|
Marriage equality: Texas
|
 RE: Marriage equality: Texas
February 28, 2014 at 7:58 pm
(This post was last modified: February 28, 2014 at 7:59 pm by Crossless2.0.)
(February 28, 2014 at 6:40 pm)paintpooper Wrote:(February 28, 2014 at 6:32 pm)truthBtold Wrote: Im straight. . My question to u is would u have anal with a woman??? My guess is that involved two people who didn't take sensible precautions. Condoms, enemas and showers can be your friends. 
I'm pretty sure we have enough people that we don't have to worry about keeping the species alive, even if people that actually made babies were in the minority. I mean if you want to be against it, fine. I just can't see a good reason for it. "It's icky" is not a good reason beyond whether or not you do it in your personal life.
Poe's Law: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing."
10 Christ-like figures that predate Jesus. Link shortened to Chris ate Jesus for some reason... http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-chris...ate-jesus/ Good video to watch, if you want to know how common the Jesus story really is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88GTUXvp-50 A list of biblical contradictions from the infallible word of Yahweh. http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_m...tions.html  (February 28, 2014 at 8:05 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I'm pretty sure we have enough people that we don't have to worry about keeping the species alive, even if people that actually made babies were in the minority. I mean if you want to be against it, fine. I just can't see a good reason for it. "It's icky" is not a good reason beyond whether or not you do it in your personal life. The population being large is only important as long as our tech is even close to being on the same level as other peoples. Do I have memories of bulrathi and sakkra throwing their people at other empires in a desperate attempt to take them down? Why yes... yes I do. Hard to properly blitz with them in a huge galaxy, though. Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
 (February 28, 2014 at 6:40 pm)paintpooper Wrote:(February 28, 2014 at 6:32 pm)truthBtold Wrote: Im straight. . My question to u is would u have anal with a woman??? At least you're consistant. But it brings up questions about lesbians or gay men who don't have anal sex (and I've known quite a few who don't). Do they suddenly become more acceptable? I'll tell ya' what this reminds me of is these gay guys who, upon thinking about sex with a woman are all "Ew! Vagina! That's gross!" And I guess I can excuse them for having their own preferences, but I don't start calling them jerks until they start projecting those personal feelings onto others. So, am I ok with people in Arizona being able to deny services to people just for being gay? Well, first off, didn't a lot of places in the South have policies like that back prior to the 60's? They didn't serve black people? How well did that work out for them? Anyway, I'm not really comfortable with it, but as long as I can deny services to people because they're straight, I guess I can't complain too much. And Arizona has a large Mormon population, many of them are the kinds of fringe, extreme Mormons that Utah rejected, so I kinda suspect they have a lot of power. I think those people are afraid of this bill because they can easily see it being used to deny services to Mormons (who are still a fringe church according to mainstream Christianity) or polygamists (many of which are in Arizona Mormon groups).
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama  Quote:I don't think it needs to be a law, but I don't think that people can be sued for not offering services to a homosexual couple. Isn't that is what is happening? It's called discrimination. And no, none of the supporters could cite a single instance of it happening in Arizona. Time to realize that this was nothing more than a sop thrown to the jesus freak base of one particular party.  RE: Marriage equality: Texas
March 1, 2014 at 3:12 pm
(This post was last modified: March 1, 2014 at 3:13 pm by Autumnlicious.)
(February 27, 2014 at 12:56 am)Minimalist Wrote: I was out for about 4 hours today. I hear you on that. I dual-boot linux and windows. When Linux updates, I don't worry - it's already done in a few seconds. Every time windows updates though, I seriously start to worry. And don't get me started about graphics driver upgrades – ugh. Pain. Every time. A top of the line solid-state drive and it is still dog slow. That shouldn't even be possible. I'd upgrade to Windows 8... if I was retarded. Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Somehow it managed to wipe out or corrupt the drivers for my keyboard and USB controller.
And now, Arizona.
They will shit a brick here if this is struck down. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/1...L920140313 Quote:Arizona same-sex couples sue state over gay marriage ban  RE: Marriage equality: Texas
March 14, 2014 at 6:27 pm
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2014 at 6:29 pm by Heywood.)
(February 26, 2014 at 4:16 pm)futilethewinds Wrote: The wins for marriage equality are finally making their way to the South. It's nice to think that if I do meet someone who is right for me, I will be able to marry her in my lifetime and have that marriage actually be legally recognized. Not if she is already married you won't. Marriage equality won't exist until polygamous marriages are legally recognized.  |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
