Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 25, 2024, 9:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Intelligent' design?
#51
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 11:00 pm)black36 Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 10:57 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Oh yeah, absolutely, lets start with those. So, this design then?

If not, how did they appear, work together perfectly, and how did the organisms know how to use them properly?

Fffuuuuuuck!!!

They didnt!!!

It was gradual that's the whole fucking point?!?:!
Reply
#52
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 10:59 pm)Insanity x Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 10:49 pm)black36 Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 10:45 pm)Insanity x Wrote: I was actually talking about your post.. but sure ill bite.

The lack of any reasonable evidence.

Evolution - Vast fossil records and variation in billions of species around the world
ID - We think god did it.

Variation proves........ ?

You are like a child..

Okay you start with a hypothesis. You then begin to gather the evidence. Fossil records show a gradual process where by species change over time. You also have modern species with the same ancestry as those fossils which have millions of varying traits and species and we see the ones that suit their environment live to reproduce and passing the positive traits on. So we can see how it has worked up till now.

With the observations and evidence scientists are able to say that it is a theory because it is supported by overwhelming evidence.

Meanwhile ID you say "Look.. Stuff is here therefore god did it!"

If stuff wasn't here we wouldn't be around to have the fucking conversation!

There is no evidence for ID so its a Hypothesis aka an idea. And as with all ideas unless you give a good reason why your idea is right you should be ignored.

There's no evidence of any kind. It's a consensus view of like minded individuals. Just as one party can look at a bone and say, "Wow, look what evolved!",another can say, "Wow, look what God made."
(March 11, 2012 at 11:03 pm)Insanity x Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 11:00 pm)black36 Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 10:57 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Oh yeah, absolutely, lets start with those. So, this design then?

If not, how did they appear, work together perfectly, and how did the organisms know how to use them properly?

Fffuuuuuuck!!!

They didnt!!!

It was gradual that's the whole fucking point?!?:!
Gradual? You mean they reproduced prior to having reproductive organs? You're funny.
Reply
#53
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 11:10 pm)black36 Wrote: Gradual? You mean they reproduced prior to having reproductive organs? You're funny.

Wow. Your lack of knowledge is astonishing.
Cunt
Reply
#54
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 11:10 pm)black36 Wrote: There's no evidence of any kind. It's a consensus view of like minded individuals. Just as one party can look at a bone and say, "Wow, look what evolved!",another can say, "Wow, look what God made."

You my friend are either beautifully stupid or willfully ignorant. We have a clear line of succession and a strong argument for evolution based on fossils and remains for most species all the way up to modern ancestry. That is evidence.

To refute it is pure ignorance.

Give me one good reasonable piece of evidence for ID.
(March 11, 2012 at 11:10 pm)black36 Wrote: Gradual? You mean they reproduced prior to having reproductive organs? You're funny.

You imply everything requires reproductive organs?

[Image: paramecium3.jpg]

I see no penis.. maybe its a girl one
Reply
#55
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 11:17 pm)Insanity x Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 11:10 pm)black36 Wrote: There's no evidence of any kind. It's a consensus view of like minded individuals. Just as one party can look at a bone and say, "Wow, look what evolved!",another can say, "Wow, look what God made."

You my friend are either beautifully stupid or willfully ignorant. We have a clear line of succession and a strong argument for evolution based on fossils and remains for most species all the way up to modern ancestry. That is evidence.

To refute it is pure ignorance.

Give me one good reasonable piece of evidence for ID.
(March 11, 2012 at 11:10 pm)black36 Wrote: Gradual? You mean they reproduced prior to having reproductive organs? You're funny.

You imply everything requires reproductive organs?

[Image: paramecium3.jpg]

I see no penis.. maybe its a girl one

So, you want me to believe that opposing reproductive organs magically appeared, which work together perfectly, in the same place, at the same time, in distinctly different organisms, who suddenly had the desire and the know how as to how to use said organs, then they were successfully used, survived and continued to survive, despite there being no environmental factor which would cause such phenomena, nor mutation which is even mathematically possible to produce opposing organs which work perfectly????????

ROFLOL
Reply
#56
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 11:28 pm)black36 Wrote: So, you want me to believe that opposing reproductive organs magically appeared, which work together perfectly, in the same place, at the same time, in distinctly different organisms, who suddenly had the desire and the know how as to how to use said organs, then they were successfully used, survived and continued to survive, despite there being no environmental factor which would cause such phenomena, nor mutation which is even mathematically possible to produce opposing organs which work perfectly????????

ROFLOL

I think the winner is willfully ignorant. I'm sorry that you have lost full use of this life in the pursuit of a purpose that isn't there.

You have completely disregard me saying how gradual these changes are. Things don't just sprout an organ. some cells reproduce once every 20 mins. That means every 20 mins they double in number. Each time they change slightly. Now imagine leaving these cells for over the lifespan of the earth. Is it really that hard to believe that they wont become more complex. They inadvertently test every possibility as they go through this process.

I find the idea that god did it pathetic in comparison to this process.

Anyway I'm off to bed. Someone else can waste their time with you. You are completely closed minded and incapable of having a reasonable dialogue with.

You demand answers from us we give them to you and you refuse them without any decent grounds for doing so. You should be embarrassed. Not once have you provided evidence for ID.
Reply
#57
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Quote:Gradual? You mean they reproduced prior to having reproductive organs? You're funny.


This one is dumb as a bag of rocks.

You know what, Black. Stick with your fucking bible. It's all you can handle.

Leave the heavy thinking to others.
Reply
#58
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 11:28 pm)black36 Wrote: So, you want me to believe that opposing reproductive organs magically appeared, which work together perfectly, in the same place, at the same time, in distinctly different organisms, who suddenly had the desire and the know how as to how to use said organs, then they were successfully used, survived and continued to survive, despite there being no environmental factor which would cause such phenomena, nor mutation which is even mathematically possible to produce opposing organs which work perfectly????????

ROFLOL

So therefore Jesus?

Would it be equally acceptable to you if I suggested that since I was unaware of WHY the tides went in and went out, that therefore sea spirits exist to move them?
Reply
#59
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Have you seen how cellphones nowadays can make photos and videos? It's miraculous! Must be a sign of God. He's good with chips.
Reply
#60
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Quote:Would it be equally acceptable to you if I suggested that since I was unaware of WHY the tides went in and went out, that therefore sea spirits exist to move them?


Ha, Rev. He'll tell you there are no sea "spirits." Of course it is fucking "jesus" who moves the tides and he will see no irony in that answer!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Falling Dundee 9 1822 October 5, 2020 at 1:41 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 7314 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Intelligent Design (brief overview). Mystic 70 15428 May 9, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 4770 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 51133 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 10287 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... Brian37 23 6617 March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Intelligent Design, The Designer is Drunk! Mental Outlaw 6 2398 March 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Disbelief in an intelligent creator = far fetched? Silver 39 9199 January 12, 2015 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Nope
  Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless robvalue 27 7061 September 13, 2014 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: fr0d0



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)