Sexual harassment laws are feminists main way of pushing sexphobia upon us.

So I see you don't know anything about the history of sexual harassment. Grow up, little man.

Quote:Harassment can include "sexual harassment" or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.

How is one to know if sexual advances are unwelcome if they don't make them to see if they are rejected? It is an attack on freedom & coercive. Feminists are weak & must use our petty system to get their way.

(January 29, 2014 at 5:49 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 5:45 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Wait. So, because you can't get laid, it's society's responsibility to get you laid? No thanks. You're on your own.

You are clearly just a feminazi who wants to keep PC "sexual harassment" laws. It is just as much a society's duty to ensure all its members are sexually satisfied as it is to ensure that all members have sufficient water & food.

Do you ever think through your ravings? It seems not.

You are talking about a tiny fringe population and blowing it out of all proportion.

Get a grip.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Th...llegations

Almost all of the time (I would estimate over 99%) sexual harassment allegations are false. Take for example the ones made about Clarence Thomas, when he never even did anything wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Th...llegations

(January 29, 2014 at 9:52 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

Quote:Harassment can include "sexual harassment" or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.

How is one to know if sexual advances are unwelcome if they don't make them to see if they are rejected? It is an attack on freedom & coercive. Feminists are weak & must use our petty system to get their way.

You are such a stereotypical teenager, you might be a teenager Poe. I can't stand teenagers.

The HISTORY of sexual harassment is very very important in this context. You can throw around insults, make your opinions known, and be as wrong as you want, but the fact of the matter is there are REASONS sexual harassment laws exist, and they have nothing to do with "feminazis" (seriously, I might have to put you on ignore, because every time I see that fucking word I want to go Patrick Bateman on your ass).

(January 29, 2014 at 6:23 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: No, the feminazis are the ones who support sexual harassment laws. People who disagree with me aren't feminazis, the feminazis are the ones who are sexphobic. It is a good thing most women see through the degeneracy of feminism!

You don't seem to understand what those laws are or their purpose.
How old are you, 15?

What in fuckall does bullshit about sexual harassment have to do with showing three feminists with acknowledged stands against consensual sex between mature adults?

You're out of your fucking mind if you think one is evidence for the other.

The challenge stands, and your failure to meet it shows you're full of shit, just like I said.

(January 29, 2014 at 6:05 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 6:02 pm)Beccs Wrote: ANd so he should have. The same if any kid said a male teacher had a nice dick.

Inappropriate - especially from a kid in a school situation.

No, society should have an open attitude about sex. You are clearly a prude in need of re-education.

---

(January 29, 2014 at 6:00 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Who said anything about banning it? I said it was rude. There are rules at school, which are in place to teach young people how to get along in society. Rudeness doesn't do people well out in the big bad world. Therefore, rudeness is punished.

---

Who's saying people don't have the right to have sex with consenting partners? And what in the sam hill does that have to do with feminism?

You did. You are the one who said society does not have the responsibility of sexually fulfilling all its members.

Right to sex? Re-education? You're an authoritarian freak.

(January 29, 2014 at 9:59 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 9:52 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: How is one to know if sexual advances are unwelcome if they don't make them to see if they are rejected? It is an attack on freedom & coercive. Feminists are weak & must use our petty system to get their way.

You are such a stereotypical teenager, you might be a teenager Poe. I can't stand teenagers.

The HISTORY of sexual harassment is very very important in this context. You can throw around insults, make your opinions known, and be as wrong as you want, but the fact of the matter is there are REASONS sexual harassment laws exist, and they have nothing to do with "feminazis" (seriously, I might have to put you on ignore, because every time I see that fucking word I want to go Patrick Bateman on your ass).

They were made up by feminists to block out free speech & destroy liberty.

---

(January 29, 2014 at 10:02 pm)rasetsu Wrote:


What in fuckall does bullshit about sexual harassment have to do with showing three feminists with acknowledged stands against consensual sex between mature adults?

You're out of your fucking mind if you think one is evidence for the other.

The challenge stands, and your failure to meet it shows you're full of shit, just like I said.

Pure ad hominem. That is all feminists can do because they have no facts on their side.

---

(January 29, 2014 at 10:04 pm)Gish Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 6:05 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: No, society should have an open attitude about sex. You are clearly a prude in need of re-education.

---

You did. You are the one who said society does not have the responsibility of sexually fulfilling all its members.

Right to sex? Re-education? You're an authoritarian freak.

A libertarian society forst requires certain changes to happen to society & humanity itself before the government can be dissolved.

It is the anti-free speech feminists who are authoritarian.