Posts: 1011
Threads: 57
Joined: December 22, 2009
Reputation:
6
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2010 at 11:03 pm by ib.me.ub.)
Yeah, but the didn't decide to kill millions of innocent people for no reason. Fair enough, the Allies killed millions of innocent people as well, but in retaliation to German aggression, not for a racist idealogy.
Anyway, that wasn't the point of the responce. If Hitler hadn't killed millions of innocent people for no reason, he would be looked at in a much different way. History would have judged him and Germany much differently. The Germans probably would have won the war as well. The resources that went onto killing the Jews was massive & time consuming.
Also, if Hitler was replaced, the German strategy would have been much better. Hitler just made too many mistakes.
Posts: 48
Threads: 1
Joined: October 16, 2010
Reputation:
0
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:03 pm
(October 16, 2010 at 10:47 pm)ib.me.ub Wrote: The basic idea of a single world governmnet is a good one
Your political philosophy is 'differently able'.
"All these organized crime rackets fight eachother, so if we have one HUGE organized crime racket that controls everything, this will be productive, right?"
Fucking ridiculous.
"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Posts: 1011
Threads: 57
Joined: December 22, 2009
Reputation:
6
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:05 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2010 at 11:06 pm by ib.me.ub.)
So what do you suppose then, just kill the lot, drop the bomb! If you feel that way about the world, im sure your area has a bridge!!!
Posts: 48
Threads: 1
Joined: October 16, 2010
Reputation:
0
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:07 pm
ib.me.ub Wrote:Allies killed millions of innocent people as well, but in retaliation to German aggression Also retarded. The allies killed millions of people in a war-mongering crusade for democracy. It took America and Britain to make it a world war, they vastly escalated it, carried on a war of aggression neither Japan nor Germany never wanted, propped up a Communist regime.
Your history is stupid bullshit. You know those things they told you in school? Those are called lies.
"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Posts: 1011
Threads: 57
Joined: December 22, 2009
Reputation:
6
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:13 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2010 at 11:14 pm by ib.me.ub.)
Quote:It took America and Britain to make it a world war, they vastly escalated it, carried on a war of aggression neither Japan nor Germany never wanted, propped up a Communist regime.
This is bullshit. So Germany didn't invade sovereign countries. Your history is the stupid bullshit lady.
Posts: 48
Threads: 1
Joined: October 16, 2010
Reputation:
0
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:18 pm
(October 16, 2010 at 11:13 pm)ib.me.ub Wrote: This is bullshit. So Germany didn't invade sovereign countries. What the fuck does that have to do with England declaring war on Germany? England started that shit.
Or FDR provoking the Japanese for years on end?
Since you obviously haven't actually read any real history, I am done talking to you. Have fun with your Democracy is Heaven and FDR was Jesus fantasies, fag.
"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Posts: 1011
Threads: 57
Joined: December 22, 2009
Reputation:
6
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:19 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2010 at 11:23 pm by ib.me.ub.)
lol. Sounds as if you need to go back to high school. Don't think you will be here for long.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:48 pm
Quote:Yeah, but the didn't decide to kill millions of innocent people for no reason.
Oh, Hitler had a reason. You may not think it was a very good reason but then, you weren't on the losing side of the First World War.
Britain and France reacted when Hitler invaded Poland. They sat on their hands through Hitler's earlier moves. Perhaps Hitler merely miscalculated their resolve?
Besides, The British and French (and later the US) made an alliance with Stalin who was an even bigger prick than Hitler.
There is no way to make this simple.
"Simple" is for the bible.
Posts: 48
Threads: 1
Joined: October 16, 2010
Reputation:
0
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 16, 2010 at 11:51 pm
(October 16, 2010 at 11:48 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Oh, Hitler had a reason. You may not think it was a very good reason but then, you weren't on the losing side of the First World War.
Britain and France reacted when Hitler invaded Poland. They sat on their hands through Hitler's earlier moves. Perhaps Hitler merely miscalculated their resolve?
Besides, The British and French (and later the US) made an alliance with Stalin who was an even bigger prick than Hitler.
There is no way to make this simple.
"Simple" is for the bible. I can make it real simple. Kill 'em all.
"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
October 17, 2010 at 12:00 am
You sure you're not religious?
That sounds like the holier-than-thou crowd.
|