(February 17, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: I thought to save arguments for the skeptics section.

Except that you are not a skeptic.

(February 17, 2015 at 11:02 pm)Sionnach Wrote:

(February 17, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: I thought to save arguments for the skeptics section.

Except that you are not a skeptic.

Razulxe-Quite right. Im not skeptic of theism neither atheism. I am theist and cannot blame an atheist of their belief.

I rest my case.

What's to blame?

(February 17, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote:

---

(February 17, 2015 at 10:54 pm)Sionnach Wrote: It's easy.

He's a theist not an atheist.

I understand the dynamics of the theistic mind.

I thought to say arguments for the skeptics section.

---

(February 17, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: I thought to save arguments for the skeptics section.

---

Is this your first time using public forums? Maybe you should try this one first - http://www.kidzworld.com/forums
You know - to get some practice forming sentences... Hard enough to take theists seriously even when they're trying to make coherent statements.

(February 17, 2015 at 10:52 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote:

(February 17, 2015 at 10:49 pm)Sionnach Wrote: You like making assumptions?

I do, you must be naive. Making assumptions keeps me from being a real chump.

When it comes to being a chump you are royalty.

(February 17, 2015 at 11:04 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: I am theist and cannot blame an atheist of their belief.

What belief would that be? The belief that your statements are rather dull, incoherent, incredibly petty, and unoriginal? No please blame me. I've taken a lot of time out of my life to really understand why that is in fact the case with your types.

Can you define this creator so we know what we are debating?

(February 17, 2015 at 10:41 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: Creator implies an illogical idea that I can only describe as a being. If I say "someone", it may imply as a being with a mind as small as us. And a being who could have made the things we use to contradict "its" existance. Possibilities at such a level cannot be logical or hardly understood as a possibility.

In that case, where do you get off claiming that a creator DOES exist?

(February 17, 2015 at 11:28 pm)Nestor Wrote:

(February 17, 2015 at 11:04 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: I am theist and cannot blame an atheist of their belief.

What belief would that be? The belief that your statements are rather dull, incoherent, incredibly petty, and unoriginal? No please blame me. I've taken a lot of time out of my life to really understand why that is in fact the case with your types.

The belief of science as in using it to contradict a creator whereas the idea of a creator contradics science.

---

(February 18, 2015 at 12:12 am)AFTT47 Wrote:

(February 17, 2015 at 10:41 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: Creator implies an illogical idea that I can only describe as a being. If I say "someone", it may imply as a being with a mind as small as us. And a being who could have made the things we use to contradict "its" existance. Possibilities at such a level cannot be logical or hardly understood as a possibility.

In that case, where do you get off claiming that a creator DOES exist?

Something you may never know.

---

(February 18, 2015 at 12:12 am)AFTT47 Wrote:

(February 17, 2015 at 10:41 pm)Razulxe 2 Wrote: Creator implies an illogical idea that I can only describe as a being. If I say "someone", it may imply as a being with a mind as small as us. And a being who could have made the things we use to contradict "its" existance. Possibilities at such a level cannot be logical or hardly understood as a possibility.

In that case, where do you get off claiming that a creator DOES exist?

(not christian)-If jesus did ever exist im sure he really did have to perform miracles to build christianity. Thats what it would take esspecially now that theres enough proof to deny a gods existence.