Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 5:41 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Irreducible Complexity.
#91
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
Can you guys please *stop* being all friendly and sociable? I feel the bile rising in my throat and feel I can't....can't stop.... blllllarrrrrrrrrrrghhh!

*wipes vomit from mouth*

Now get back to arguing with each other, setting up straw men, using flawed logic and general rioting.

Thankyou :p

(November 17, 2008 at 4:28 pm)CoxRox Wrote: So, here is what the evolutionists are proposing for a superior breathing apparatus. Our trachea would continue up to our nose, requiring our necks to be at least 1 inch wider. We would have huge noses with nose lips and a tongue protruding out. Of course, our faces would have to be much longer to accommodate the additional structures. Now, we would really be ugly! On second thought, it might be interesting trying to kiss with two sets of lips - nah, constantly expelling liquid out our nose would make it kind of gross. Aren't you glad you weren't designed by an evolutionist!'

http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/d...nebad.html

Why am I thinking of Mick Jagger?
Atheism as a Religion
-------------------
A man also or woman that hath a Macintosh, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with used and abandoned Windows 3.1 floppy disks: their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20:27
Reply
#92
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
(November 19, 2008 at 7:07 pm)Jason Jarred Wrote: Can you guys please *stop* being all friendly and sociable?
We wouldn't normally be this friendly and sociable, but I think we've actually met a person who is open minded about learning about Evolution, and has just been tricked by a number of creation scientists through no fault of her own. It's always great to have a chance to set the record straight, especially when the person is willing to do so Big Grin
Reply
#93
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
Hi Guys, I've just finished reading the second chapter of The Blind Watchmaker. I thought I'd not understood a point Dawkin's was making so have just spent about twenty minutes typing up a post for you to help me with. As I read back my own 'thoughts' on this I saw for myself that I'd misunderstood him and what I'd typed was a load of s***e. I'm glad I realised before I posted it. I'm enjoying it so far. I'm hoping to get hold of "Evolution" by Donald R. Prothero in the near future. Smile
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility"

Albert Einstein
Reply
#94
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
I'm glad you are actually taking these things seriously. You're officially my favourite theist Smile
Reply
#95
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
My favourite theist is the Rev Lionel Fanthorpe but CoxRox is a close second Smile
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#96
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
Thank you kind sirs........Blush
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility"

Albert Einstein
Reply
#97
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
CoxRox, even if you don't change your opinion about anything, you rock for having an open mind. Way to go!
Reply
#98
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
Here is an interesting thing. I was at my daughter's yesterday and mentioned how my reading was going on etc. She said a telling thing. She said she'd been listening to Dawkins and was rather worried to carry on listening in case he persuaded her to not believe in God. She is very sensible and knows that the truth is important so I will discuss my findings with her as I go along. I too feel this concern but the truth must out........
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility"

Albert Einstein
Reply
#99
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
Very interesting. I wonder how often this same fear keeps people from searching for their own answers?
Reply
RE: Irreducible Complexity.
(November 23, 2008 at 7:48 am)CoxRox Wrote: Here is an interesting thing. I was at my daughter's yesterday and mentioned how my reading was going on etc. She said a telling thing. She said she'd been listening to Dawkins and was rather worried to carry on listening in case he persuaded her to not believe in God. She is very sensible and knows that the truth is important so I will discuss my findings with her as I go along. I too feel this concern but the truth must out........
Well hopefully she'll continue to listen to Dawkins and realise that being persuaded to not believe in God isn't a bad thing. It's not Dawkins doing the persuading, it's her own mind working it all out.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The "Complexity of the Eye", for stupid creationists. Gawdzilla Sama 10 2226 December 8, 2017 at 3:41 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  The Missing Link and the Irreducible Complexity of the Eye Rhondazvous 73 25352 June 8, 2017 at 6:57 am
Last Post: Amarok
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 14230 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Complexity & Evolution... allan175 13 7407 May 9, 2009 at 4:46 am
Last Post: Giff



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)