Atheist demotivational pics

[Edwardo Piet]

Well! I admire your humility. I didn't expect you to condede a viewpoint so elegantly.

It's no problem whatsoever of course, it's a very common thing to be impulsive, and I kind of suspected it to be more of a knee-jerk reaction anyway.

Oh by the way...what's RtDC? I've never heard of that

EvF

[Violet]

Maybe i embrace new viewpoints elegantly.... but i can't do the same for compliments. I take insults in stride... but compliments are harder...

Anyway, RtDc: Refusal to discuss complex. Like what Fr0do has when you ask him pretty much anything.

[Edwardo Piet]

Ahahha! And he accused me of it on the other thread....

And I think "Umm, fr0d0.. one of.the reasons why I've got so many fucking posts is that I'll never fucking drop a subject as you well know!" - I was inquring as to how is a discussion if he's just going to assert stuff and not actually discuss properly. I'm always happy to discuss here!

I myself like compliments...but I like practically never believe them!

And insults never bother me anymore, and have certaintly never remotely even bothered me once online for nearly 6 years now anyway.

EvF

[fr0d0]

Anyway, RtDc: Refusal to discuss complex. Like what Fr0do has when you ask him pretty much anything.

Show me where I refused to discuss anything with you Saerules

[Violet]

How about those 500+ contradictions, Fr0do? That's a good start.

[fr0d0]

And I think "Umm, fr0d0.. one of.the reasons why I've got so many fucking posts is that I'll never fucking drop a subject as you well know!" - I was inquring as to how is a discussion if he's just going to assert stuff and not actually discuss properly. I'm always happy to discuss here!

But you refuse to discuss choice and evidence. You make a bare assertion of evidence in the face of what must be 100 various explanations to the contrary, but not once do you ever consider it.

Your ambition to be the person to post the most times on the internet "where's the evidence" demonstrates exactly how rooted you are in that. It doesn't matter what logic presents itself, you would rather not look like a fool who has to go back on his word, so you have to stick to this point. There is no rationale there. Discussion requires rationale.

---

How about those 500+ contradictions, Fr0do? That's a good start.

So none then.

How ridiculous you are. I already responded to that - go look in a commentary and report back to me ANY of those contradictions that hold water. Those I'll be interested in. Your question has been answered successfully countless times already.

[Rhizomorph13]

...Your question has been answered successfully countless times already.

Therefore, Fr0d0 refuses to discuss it with you!

There ya go, I finished your part for you.

Other people would defend there worldview by presenting evidence, like, oh, a link or something crazy like that.

Rhizo

[fr0d0]

LMAO

I did give detailed instructions in the other thread. But if itz linkz ya wantz... here's a few to get ya started

[Edwardo Piet]

But you refuse to discuss choice and evidence. You make a bare assertion of evidence in the face of what must be 100 various explanations to the contrary, but not once do you ever consider it.

I consider without accepting. If your side of the argument has no evidence then I'm not going to just accept it! That's pretty much the definiton of irrationality! To willing accepted a belief without support is to accept a false belief, a delusion. Beliefs without evidence are beliefs without support. By definition, evidence is valid support for a belief.

There is no rationale there. Discussion requires rationale.

Indeed discussion does require rationale. And how exactly are we 'discussing' if you won't support your position? Well you say it has support but no evidence...and I see that as a contradiction.

So anyway, all this questioning of mine amounted to me basically wanting to know how we can discuss without you evidencing your postion, and you responded by saying that I should think it through, that I should 'watch from a distance': But how do I do that and it still be a discussion? This is a genuine question, not rhetorical - please respond to it.

EvF

[fr0d0]

"please respond to it"
Ha! I did!

Belief without evidence = science floored. Science wanders the corridor in a huff wondering what it's popularity really bought it - for all the great stuff it achieved it still couldn't bloody answer these easy questions. 'FUK' it said to itself.