Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 7:18 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
#31
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
I wonder if we scared him away? Thinking
Reply
#32
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
I hope not. That wouldn't give me a chance to participate in a scientific debate where no science is presented.
Reply
#33
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
(November 1, 2014 at 2:52 pm)Surgenator Wrote: I hope not. That wouldn't give me a chance to participate in a scientific debate where no science is presented.
He did mention "evolution", that is kinda science-y, I think.Angel
Reply
#34
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
I always love how these fuckheads who claim to know so much about "Darwin" don't seem to know that he was a creationist.

Quote:Authors of the highest eminence seem to be fully satisfied with the view that each species has been independently created. To my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator, that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual. When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled. Judging from the past, we may safely infer that not one living species will transmit its unaltered likeness to a distant futurity.

--Charles Darwin, Origin of Species, Chapter 14

Of course, Darwin was writing in 1860 and can be forgiven for being a creatard. Modern creatards get no such dispensation!
Reply
#35
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
(November 1, 2014 at 2:31 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: I wonder if we scared him away? Thinking

As much as that would make us badass, no. We call these, "shit & run" posters. Or pigeons on a chessboard, if you prefer.
Reply
#36
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
I like how this post has turned into, for the most part, people just telling me how stupid I am. Also, as I stated in the original post, this was not meant to be a religious debate yet somehow my beliefs are being attacked even though nobody here actually knows what my beliefs are. If you disagree with what I said or think that I'm not educated enough on the topic that's fine because the point of debating is to bring arguments to the conversation to enlighten your opponents. Yet somehow this has turned into the classic "You don't believe what I believe so you're stupid" party. Thanks to the few people on here that actually made good points so I can continue to expand my knowledge on the topic.

(November 1, 2014 at 5:09 pm)LastPoet Wrote:
(November 1, 2014 at 2:31 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: I wonder if we scared him away? Thinking

As much as that would make us badass, no. We call these, "shit & run" posters. Or pigeons on a chessboard, if you prefer.

Actually I have a 7 week old son and a full time job so I don't have 24 hours a day to keep checking posts.
Reply
#37
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
We're still waiting for evidence and not your opinion.

Why don't you get the chip off your shoulder and cut to the chase?

You have already made a lousy first impression.
Reply
#38
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
(November 2, 2014 at 1:35 am)Rob216 Wrote: I like how this post has turned into, for the most part, people just telling me how stupid I am. Also, as I stated in the original post, this was not meant to be a religious debate yet somehow my beliefs are being attacked even though nobody here actually knows what my beliefs are. If you disagree with what I said or think that I'm not educated enough on the topic that's fine because the point of debating is to bring arguments to the conversation to enlighten your opponents. Yet somehow this has turned into the classic "You don't believe what I believe so you're stupid" party. Thanks to the few people on here that actually made good points so I can continue to expand my knowledge on the topic.

(November 1, 2014 at 5:09 pm)LastPoet Wrote: As much as that would make us badass, no. We call these, "shit & run" posters. Or pigeons on a chessboard, if you prefer.

Actually I have a 7 week old son and a full time job so I don't have 24 hours a day to keep checking posts.

Sincere congrats for both! So if you have time, what do you think about the scientific objections to your assertion?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#39
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
(November 2, 2014 at 3:03 am)Minimalist Wrote: We're still waiting for evidence and not your opinion.

Why don't you get the chip off your shoulder and cut to the chase?

You have already made a lousy first impression.

Well you already called me a fuckhead so I'm not quite clear on why my opinion or any evidence I could possibly bring up would be worth a damn to you anyways. Plus, I'm not a fan of feeding trolls.

(November 2, 2014 at 4:21 am)Alex K Wrote:
(November 2, 2014 at 1:35 am)Rob216 Wrote: I like how this post has turned into, for the most part, people just telling me how stupid I am. Also, as I stated in the original post, this was not meant to be a religious debate yet somehow my beliefs are being attacked even though nobody here actually knows what my beliefs are. If you disagree with what I said or think that I'm not educated enough on the topic that's fine because the point of debating is to bring arguments to the conversation to enlighten your opponents. Yet somehow this has turned into the classic "You don't believe what I believe so you're stupid" party. Thanks to the few people on here that actually made good points so I can continue to expand my knowledge on the topic.


Actually I have a 7 week old son and a full time job so I don't have 24 hours a day to keep checking posts.

Sincere congrats for both! So if you have time, what do you think about the scientific objections to your assertion?

I'm not trying to minimize my response so I apologize for being vague but I estimate that I literally have about 5 minutes to get this response in. In general, I love opposing views so I'm not gonna slam anyone for their objections. I think a lot of people got off track because I do believe that evolution occurs in all species. I thought my objections were to Darwin, but perhaps I need to do some more research on Biogenesis because honestly this post was the first time that I've heard that term. Also, going back and reading my original post, I did a poor job in wording what I was actually trying to say. What I meant to say in a nutshell is that there is no evidence of species changing kinds. By which I mean in the lineage of any species there is no link (that I know of anyways) over the timeline of a species existence that shows that it could've changed from bacteria to fish to a amphibian etc etc that it has just been theorized. I really just want someone to show me that there is proof somewhere of that link in a species lineage. Any species. If somebody did and I accidentally passed it up then I apologize but I'll go back and read all the posts when I have time. But I really do want proof I'm not just saying that to poke at people. I'm not gonna stand in the face of something tangible and choose not to believe it just because I believe in God. My belief is that I should be open to believing everything.

Oh, and thanks for the congrats!
Reply
#40
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
"My life has taught me that true spiritual insight can come about only through direct experience, the way a severe burn can be attained only by putting your hand in the fire. Faith is nothing more than a watered-down attempt to accept someone else's insight as your own." -Damien Echols
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why there is no reason to believe in evolution FreethinkingSceptic 12 2449 March 6, 2026 at 4:25 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Why do the religious hate evolution? WinterHold 20 5818 February 18, 2019 at 1:09 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Theory of Evolution, Atheism, and Homophobia. RayOfLight 31 10367 October 25, 2017 at 9:24 am
Last Post: Jackie
  Panspermia theory? mediocrates 28 9544 May 24, 2017 at 9:05 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Heated debate on evolution with brother MyelinSheath 182 82569 May 7, 2017 at 8:13 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Test My Theory: Macro evolution DOES happen? Gawdzilla Sama 44 21520 December 20, 2016 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: RoadRunner79
  Giulio Tononi's Theory of Consciousness Jehanne 11 6050 September 18, 2016 at 6:38 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Darwin's Voyage on the Beagle, droll dramatization Alex K 2 1460 September 17, 2016 at 9:45 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Why Debate a Teenager? Goosebump 16 6822 April 25, 2016 at 11:10 am
Last Post: Aegon
  The simple body test that proves the theory of evolution TubbyTubby 17 5550 March 22, 2016 at 5:50 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)