Posts: 599
Threads: 21
Joined: October 10, 2014
Reputation:
25
Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 1:51 pm
First of all this is not a question to stir the pot of weather homosexuality is a trait you are born with or not. It is also not a question of whether it is right or wrong. My question has come about from reading The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins (best book I have read so far). He talks about evolution and makes a very strong case for things evolving along a slow and steady slope up a mountain.
1. I believe that homosexual people are born homosexual
2. Most homosexuals (I assume) are born to heterosexuals
3. I understand how recessive genes can becoming dominant in a baby
My question is
1. Is homosexuality a recessive gene?
2. If it is, will homosexuals eventually become extinct because of their lack of ability to reproduce, thus eventually losing the recessive gene?
If I am way off please tell me. I am a nube to this whole evolution thing. No offense will be taken
Posts: 29716
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 2:09 pm
(This post was last modified: July 5, 2015 at 2:10 pm by Angrboda.)
Quote:Researchers looking for a genetic signature of homosexuality have been barking up the wrong tree, according to a trio of researchers in the United States and Sweden. Instead, the scientists posit, epigenetic influences acting on androgen signaling in the brain may underlie sexual orientation. In a paper published last week (December 11) in The Quarterly Review of Biology, they propose a model describing how epigenetic markers that steer sexual development in males could promote homosexual orientation in females, and vice versa. The scientists offer their model to explain both the tendency of homosexuality to run in families, and the fact that so far no “homosexual gene” has been identified.
Can Epigenetics Explain Homosexuality?
Scientists propose a new model for how homosexuality develops, but observers say it will be difficult to test.
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 2:15 pm
I do not think sexuality can be assigned to a black/white single gene or exclusively to them. I can't answer question 1 with a yes or no, so I will refrain from number 2.
Other than that, apo's post is apt in recent developments.
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
73
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 2:29 pm
No complex phenomenon can ever be ascribed to a single cause. Sexual orientation is not an exception. It comes from a mix of genetics, environmental factors and other circumstances; for example men who have older brothers are statistically more likely to be gay than those who don't.
Posts: 380
Threads: 17
Joined: February 10, 2015
Reputation:
12
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 2:37 pm
(This post was last modified: July 5, 2015 at 2:38 pm by Metis.)
I don't know if it is genetic or not, I've never really cared either. I grew up in a household where being gay was considered "good" or "bad", it just "is" so it's not something I investigated that much.
Supposing the premise is true though, and that Homosexuality is a recessive genetic characteristic I don't think it will die out for two reasons...
1) Religion: Haw haw I know right? Because many religions (notable exception to Catholic clergy and Buddhism) really big up the importance of siring as many children as humanly possible many LGBT end up in sham marriages where they do have children. The most religious and devout of these which these gays who have entered heterosexual marriages often are usually have many more children than the norm, particularly Mormons.
2) IVF: Had Gay rights come a few decades earlier this may have not worked but the simple truth is Lesbians can have children very easily, they can even have children with them both as the biological parent if the three-parent IVF method proves safe and is extended. For gay men it is harder but with surrogates not impossible, some gay men even team up with unmarried women to have children.
If it is genetic it's going to be around a good while yet, and curiously enough religious sexual repression is actually helping if it is the case.
Posts: 28367
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 2:40 pm
(July 5, 2015 at 1:51 pm)polar bear Wrote: First of all this is not a question to stir the pot of weather homosexuality is a trait you are born with or not. It is also not a question of whether it is right or wrong. My question has come about from reading The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins (best book I have read so far). He talks about evolution and makes a very strong case for things evolving along a slow and steady slope up a mountain.
1. I believe that homosexual people are born homosexual
2. Most homosexuals (I assume) are born to heterosexuals
3. I understand how recessive genes can becoming dominant in a baby
My question is
1. Is homosexuality a recessive gene?
2. If it is, will homosexuals eventually become extinct because of their lack of ability to reproduce, thus eventually losing the recessive gene?
If I am way off please tell me. I am a nube to this whole evolution thing. No offense will be taken 1. No. I believe it is genetic but not a recessive gene. Look at monozygotic twin studies.
2. If 1 is no, 2 can't be answered.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 3931
Threads: 47
Joined: January 5, 2015
Reputation:
37
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 5:43 pm
But the thing is, homosexuals are reproducing. Through surrogate mothers for gay males and sperm donorship for females, openly gay people are still having children probably at the same rate closeted homosexuals would have done before being gay was legalised. Again I think this is a misconception people make too much, being gay doesn't mean you are physically incapable of having children, you just can't have them with the same sex.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane" - sarcasm_only
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 6:18 pm
If it wasn't for mother nature's variances, none of us would be here.
We need to celebrate this diversity.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 7:04 pm
I'm of the opinion folks in my gay tribe share DNA with our brethren and cistern and THEY have a reproductive advantage in having gay siblings. And that's how the trait persists.
By the way, I'm aware of the younger brother thing, however, it is not a hard and fast rule, just a tendency. As it turns out, I'm the oldest and my youngest brother is disturbingly hetero.
One of my cousins has an oldest son who is gay, but we're not supposed to know. LOL!
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 380
Threads: 17
Joined: February 10, 2015
Reputation:
12
RE: Homosexual Biology
July 5, 2015 at 7:10 pm
(This post was last modified: July 5, 2015 at 7:11 pm by Metis.)
Yeah I have to say I don't know if that younger brothers are more likely to be gay thing is right, I'm the oldest and mine are all straight. My boyfriend is the fourth oldest of ten and they're all straight. Well, that we know of, I personally think number two is a horrible closet case stereotype but ANNNYWAAAAY...Off topic!
I've got a cousin like that too Vorlon, he's a hairdresser, he has lived with the same guy for years, he's a limpwrist who looks like he spray painted his clothes on but HE'S TOTALLY STRAIGHT according to his mother who still thinks nobody but her in the family knows.
|