|
TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
|
 (November 18, 2015 at 12:22 pm)Vic Wrote: My evil levels are like way down. I don't even kick babies before I eat them or anything. Vive la différence. I prefer my meat tenderised.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
  (November 18, 2015 at 1:00 am)Evie Wrote:(November 17, 2015 at 11:59 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Eg, pussy is my god, I win! Did you mean to spell that with an "l"?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
 RE: TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
November 18, 2015 at 3:16 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2015 at 3:16 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
Huh? the only "i" used what in "mine" I nuh-no what you meanings.
RE: TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
November 18, 2015 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2015 at 3:18 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
Ahahahah I just got the joke.
"let's start a cunt" Haha hnahhaa. I'd rather finish a cunt than start one... well, finish in one. 
I think he means "cult" should be "clit"
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" 
So it appears that I have to first define what God is in order to have a debate on his existence. That's fine. God is easy to define, and I'm not going to change anything from his traditional definition. You won't be surprised, because as I said before, I think we all know what God is, and I think this tactic of demanding a definition is just a typical dodge by atheists. But I will open a new topic so can define God and also lay out other terms for the debate.
(November 18, 2015 at 3:20 pm)TruthisGod Wrote: So it appears that I have to first define what God is in order to have a debate on his existence. That's fine. God is easy to define, and I'm not going to change anything from his traditional definition. You won't be surprised, because as I said before, I think we all know what God is, and I think this tactic of demanding a definition is just a typical dodge by atheists. But I will open a new topic so can define God and also lay out other terms for the debate. No, the claim that we "all know what god is" is actually a doge by theists. To atheists, gods are a fiction. Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" RE: TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
November 18, 2015 at 3:24 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2015 at 3:24 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 18, 2015 at 3:20 pm)TruthisGod Wrote: So it appears that I have to first define what God is in order to have a debate on his existence. That's fine. God is easy to define, and I'm not going to change anything from his traditional definition. You won't be surprised, because as I said before, I think we all know what God is, and I think this tactic of demanding a definition is just a typical dodge by atheists. But I will open a new topic so can define God and also lay out other terms for the debate. We all know what God is? "The supernatural creator of the universe" is the standard definition but how can that be supported if he is indistinguisable from his non-existence and thus it doesn't seem 'He' really 'is' anything at all? In fact, anything supernatural at all seems to be completely indistinguishable from its nonexistence. If it was natural it could be detected at the very least by science. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
