Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 13, 2025, 12:34 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Marriage equality: Texas
#61
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
Quote:I object to homosexuality because it is a disgusting sex act. Not because some book says it's bad, but because penis into a butt-hole is gross.

Then you probably should not do it.

I don't see why your prejudices should be codified into law, though.
Reply
#62
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
(February 28, 2014 at 6:36 pm)futilethewinds Wrote:
(February 28, 2014 at 6:28 pm)paintpooper Wrote: It does not to have to be a religious thing.

I object to homosexuality because it is a disgusting sex act. Not because some book says it's bad, but because penis into a butt-hole is gross. And yes that is exactly what male homosexuality is all about, sodomy. Sure I can love my guy friends as good friends but doesn't mean I have to express that love with sodomy, that is perverse.

If I don't want to take pictures of two butt lovers as a marriage photographer that is my choice of running my business and should not be able to be sued for disagreeing with a perverted lifestyle.
(A) Heterosexual couples engage in anal sex all the time. If you knew which couples did so, would you refuse to be their photographer as well?
(B) You're flat-out wrong that male homosexuality is all about anal sex. In his latest documentary, Stephen Fry (an out gay man) tells a homophobe like you that he has never engaged in anal sex.
(C ) You have no logical reason for saying that anal sex is "perverse," it is based purely on your own prejudice. It's the same as the claim that African-Americans are less intelligent than Caucasians.

A. As I still find that perverse, at least it is still with the correct sex.

B. Fine I have no problem with homosexuals who do not engage in sodomy. so what 99.9 percent of them do though I assume.

C. Negros are in fact less intelligent in an IQ type of intelligence measuring system, compared to whites.

Having poop on your dick is persevere, poop makes you vomit, poop is the bodies diseased waste.

(February 28, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:I object to homosexuality because it is a disgusting sex act. Not because some book says it's bad, but because penis into a butt-hole is gross.

Then you probably should not do it.

I don't see why your prejudices should be codified into law, though.

I don't think it needs to be a law, but I don't think that people can be sued for not offering services to a homosexual couple. Isn't that is what is happening?
Reply
#63
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
(February 28, 2014 at 6:43 pm)paintpooper Wrote: A. As I still find that perverse, at least it is still with the correct sex.

B. Fine I have no problem with homosexuals who do not engage in sodomy. so what 99.9 percent of them do though I assume.

C. Negros are in fact less intelligent in an IQ type of intelligence measuring system, compared to whites.

Having poop on your dick is persevere, poop makes you vomit, poop is the bodies diseased waste.
(A) What makes you qualified to say what the "correct" sex is? I think heterosexuality is an abomination. Should there be a law that allows me to actively discriminate against heterosexuals?
(B) You clearly have no idea how many homosexuals do or do not engage in anal sex, so you have no reason to assume that when you encounter one on the street, they are someone who has engaged in that act.
(C ) "Negros"? ROFLOL Are you from the 1920s? That might explain a few things. And IQ tests are skewed to favor whites.
(D) You clearly do not know anything about anal sex. It is perfectly hygienic and does not get "poop on your dick." By saying so, you are just letting the world know what a complete moron you are.

(February 28, 2014 at 6:43 pm)paintpooper Wrote: I don't think it needs to be a law, but I don't think that people can be sued for not offering services to a homosexual couple. Isn't that is what is happening?
Nope. What is happening is that a law almost went on the books that made it legal for businesses to deny service to anyone based on their religious beliefs.
Reply
#64
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
Dafuq is this moronic cuntrag talking about?
Reply
#65
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
(February 28, 2014 at 6:48 pm)futilethewinds Wrote:
(February 28, 2014 at 6:43 pm)paintpooper Wrote: A. As I still find that perverse, at least it is still with the correct sex.

B. Fine I have no problem with homosexuals who do not engage in sodomy. so what 99.9 percent of them do though I assume.

C. Negros are in fact less intelligent in an IQ type of intelligence measuring system, compared to whites.

Having poop on your dick is persevere, poop makes you vomit, poop is the bodies diseased waste.
(A) What makes you qualified to say what the "correct" sex is? I think heterosexuality is an abomination. Should there be a law that allows me to actively discriminate against heterosexuals?
(B) You clearly have no idea how many homosexuals do or do not engage in anal sex, so you have no reason to assume that when you encounter one on the street, they are someone who has engaged in that act.
(C ) "Negros"? ROFLOL Are you from the 1920s? That might explain a few things. And IQ tests are skewed to favor whites.
(D) You clearly do not know anything about anal sex. It is perfectly hygienic and does not get "poop on your dick." By saying so, you are just letting the world know what a complete moron you are.

(February 28, 2014 at 6:43 pm)paintpooper Wrote: I don't think it needs to be a law, but I don't think that people can be sued for not offering services to a homosexual couple. Isn't that is what is happening?
Nope. What is happening is that a law almost went on the books that made it legal for businesses to deny service to anyone based on their religious beliefs.

Natural law of nature says heterosexuality is the "normal". Society agrees.
Hetero sex is how a species procreates without it you and I would no exist. If everyone were homo the earth would still be a rock with no life.

OK well currently the law says you can't deny someone because of homosexuality but it is the RIGHT as a business owner to refuse service to anyone you want.

An African American is not correct, They are Negros, or Negroid race.
African American is PC bullshit.

I can't argue with someone who thinks putting objects into a waste exit zone is clean. Explain AIDS epidemic and hepatitis in homosexuals.
Reply
#66
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
I wonder if the various tax benefits, court protections, etc that go along with government sanctioned marriage will ever be extended to people who choose to remain single? How come I'm illegible because I don't want to have children or spend my whole life with one person?
[Image: dcep7c.jpg]
Reply
#67
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
(February 28, 2014 at 6:55 pm)paintpooper Wrote: Natural law of nature says heterosexuality is the "normal". Society agrees.
Hetero sex is how a species procreates without it you and I would no exist. If everyone were homo the earth would still be a rock with no life.

OK well currently the law says you can't deny someone because of homosexuality but it is the RIGHT as a business owner to refuse service to anyone you want.

An African American is not correct, They are Negros, or Negroid race.
African American is PC bullshit.

I can't argue with someone who thinks putting objects into a waste exit zone is clean. Explain AIDS epidemic and hepatitis in homosexuals.
"Natural law of nature?" Redundancy is redundant. Also, you are wrong. Homosexuality has been observed in thousands of species. Nature is cool with it.

You are also wrong about procreation. Heterosexuality is not the only means we have to procreate. Do you even science?

The correct term for a group is the term they prefer. For example, "Inuits" instead of "Eskimos" and "Native Americans" instead of "Indians."

I don't have to explain that because heterosexuals also get AIDS and hepatitis, from both anal and penis-in-vagina sex, by the way. Plus, there are these things you might have heard about called "condoms". There is even a pill that can be taken daily to reduce the chance of AIDS/HIV infection to .1%. How exactly is homosexual anal sex supposed to be inherently worse for one's health?

(February 28, 2014 at 6:59 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I wonder if the various tax benefits, court protections, etc that go along with government sanctioned marriage will ever be extended to people who choose to remain single? How come I'm illegible because I don't want to have children or spend my whole life with one person?
Um, no, because if you are single and childless, you don't have anyone dependent on you financially. It's not discrimination, it's logic.
Reply
#68
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
(February 28, 2014 at 7:03 pm)futilethewinds Wrote:
(February 28, 2014 at 6:55 pm)paintpooper Wrote: Natural law of nature says heterosexuality is the "normal". Society agrees.
Hetero sex is how a species procreates without it you and I would no exist. If everyone were homo the earth would still be a rock with no life.

OK well currently the law says you can't deny someone because of homosexuality but it is the RIGHT as a business owner to refuse service to anyone you want.

An African American is not correct, They are Negros, or Negroid race.
African American is PC bullshit.

I can't argue with someone who thinks putting objects into a waste exit zone is clean. Explain AIDS epidemic and hepatitis in homosexuals.
"Natural law of nature?" Redundancy is redundant. Also, you are wrong. Homosexuality has been observed in thousands of species. Nature is cool with it.

You are also wrong about procreation. Heterosexuality is not the only means we have to procreate. Do you even science?

The correct term for a group is the term they prefer. For example, "Inuits" instead of "Eskimos" and "Native Americans" instead of "Indians."

I don't have to explain that because heterosexuals also get AIDS and hepatitis, from both anal and penis-in-vagina sex, by the way. Plus, there are these things you might have heard about called "condoms". There is even a pill that can be taken daily to reduce the chance of AIDS/HIV infection to .1%. How exactly is homosexual anal sex supposed to be inherently worse for one's health?

(February 28, 2014 at 6:59 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I wonder if the various tax benefits, court protections, etc that go along with government sanctioned marriage will ever be extended to people who choose to remain single? How come I'm illegible because I don't want to have children or spend my whole life with one person?
Um, no, because if you are single and childless, you don't have anyone dependent on you financially. It's not discrimination, it's logic.

Do I science? Test tube babies from sperm banks and embryo banks is not procreation. Then being raised by 2 men or 2 women, that world would not last long at all.

AIDS info. http://www.alternet.org/activism/shockin...king-about

Homosexuality sure can happen in nature, doesn't mean it is right. Dogs eat poop. Some species kill the smallest of their young. Some females kill and eat the man after sex. That does not mean humans need to emulate the lower animals.

A race of people is a race of people. Does not matter where they currently live, An African American is a Negro, of the Negroid race.
Reply
#69
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
(February 28, 2014 at 7:03 pm)futilethewinds Wrote: Um, no, because if you are single and childless, you don't have anyone dependent on you financially. It's not discrimination, it's logic.

What married couples without children, or the court protections that are involved about not having to testify against ones spouse? Why does the government encourage marriage at all, gay or straight. Why is the issue about children? We don't need any more people in the world.
[Image: dcep7c.jpg]
Reply
#70
RE: Marriage equality: Texas
(February 28, 2014 at 7:10 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: What married couples without children, or the court protections that are involved about not having to testify against ones spouse? Why does the government encourage marriage at all, gay or straight.
I'm not just talking about children. I'm talking about spouses, too. When you someone else's well-being is dependent on your actions, it gives you motivation to do things like provide for them financially.

I don't know what the logic behind the not having to testify against one's spouse is.

(February 28, 2014 at 7:10 pm)paintpooper Wrote: Do I science? Test tube babies from sperm banks and embryo banks is not procreation. Then being raised by 2 men or 2 women, that world would not last long at all.

AIDS info. http://www.alternet.org/activism/shockin...king-about

Homosexuality sure can happen in nature, doesn't mean it is right. Dogs eat poop. Some species kill the smallest of their young. Some females kill and eat the man after sex. That does not mean humans need to emulate the lower animals.

A race of people is a race of people. Does not matter where they currently live, An African American is a Negro, of the Negroid race.
Okay, but it is still reproduction and serves the same purpose. Studies show that children raised by gay couples are typically better-adjusted than the ones raised by one man and one woman, so what the hell is your problem with it?

But you still haven't given a single reason to believe that it is wrong. And homosexuality also occurs in dolphins, who may be about equally intelligent to humans, so I would hardly call them a lower animal.

ROFLOL Right, "alternet" is definitely a reliable source of information on HIV/AIDS.

The term people are using in this century is "African," not Negroid. FYI, we also don't use the term "Mongoloid" anymore, in case you were wondering.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why don't Southern states outlaw interracial marriage? Jehanne 12 1501 July 26, 2022 at 7:55 am
Last Post: h4ym4n
  Texas Law could circumvent Roe V. Wade Cecelia 55 5985 September 29, 2021 at 3:50 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Transgenderism versus Interracial Marriage. Jehanne 3 762 April 18, 2021 at 1:09 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Russia's Putin wants traditional marriage and God in constitution zebo-the-fat 17 2179 March 4, 2020 at 7:44 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Elizabeth Warren On Marriage Equality BrianSoddingBoru4 8 1810 October 15, 2019 at 11:47 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Voting Machines Switching Votes in Texas ReptilianPeon 5 1095 October 31, 2018 at 8:24 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Hmmm, so this is a tough one. Equality or Equity? ErGingerbreadMandude 14 3149 January 5, 2017 at 10:27 am
Last Post: John V
  Oh Texas! Thump, how do you bear it? Whateverist 15 2055 August 24, 2016 at 10:56 am
Last Post: mlmooney89
  Texas looks to follow UK's example T.J. 173 19337 June 28, 2016 at 1:37 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Texas Judge orders wedding? Spooky 18 4990 August 11, 2015 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: vorlon13



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)