Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 12, 2025, 4:05 am
Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
Universal

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Universal
LadyForCamus Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation: 92
#91
Universal
August 6, 2016 at 8:47 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 8:32 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Enter "deep"ly into it.

[Image: giphy.gif]





Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Find
Reply
LadyForCamus Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation: 92
#92
Universal
August 6, 2016 at 8:49 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 8:29 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Umm...what?  

You refer to the people's respect for you as a person in debate, and you win the debate that way.


When did I do what? And, did I at least do it cohesively?!
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Find
Reply
m0nk3y Offline
the Highway Star
*
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 29
Threads: 2
Joined: August 6, 2016
Reputation: 0
#93
RE: Universal
August 6, 2016 at 8:56 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 8:49 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: You refer to the people's respect for you as a person in debate, and you win the debate that way.


When did I do what?  And, did I at least do it cohesively?!  

"Umm... What?" 

How is this considered an argument? Why is an explanation disregarded? In character, you are pleasuring the people with words, and your argument is a dismissal without an explanation. You proudly exhibit "no", and the people who support you are your only evidence, in theory.

Sort of.
...
The cover art would be the antagonist in cutting-edge black crossing the calm blue face of protagonist in two places, with dual handguns.
...
Find
Reply
Angrboda Offline
Bringer Of Grief
*****
Religious Views: Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi. You’re my only hope.
Posts: 29930
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation: 159
#94
RE: Universal
August 6, 2016 at 8:57 pm
[Image: pyx244.gif]
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Find
Reply
LostLocke Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Polyapathist
Posts: 2009
Threads: 2
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation: 26
#95
RE: Universal
August 6, 2016 at 9:22 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 8:56 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: In character, you are pleasuring the people with words...
Mmmm, yeah, gimme those prepositions baby. Work those adverbs, WORK THEM!! Oooooo
Find
Reply
Homeless Nutter Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: No, thank you.
Posts: 3541
Threads: 0
Joined: January 20, 2015
Reputation: 35
#96
RE: Universal
August 6, 2016 at 9:51 pm (This post was last modified: August 6, 2016 at 9:58 pm by Homeless Nutter.)
(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: The universe and humanity are equal, their only difference is age.

Equal? What does that mean? Sounds like utter nonsense and you provide no explanation, so I'm going to assume it's just bullsh*t.

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
The human mind can comprehend the universe, as humans are a universal species.

What's a "universal species"? What does it mean to "comprehend the universe"? Are you trying to write a poem, or something? Because none of this makes any sense.

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
To think, we need a heartbeat; to survive, we need numerous things.

Uhm... In order to think we need numerous things - a heartbeat is not enough, we need neurons and such. We need "numerous things" for pretty much everything. What's your point?

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
Humanity is an entirety of numerous things, and the universe is an entirety of numerous things.

What's an "entirety of numerous things"? And what has that to do with anything? Your mother is made of numerous things and a dog-sh*t is made of numerous things - are you saying your mother and a dog turd are "equal"?

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
The cohesive human communicates with the entirety of the universe.

Communication is between the cohesive human and the cohesive universe.

Where's your evidence of this "communication with the entirety of the universe"? Again - sounds like bullsh*t...

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
All factors that sum up to the cohesive human communicate.

The heart communicates to the universe, the mind communicates to the universe, and the human communicates to the universe (all other factors included).

What does any of that mean? How does anything "communicate to the universe"?

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
Communication is of the numerous factors that sum up to the cohesive human, who communicates as the product of these numerous factors.

Word salad. I think you're just a dim-witted person, who imagines he's saying something profound, when in fact you're just not making any sense at all. Philosophy is not for everyone - it's not enough to just make a bunch of incoherent assertions using confusing, vacuous language.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Find
Reply
Losty Offline
LastPoet’s jerkoff #4
*****
Religious Views: Pastafarian
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation: 185
#97
RE: Universal
August 6, 2016 at 9:51 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 8:56 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 8:49 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: When did I do what?  And, did I at least do it cohesively?!  

"Umm... What?" 

How is this considered an argument? Why is an explanation disregarded? In character, you are pleasuring the people with words, and your argument is a dismissal without an explanation. You proudly exhibit "no", and the people who support you are your only evidence, in theory.

Sort of.

We genuinely don't know what you're talking about. I see you have still failed to tell me what your overall point was in the op.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Find
Reply
LadyForCamus Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation: 92
#98
Universal
August 6, 2016 at 9:52 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 8:56 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 8:49 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: When did I do what?  And, did I at least do it cohesively?!  

"Umm... What?" 

How is this considered an argument? Why is an explanation disregarded? In character, you are pleasuring the people with words, and your argument is a dismissal without an explanation. You proudly exhibit "no", and the people who support you are your only evidence, in theory.

Sort of.


Yes. The force is with you. All the electrons are humming positivity through my body, but not the physical body; the universal body. You have, sort of, failed to register the deepity as you think it pleases the others to press negative sameness on to me. In theory, the argument forward from your words but not your person, is only one in theory.

Any failure to rebuke my argument above is a clear shot that you are sadly, lost within yourself.

Got it? I mean, how much clearer can I be?! [emoji848]

Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Find
Reply
Ravenshire Offline Donators
Assassin to (and of) kings.
*****
Religious Views: Purloiner of personal property.
Posts: 8290
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation: 54
#99
RE: Universal
August 6, 2016 at 10:08 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 1:01 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: This thread is being derailed, but I'm open to discuss or debate with anyone who behaves sensibly. 
(emphasis is mine)

Boy, have you come to the wrong place. Angel

Concerning the OP:
What the fuck did I just read?!?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Find
Reply
LadyForCamus Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation: 92
#100
RE: Universal
August 6, 2016 at 10:27 pm
(August 6, 2016 at 10:08 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 1:01 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: This thread is being derailed, but I'm open to discuss or debate with anyone who behaves sensibly. 


Concerning the OP:
What the fuck did I just read?!?

*sad sigh*

You're one of us now...
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
Universal



Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)