightening pagans about Christianity. You won't see me elsewhere in this forum btw.

Two things....
1st, this is "atheistforums.org"
B. Let's play the True Pagan™ game, I'll go first.

Human sacrifice is a pagan practice which is not condoned in the Bible. Is a person who participates in the act or benefits from the act a pagan? I say yes...

True Pagan Game?
Hell yes!

(July 2, 2013 at 10:58 pm)missluckie26 Wrote: I'd like an explanation as to what you believe is the concept that I have trouble divorcing myself from, then a reason why you believe your beliefs are exempt from my reasoning.

Simple. God is good. His essence is good. He is that thing. That is the Christian understanding of God.

Your concept of God is the opposite from that. You cannot consider this subject without applying your own concept, which explains the rub between Christians and yourself. Our base points are polar opposites.

So I'm the opposite of good?




Why don't you try to rEally answer, Fr0d0? I know you have it in you

(July 3, 2013 at 3:04 am)fr0d0 Wrote:

(July 2, 2013 at 10:58 pm)missluckie26 Wrote: I'd like an explanation as to what you believe is the concept that I have trouble divorcing myself from, then a reason why you believe your beliefs are exempt from my reasoning.

Simple. God is good. His essence is good. He is that thing. That is the Christian understanding of God.

Your concept of God is the opposite from that. You cannot consider this subject without applying your own concept, which explains the rub between Christians and yourself. Our base points are polar opposites.

So god is good because of what?

Because he says so.

So Stalin is good because of what?

Because he says so.

Yet in both cases their actions are anything but good.

I'll judge some one because of their actions, not their words.

Because that's the only way God works Zen. If God is not good then creation fails. It's the only way God makes sense.

Missy C

You're the opposite of good??? What?!

I was gonna add more but I can't now with this spanner in the works

You want God to make sense, Fr00dy?

What's a spanner? I'm going to have to conclude that you've checked out of the conversation entirely since you don't want to or can't rebute me coherently. God is good is not a reply to what I said. Try again, please.