Ontological Disproof of God

[brewer]

And just when we were about to tell him that the OP had validity. 

Poor neggy.

[Abaddon_ire]

And just when we were about to tell him that the OP had validity. 

Poor neggy.

There is an ontological proof of god's existence.

There is an ontological disproof of god's existence.

Given that, neither has any real utility.

ETA: And neggy plagiarized it anyway. His argument has been kicking around since before he was even born.

[brewer]

And just when we were about to tell him that the OP had validity. 

Poor neggy.

There is an ontological proof of god's existence.

There is an ontological disproof of god's existence.

Given that, neither has any real utility.

ETA: And neggy plagiarized it anyway. His argument has been kicking around since before he was even born.

Shhhhhhhhhhhh, he'll hear. What the hell are you trying to do to him?

[Abaddon_ire]

There is an ontological proof of god's existence.

There is an ontological disproof of god's existence.

Given that, neither has any real utility.

ETA: And neggy plagiarized it anyway. His argument has been kicking around since before he was even born.

Shhhhhhhhhhhh, he'll hear. What the hell are you trying to do to him?

You think neggy listens to anyone but himself? 

[brewer]

Shhhhhhhhhhhh, he'll hear. What the hell are you trying to do to him?

You think neggy listens to anyone but himself? 

I'm pretty sure he's revealing in his banishment by  inferior beings. He's still reading and cursing (in very long unintelligible sentences, lots of commas and repetition).

[LadyForCamus]

It’s gone!!! God bless us, everyone!

[Bob Kelso]

Lol, LadyforTinyTim

[Lucanus]

You think neggy listens to anyone but himself? 

I'm pretty sure he's revealing in his banishment by  inferior beings. He's still reading and cursing (in very long unintelligible sentences, lots of commas and repetition).

You fucking, fuckety-fuck fucker, did you fucking believe Negatio would be fucking gone for good? Negatio pities your naivete, you imbecile, you dim-wit, you poopy ass-brain. Negatio is trained in gorilla philosophy and knows 500 ways to kill you, you brain dead mosquito fart, and that's only with his impregnable logic and syntax. Your fucking accusations of "trolling" have killed Duane, the good, kind, gentle person that he was, but Negatio rose from his ashes and will exact his revenge on you, fucking ass wipe fuckers. You're dead.

Duane

---

This is satire

---

[Abaddon_ire]

You think neggy listens to anyone but himself? 

I'm pretty sure he's revealing in his banishment by  inferior beings. He's still reading and cursing (in very long unintelligible sentences, lots of commas and repetition).

It is difficult to figure out. He seemed to think that basic netiquette required him to change his argument. In the real world, it was all about presentation.

If one cannot cogently present one's argument, why should anyone give the word salad any time.

Add to that, we are all mostly atheists already here. The ontoligical crap fest is simply a fifth wheel. It wont convince any atheists because we are already there, and it wont convince any theists either, because that wordy baloney only works in one direction for them. 

So, WTF?

[Angrboda]

Actually, I would be curious to see the argument in more capable hands, if you have an example of it being pitched by someone else.

I never did get full answers on either the conflict between Sartre's existentialism and other models of freedom, nor how a double nihilation contradicted theological assumptions.

Ultimately, Khem is right, God did know people wouldn't keep the law, and he made that clear many times. So the fundamental contradiction, that an omniscient God would know that the law is ineffectual for regulating behavior and the charge that the Christian God did not know that the law would be ineffectual for regulating behavior does not exist. He did know.