Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 2, 2025, 2:24 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Truce
#51
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:11 pm)Insanity x Wrote: R.I.P Werewolff

I really like this version too, Insanityman. Do you know it?




[/quote]

Reply
#52
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:26 pm)whateverist Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 8:11 pm)Insanity x Wrote: R.I.P Werewolff

I really like this version too, Insanityman. Do you know it?

Seen the film a couple times but can't say I am familiar with it. Tongue
Reply
#53
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:25 pm)Tiberius Wrote: He was a known spammer / sock account of someone else we banned ages ago.

My spidey sense was right then.

You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.

Reply
#54
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:07 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: He was also listed as a problem based on his ISP. It wasn't just him being a douche.

Huh? Do you mean IP or are there really some ISPs (besides AOL) that are well known troll producers?
(March 11, 2012 at 8:14 pm)Shell B Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 8:05 pm)NoMoreFaith Wrote: Well, there just means he's not very good at arguing his point. Doesn't seem to be worth banning.

Simply through starting threads and refusing to argue his point beyond "We should be sweet and lovely to the theists"... still, seems harsh tis all.

I didn't actually ban him, but he was banned. He had it coming.

Damn, my money was on you.
Reply
#55
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:33 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 8:25 pm)Tiberius Wrote: He was a known spammer / sock account of someone else we banned ages ago.

My spidey sense was right then.

Yes. After your explosion, I took up an interest in figuring out who Werewolff was, because I felt like I had seen his post style before.

(March 11, 2012 at 8:34 pm)Phil Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 8:14 pm)Shell B Wrote: I didn't actually ban him, but he was banned. He had it coming.

Damn, my money was on you.

I got him first, but there were some concerns I blew him away too quickly, so Tiberius conducted a detailed investigation.

I am glad to see my suspicions were correct.

Thank you Tiberius.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#56
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:33 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 8:25 pm)Tiberius Wrote: He was a known spammer / sock account of someone else we banned ages ago.

My spidey sense was right then.
Still, in future don't engage suspected trolls. Just report them.
Reply
#57
RE: Truce
What not even a little bit?
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.

Reply
#58
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:34 pm)Phil Wrote: Damn, my money was on you.

I don't really ban that often.
Reply
#59
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:51 pm)Shell B Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 8:34 pm)Phil Wrote: Damn, my money was on you.

I don't really ban that often.

And here I thought you were a good dominatrix.
Reply
#60
RE: Truce
(March 11, 2012 at 8:53 pm)Phil Wrote: And here I thought you were a good dominatrix.

Haha, no, I'm terrible.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)