Posts: 3022
Threads: 34
Joined: May 11, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:26 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:20 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Please refrain from using foul language..thanks. 
Don't tell me what to do fuck face
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain
'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House
“Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom
"If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech
Posts: 19788
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:26 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2014 at 7:32 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(May 5, 2014 at 7:25 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:24 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Um, like . . . creationism? 
No, this makes perfect sense to me and billions of other people.
So did a flat earth, and sun going around the earth. Science is not done by billions of people. Billions of people are usually wrong, and like you, most people are more interested in lying to themselves than trying to find out what really is the truth. That's why they don't hand out real PhDs in natural sceince with the Gideon bible in every cheap motel.
Posts: 30671
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:27 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:20 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 11:59 am)Bad Wolf Wrote: Now Rev has confirmed what we all knew before. He is a total nutcase!
A world wide conspiracy amongst all scientists! Keep living in your dream world fucknut.
Please refrain from using foul language..thanks.
I'll stop calling you an intellectually dishonest fuck when you stop acting like one.
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:28 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2014 at 7:29 pm by Revelation777.)
(May 5, 2014 at 12:26 pm)Stimbo Wrote: He said working hypothesis.
Now that is a low blow. 
(May 5, 2014 at 3:13 pm)Minimalist Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:04 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Show me the evidence that it accrued.
Why? If you read it you wouldn't understand it.
You just keep believing that your god did everything in 6 fucking days. It's all you can handle.
Leave the heavy thinking to the adults.
Faith my dear Watson, Faith. 
Posts: 19788
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:29 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:28 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:26 pm)Stimbo Wrote: He said working hypothesis.
Now that is a low blow.
No blow can be too low for something so base as creationism.
Even the lowest blow goes right over your head.
Posts: 44271
Threads: 532
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:30 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:25 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:24 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Um, like . . . creationism?
No, this makes perfect sense to me and billions of other people.
Luckily, science is not a democratic process. If 90% of the world's population believed deeply, sincerely, and devoutly in creationism, it would still be rubbish.
In other words, it doesn't matter a whit what you and others think 'makes sense'. What matters is that it be demonstrable, predicative, and repeatable.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 19788
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:31 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2014 at 7:31 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(May 5, 2014 at 7:28 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Faith my dear Watson, Faith.
Replace "faith" with "idiotic wishthinking", or "obdurate ignorance" and the meaning of the expression would be the same.
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:31 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 12:37 pm)eyemixer Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:21 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am open to learning Science, but not working hypothesis that can't get past first base.
You do not speak honestly. Evidence that your self claimed Christianity does not follow the basic teachings of your messiah figure.
P.S. Unless you believe that the teachings of Jesus are optional and not dictated by god, I don't want to claim to know your relationship with your messiah figure.
Not following you here.
Posts: 19788
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:32 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:37 pm)eyemixer Wrote: You do not speak honestly. Evidence that your self claimed Christianity does not follow the basic teachings of your messiah figure.
P.S. Unless you believe that the teachings of Jesus are optional and not dictated by god, I don't want to claim to know your relationship with your messiah figure.
Not following you here.
If you can't follow it, then it is probably sophisticated enough to actually have a shot at being true.
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 7:33 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2014 at 7:34 pm by Revelation777.)
(May 5, 2014 at 12:40 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:21 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I am open to learning Science, but not working hypothesis that can't get past first base.
Hundreds of millions of not billions of people grasp it and 'get it' just fine. Some of those people go further and attempt to build on huge theory and disseminate their findings to others. The weight of evidence is astounding, and it gets stronger each and every day as more research is conducted to challenge and advance the theory.
Then we have you, and your argument from ignorance.
Who are people more likely to take notice of?
Many many many reject abiogenesis.
(May 5, 2014 at 12:53 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 12:44 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Mendacity or stupidity come to mind, but I am open to the possibility of there being another alternative that I haven't considered.
Fundamentalist or Evangelical include mendacity and stupidity quite nicely.
I hope you get saved. Then it will not be stupidity.
|
