Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 4, 2024, 9:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Introducing Illumination
#71
RE: Introducing Illumination
(August 4, 2013 at 12:27 pm)The Meritocrat Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 12:23 pm)The Meritocrat Wrote: I am not going to waste more time here, so this will be my last reply.

I left a link for those interested in hyperrationality and who are curious about the true identity of the Illuminati.

That is all i can do, there is no way i can explain highly complex material to a bunch of people suffering from logophobia (most here didn't even read the introduction).

Here is the link again. I am done with this thread.

Goodbye.

EDIT: I double-posted, for some reason.

Thanks for clarifying...for once.
Reply
#72
RE: Introducing Illumination
Anyone else take a look at that link?

Talk about a shining example of tl;dr.....
Reply
#73
RE: Introducing Illumination
I think most of us were interested in what particular branch of math lies the explanation for reincarnation. As he never justified his reasons with empirical evidence, we can safely say his findings were as founded as PeterPriesthood's.
[Image: 10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg]
Reply
#74
RE: Introducing Illumination
(August 3, 2013 at 11:19 pm)The Meritocrat Wrote: How ironic.

What a delightful logic yours is. Do i really need to introduce myself so you can take me seriously? Why? What's gonna change if you "know" me? We're on the Internet, i can lie and get away with it, so what will the difference be?

An introduction demonstrates that you are intrerested in actually participating and furthering thoughtful discussion. Otherwise, you just look like a shit and runner that is hear to poop out his latest mental diarrhea, wasting everyone's time as countless others before you have.

(August 3, 2013 at 11:19 pm)The Meritocrat Wrote: What a poor reason to feed your ego.

Ah, yes, my ego grows exponentially every time I refuse to read a lengthy post. It feeds off the inability of others to condense their ideas into a reader-friendly format.

But seriously, don't project your failures on me.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#75
RE: Introducing Illumination
Can you prove the reincarnation mathematically ? How can you prove this with the mathematics ? so then that mathematics don't explore the metaphysical domain because the mathematics are a science.
Reply
#76
RE: Introducing Illumination
(August 4, 2013 at 12:29 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: His own destructive, evil god

A friend of your god then.
Reply
#77
RE: Introducing Illumination
Hm. The key to getting people to ask questions is to post something interesting. You don't need illumination to know that, but you do need to be in the dark to be mystified by dullness generating disinterest.
Reply
#78
RE: Introducing Illumination
(August 4, 2013 at 10:46 am)The Meritocrat Wrote: What the fuck!! Didn't i say the purpose of my thread was to get you to ask questions? Where are they? This was just an introduction. Do you really expect me to write it all down here? Most people won't even read the OP, let alone what is to come.

Reincarnation is not a faith-based belief, unless Philosophy is now a religion. Like i said, ask anything at all instead of ignorantly criticizing me.

You're cute when you get all flustered because you have such exacting expectations for behaviors no one owes you.

(August 4, 2013 at 11:55 am)The Meritocrat Wrote: Isn't it obvious? People are still complaining that my "beliefs" are irrational without even asking for details.

Buddhism does not explain Reincarnation mathematically.

Well your beliefs are at least on par with Buddhism in this regard.
Reply
#79
RE: Introducing Illumination
(August 6, 2013 at 4:53 pm)HalcyonicTrust Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 12:29 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: His own destructive, evil god

A friend of your god then.

Yawn

what?!
Reply
#80
RE: Introducing Illumination
Just flipped through that link. What a dweeb. Now I've seen everything. An imbecile with a god complex.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 23 Guest(s)